Jharkhand Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md Ezaz Alias Raja Babu Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5787 of 2014 Md. Ezaz @ Raja Babu ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 3. District Education Officer, Dhanbad 4. Circle Officer, Govindpur, Dhanbad . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A. 7 /12.12.2014 The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction for restraining the respondents from illegally interfering with the possession of the petitioner in respect of land situated at Mouza No. 166, Khata No. 19, Plot No. 1692 at Govindpur, Dhanbad and for a direction restraining the respondents from taking coercive step, dispossessing the petitioner from the property in question.2. Briefly stated, the facts disclosed in the writ petition are summarised hereunder; The petitioner claims to have purchase...
R S Teachers Training College Through Its Secretary Mr Prabhas Kumar S ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3932 of 2014 R.S. Teachers Training College, run by Radhey Shyam Memorial Trust, DistDhanbad, Jharkhand through its Secretary, Mr. Prabhas Kumar Sah ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh 2. Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh 3. The State of Jharkhand, Human Resources Department, through its Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Higher Education, Ranchi 4. Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Higher Education, Human Resources Department, Ranchi 5. Director, Secondary and Higher Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi ... Respondents ----------------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the Vinoba Bhave University: Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Choubey, J.C to S.C. III 09/12.12.2014 I.A. No. 6436 of 2014 This application has been filed seeking amendment in t...
Sharat Kumar Majee and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5660 of 2003 with W.P.(S) No. 6497 of 2003 1. Devendra Singh 2. Jay Nandan Mishra 3. Amarnath Singh 4. Kaushal Kishore Mandal 5. Kauleshwar Tiwari 6. Praduman Prasad Singh 7. Naiyer Azam 8. Satya Narayan Prasad 9. Raj Kumar Nath Tiwari 10. Satendra Yadav 11. Bipin Kumar Singh 12. Jawahar Lal Upadhyay 13. Bidya Nand Singh 14. Sunil Kumar Singh 15. Naushal Alai 16. Ram Narayan Ram 17. Bharat Lal Keshri 18. Muneshwar Yadav 19. Manu Das 20. Kamla Devi 21. Hirday Narayan Singh 22. Md. Alam 23. Lako Mahto 24. Deoraj Singh 25. Dipak Thakur 26. Barku Hembram 27. Din Dayal Ramani 28. Md. Ismail 29. Har Gauri Kisku 30. Md. Hamid Ansari 31. Bahadur Das 32. Alku Mahto 33. Jaldhar Marandi 34. Babulal Soren 35. Anil Singh 36. Dasrath Mahto 37. Dhajadhari Singh 38. Umesh Marik 39. Mattu Lal Hembram ...... Petitioner ( in W.P.S. 5660 /03) 1. Sharat Kumar Majee 2. Prabin Kumar Dubey 3. Mosud Miya 4. Chhotelal Mirdha 5. Sagar Dutta 6. Joychand Mahato 7...
Aruna Rani Prajapati Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.2934 of 2013 --- Aruna Rani Prajapati, Kumar Toli, Sukhdeonagar, Ranchi. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jamuna Prasad 3. Mina Devi 4. Mukund Prajapati Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate For the State : Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate ----- I.A. No.3570 of 2014 09/11.12.2014. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and on being satisfied with the grounds shown in the Interlocutory Application, the delay of fifty eight (58) days in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 3570 of 2014 stands disposed. Cr. M.P. No.2934 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. This application has been filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. for setting aside that part of the judgment and order passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-X, Ranchi on 14.0...
The State of Jharkhand Through Its Chief Secretary and Ors Vs. Steel A ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 487 of 2014 with I.A.No. 6222 of 2014 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary having office at Jharkhand Mantralaya, Project Bhawan, HEC Township, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Nepal House, PO & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi 3. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, PO & PS- Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum ... Appellants/Respondents Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through the General Manager (liason) Mr. Debananda Marndi, son of late Balai Marndi, resident of Room No. 26, IEH, SAIL Satellite Township, PO- Dhurwa, PS- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand, having office at ISPAT Bhawan, Raw Materials Division, Steel Authority of India Limited, Ranchi, PO & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi ...Respondent/Petitioner 2. The Jharkhand State Election Commission, through its Secretary, Nirwach...
Devendra Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5660 of 2003 with W.P.(S) No. 6497 of 2003 1. Devendra Singh 2. Jay Nandan Mishra 3. Amarnath Singh 4. Kaushal Kishore Mandal 5. Kauleshwar Tiwari 6. Praduman Prasad Singh 7. Naiyer Azam 8. Satya Narayan Prasad 9. Raj Kumar Nath Tiwari 10. Satendra Yadav 11. Bipin Kumar Singh 12. Jawahar Lal Upadhyay 13. Bidya Nand Singh 14. Sunil Kumar Singh 15. Naushal Alai 16. Ram Narayan Ram 17. Bharat Lal Keshri 18. Muneshwar Yadav 19. Manu Das 20. Kamla Devi 21. Hirday Narayan Singh 22. Md. Alam 23. Lako Mahto 24. Deoraj Singh 25. Dipak Thakur 26. Barku Hembram 27. Din Dayal Ramani 28. Md. Ismail 29. Har Gauri Kisku 30. Md. Hamid Ansari 31. Bahadur Das 32. Alku Mahto 33. Jaldhar Marandi 34. Babulal Soren 35. Anil Singh 36. Dasrath Mahto 37. Dhajadhari Singh 38. Umesh Marik 39. Mattu Lal Hembram ...... Petitioner ( in W.P.S. 5660 /03) 1. Sharat Kumar Majee 2. Prabin Kumar Dubey 3. Mosud Miya 4. Chhotelal Mirdha 5. Sagar Dutta 6. Joychand Mahato 7...
Ms Tata Steel Limited Through Mrs Meena Lall Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5225 of 2014 ..... M/s Tata Steel Ltd. an existing Company incorporated under the Companies Act through Mrs. Meena Lall wife of Shri Behari Lall, working as Chief Legal Services having registered office at 24, Homi Mody Street, PO Fort, PS Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, PO & PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum ... ... ... ..... ..... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Gelogy, Nepal House, PO & PS- Doranda, District-Ranchi 2. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, PO & PS- Chaibasa, District-West Singhbhum 3. Election Commission of India through Chief Electoral Officer-cum-Principal Secretary, Cabinet(Election) Department having its Office at Sector-2, PO & PS Dhurwa Town & District-Ranchi ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petition...
Dinesh Pradhan Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P No. 2611 of 2013 . Dinesh Pradhan .. . Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Duryodhan Hazra 3. Ram Prasad Hazra .. . Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Saibal Kumar Liak, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Mr. R.C. Sahu, Advocate. . 11/ Dated 11th December, 2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2. In the present application challenge has been made to the order dated 30.8.2013 passed by Sessions Judge, at Dhanbad in Cr. Rev. No. 169 of 2013, by which the revision application preferred against the order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Dhanbad in C.P. Case no. 22 of 2010 has been dismissed. It appears that the petitioner had filed a complaint case on 5.01.2010 and after filing of the said complaint and on inquiry co...
Gour Chandra Gorai and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1027 of 2010 1. Gour Chandra Gorai.2. Rakhal Gorai.3. Dilip Gorai.4. Mitul Gorain.5. Satya Narain Gorai.6. Ganesh Gorai @ Ganesh Chandra Gorai ....Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Dinbandhu Gorai .....Opposite Parties ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Shailesh For the State : A.P.P. ----- 10/10.12.2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for O.P. No.2.2. In this application, the prayer of the petitioners is for setting aside the order dated 17.07.2010, passed in Criminal Revision No. 80/2010 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. III at Dhanbad, by which the revision application preferred on behalf of the petitioners against the order dated 25.01.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Dhanbad in C.P. Case No. 416/200...
Jareena Khatun Alias Jareena Bibi and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.383 of 2014 1. Jareena Khatun @ Jareena Bibi 2. Lallu Khan @ Mahmud Alam 3. Rashid Khan ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Respondent --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sayed T. Sajid, Adv. For the State : A.P.P. ----------- 4/Dated:10.12.2014 This revision has been preferred against the order dated 09.04.2014 passed by the Addl. District Judge No.VII, Palamau in S.T. No.343 of 2009, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been rejected.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has assailed the impugned order and submitted that P.W-6, Daizy Khatun in her examination-in-chief has stated that I have prevented him but in spite of my prevention Rashid Khan has committed rape upon me and thereafter he took me to his mother and told her that this is your (bahu) daughter-in-law. That in para- 2, P.W-6 in exami...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »