Jharkhand Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms Tata Steel Limited Through Mrs Meena Lall Vs. The State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 434 of 2014 --- M/s Tata Steel Ltd. an existing Company incorporated under the Companies Act through Mrs. Meena Lall wife of Shri Behari Lall, working as Chief Legal Services having registered office at 24, Homi Mody Street, PO Fort, PS Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, PO & PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum ... ... ... ..... ..... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Nepal House, P.O.&P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi 2. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, P.O.& P.S.-Chaibasa, District-West Singhbhum 3. Election Commission of India through Chief Electoral Officer-cum-Principal Secretary, Cabinet(Election) Department, office at Sector-II, P.O.& P.S.-Dhurwa Town, District Ranchi ... ..... ..... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner: M/s Ab...
Dharmendra Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand Thr Its Chief Secretary
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5677 of 2014 Dharmendra Kumar S/o Lalan Kumar R/o Chandra Residency, Chesire Home Road, Bariayatu, Ranchi ...... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Secretary, Rural Works Department, Ranchi 4. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Dumka, Rural Works Department, Dumka 5. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Deoghar, Rural Works Department, Deoghar 6. Verma Dayal Ram @ Vishnu Dyal Ram ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the State : M/s A. Allam, Sr. S.C.II , Priya Shreshtha, J.C to Sr.SCII For the Respt.No.6 : Mr. A.K.Sahani 05/23.12.2014 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the impugned notification dated 24.10.2014 (Annexure-9) issued by the Rural Works Department, Gover...
Ram Lakhan Mehta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 52 of 2005 ----------- Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.III, Daltonganj in connection with Sessions Trial No. 25 of 2004. ----------- Ram Lakhan Mehta, son of Sri Jimedar Mehta, resident of village- Takia Sabono, P.S.-Hussainabad, District-Palamau . . . Appellant --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . . Respondent For the Appellant: Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate M/s Ravi Prakash, Awanish Shekhar, Advocates For the State : Mr. P.K. Appu, A.P.P. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- JUDGMENT C.A.V. ON:19. 12/2014 PROUNCED ON:22. 12/2014 The sole appellant Ram Lakhan Mehta has assailed his conviction under Section 314 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.III, Daltonganj who has sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment f...
Som Nath Banerjee Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2878 of 2001 Som Nath Banerjee ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Dilip Kumar .....Opposite Parties ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr.Awanish Shekhar, Advocate ----- 18/22.12.2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings including the order dated 2.3.2001 by which cognizance for the offence under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with complaint case no 155 of 2000 has been taken.3. The prosecution story as would appear from the complaint petition is that the accused persons are alleged to have accepted a policy being Policy No. 551328477, which was communicated to the complainant through a postc...
Manoj Yadav and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3528 of 2013 --- 1.Manoj Yadav 2.Basant Yadav 3.Dhananjay Kumar Soni 4.Sahdeo Sahu Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Deo Narayan Yadav Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 1: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. For the Opposite Party No. 2: M/s. B. K. Dubey & N. K. Roy, Advocate --- 9/22.12.2014 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 2. In this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the order dated 05.06.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in C. P. Case No. 132 of 2013 by which cognizance has been taken for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 436 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.3. The prosecution story as would appear is that on 26.09.2012 at about 9...
Indradeo Mandal and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1363 of 2007 1. Indradeo Mandal 2. Mahendra Mandal 3. Ladu Mandal 4. Shyam Sunder Mandal 5. Raghu Nandan Mandal 6. Devendra Mandal 7. Binod Mandal 8. Arjun Mandal 9. Duryodhan Mandal 10. Sachida Nandan Mandal 11. Guddu Mandal ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandrika Debya Opposite Party --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. For the State : A. P. P. --- Order No. 13 Dated 22nd December , 2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 as well as learned counsel for the State. In the present criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 10.9.2007 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Cr. Rev. No. 66 of 2006 as also for quashing the order dated 3.4.2006 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in P.C.R. Case No. 742 of 2005 (T.R. No. 878 of 2006...
Gurudev Mahato Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1889 of 2014 ----------- Gurudev Mahato ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .Opposite Parties ----- Coram: HONBLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 05/22.12.2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Chakulia (Shyam Sunderpur) P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014, which has been registered for the offences under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code as also Rule 4/54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004. The prosecution story as would appear from the FIR instituted by the Circle Officer, Chakulia is that in course of inspection, three vehicles bearing registration no. UR28-2659, JH05-AA-7749 and U.K. 8268 were found loaded with sand. On being queried, the driver could not produc...
Smt. Kamla Devi and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision. No.216 of 2002 1. Smt. Kamla Devi, W/o Satyendra Kumar 2. Satyendra Kumar, S/o Deo Raj Prasad, Resident of Munsiff Road, Mohall Jailhata, P.O. Daltonganj, District Palamau 3. Smt. Satyawanti Devi, W/o Rabindra Prasad Singh 4. Rabindra Prasad Singh, S/o Kamla Prasad Singh, Resident of Muhalla Jailhata (Back Road of Mohan Cinema), P.S. Daltonganj, Palamau . Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Kalyani Devi, W/o Sri Vedbrat Prasad 3. Vedbrat Prasad, W/o Late Chandrika Prasad Verma, Resident of Muhalla - Hamidganj, P.S. - Daltonganj, Palamau .... Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P For the Opp. Parties : Mr. B. P. Jaiswal, Advocate --------- nd 08/Dated:22. December , 2014 This Revision is directed against the order dated 22.02.2002 passed by the Executive Magistrate, Daltonganj in Miscellaneous Case No.44...
Krishna Mohan Prasad Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2314 of 2014 Krishna Mohan Prasad ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Drug Inspector, Bokaro, PMCH Campus, Dhanbad ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Prasad For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No. 2 --- Order No. 05 Dated 22th December , 2014 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. In the present criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding as well as the order taking cognizance dated 2.6.2014 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with C-2 (Drugs & Cosmetics Act) Case No. 38 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, cognizance for the offence punishable u/s 27(d) of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 has been taken. The prosecution story in brief is that the medicine Pertenol-25 mg procured form Bokaro Civil Surgeon M...
Jharkhand Van Shramik Union Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2404 of 2010 Jharkhand Vam Shramik Union, Daltonganj, South Forest Division, Palamau, Daltonganj through its President Siddhi Nath Jha R/o Palamau, Daltonganj ...... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Forest & Environment,Ranchi 3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Ranchi 4. Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Ranchi 5. Chief Conservator of Forest(Wild Life), Ranchi 6. Conservator of Forest cum Field Director, Tiger Project, Daltonganj 7. Conservator of Forest(Buffer Area), Tiger Project, South Forest Division, Palamau, Daltonganj 8. Conservator of Forest(Core Area), Tiger Project, South Forest Division, Palamau, Daltonganj ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.5918 of 2014 1. Ram Dayal Mahto 2. Basudeo Gope 3. Somlal Sundi 4. Shiv Shankar Mahato 5.Anil Bodra 6. Saru Purty 7.Shravan Nayak 8. Ajit Mundri 9.Anil Dahanga 10. Pandu Kandir 11. Bhupendra Pradhan ...... Pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »