Skip to content

Jharkhand Court November 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 18 2014

Purnman Thapa (Jap-I) Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-18-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.1817 of 2011 Purnman Thapa Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arshad Hussain, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.G. --------- 05/Dated:18. h November, 2014 Petitioner being aggrieved with the orders dated 22.5.2009, 14.12.2009 and 29.6.2010 by which he had been terminated from service, has approached this Court. It has been argued on behalf of petitioner that he had been appointed as Constable in the year 1988 and while he was posted in the security of Ex-Chief Minister Shri Madhu Koda he had been served with the memorandum of charge alleging therein, that without taking permission from the competent authority he came out from his battalion and also misbehaved with other constables who were deputed in the security duty of Resaldar Baba Mela, Doranda, Ranchi and also threatened them. After receiving memorandum of ch...


Nov 17 2014

Ajay Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2178 of 2010 Ajay Prasad .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Civil Surgeon -Cum- Chief Medical Officer Godda .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, J.C. to Sr. SC II ----- 06/17.11.2014 The petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 8.3.2010 has approached this Court by which his contractual appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Primary Health Centre, Poraiyahat, district Godda has been taken away on the ground of judicial custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner although was appointed on contract basis in the year 2003 with certain conditions, for which, an agreement was entered into between the department and the petitioner wherein there is specific condition for removing the contractual appointee from service by g...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial