Jharkhand Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Mister Azad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2014
W. P. (S) No. 1908 of 2007 An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ---- Md. Mister Azad ....Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi. ........Respondents ---- For the Petitioner : M/s. Anjani Kumar Verma &Azeemuddin, Advs. For the Respondents : Ms. Priya Shreshta, J.C. to Sr. S.C.II ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH By Court Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has been dismissed from service by impugned order dated 13th August, 2005 passed by Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Annexure5. The petitioner's appeal has also been rejected by the order passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, Sough Chotanagpur Range, respondent no. 2 vide dated 29th October...
Sunil Kumar Marandi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2014
W.P.(S).No. 6034 of 2005 ----- In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. ------ Sunil Kumar Marandi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms 3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department 4. The Deputy Secretary to the Govt. Finance Department 5. The Director, Land Records and Survey 6. The Settlement Officer, Ranchi ............ Respondents ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nandan Prasad For the Respondent : Mr. Dhananjay Dubey, Sr. S.C.I Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ----------- Aparesh Kumar Singh, J:- Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner's representation for grant of higher scale of pay under the 6th Pay Revision implemented w.e.f. 1.1.1996 vide Finance Department Resolution dated 8.2.1999 has been rejected by the impugned order contained in memo no. 1246 dated 15.6.2005(Annexure-6). Petitioner, who is a Draftsmen posted in the Settlement Office ...
Hindustan Copper Limited Through Its General Manager Mines Sri Deb Kum ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4991 of 2014 Hindustan Copper Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, Kolkata, West Bengal Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. Dy. Secretary to the Government, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Assistant Mining Officer, East Singhbhum Jamshedpur ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. R. Venkatramani, Sr. Advocate Mr. A.K. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G. For the Intervenor :Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate C.A.V. on 21/11/2014 Pronounced on 28/11/2014 Challenging orders dated 03.09.2014 and 06.09.2014 and seeking a direction upon the respondents to immediately and forth...
Hindustan Copper Limited Through Its General Manager Mines Sri Deb Kum ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2364 of 2014 Hindustan Copper Limited through its General Manager(Mines) ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi 2. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi 3. The Director, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India IA Division, New Delhi 4. Deputy Director, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India IA Division, New Delhi ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. R. Venkatramani, Senior Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate Mr. Sharad Kaushal, Advocate For the Union of India:Mr. Rajiv Sinha, A.S.G.I. Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate For the Intervenor : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate C.A.V. on: 21.11.2014 Pronounced on: 28.11.2014 The writ petition was filed on 01.05.2014 ...
Chandra Shekhar Biswas Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4268 of 2013 Ashim Banerjee Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4292 of 2013 Pijush Kanti Ash Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4301 of 2013 Chandra Shekhar Biswas Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4339 of 2013 Angshu Gupta Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4395 of 2013 Hazam Charan Tudu Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4396 of 2013 Sujit Kumar Sardar @ Sanjit Kumr Sardar Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : M/s P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate, A.K. Sahani, Indrajit Sinha & Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocates For the State : M/s Pankaj Kumar & Laxmi Murmu, A.P.Ps. -------- 6/ 27.11.2014 All these anticipatory bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, except the petitioner Hazam Charan Tud...
Ranjit Kumar Singh and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 7538 of 2011 --- Ranjit Kumar Singh & another --- --- ---- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department of the State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Kumar & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates For the State: JC to GP-VI --- 06/ 27.11.2014 Heard counsel for the parties.2. These two petitioners have retired as Assistant Teachers from St. Joseph's School, Guhiajori, Dumka, a Government Recognized Aided Minority School, on 31.02.2002 and 28.02.2002 respectively. The only grievance of the petitioners is that their claim for leave encashment amount earned during the period of their service, has been rejected by the impugned order dated 18.02.2009 (Annexure-10) passed by the District Education Officer, Dumka pursuant to the representations made by these petitioners on the basis of the observations...
Md Shakil and Anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 3544 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 482 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3632 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 487 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4049 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 490 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3679 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 496 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3904 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 499 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3684 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 504 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3905 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 505 of 2014 With I.A. No. 5892 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 536 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3929 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 544 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4039 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 554 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4041 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 556 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4108 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 562 of 2014 With I.A. No. 5464 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 728 of 2014 ------------ Rajan Bouri ..Appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 482/2014 Dilip Soren Appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 487/2014 -2- Ahmad Ansari @ Lala .....Appell...
Prakash Bhuiyan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 3544 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 482 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3632 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 487 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4049 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 490 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3679 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 496 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3904 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 499 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3684 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 504 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3905 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 505 of 2014 With I.A. No. 5892 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 536 of 2014 With I.A. No. 3929 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 544 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4039 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 554 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4041 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 556 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4108 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 562 of 2014 With I.A. No. 5464 of 2014 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 728 of 2014 ------------ Rajan Bouri ..Appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 482/2014 Dilip Soren Appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 487/2014 -2- Ahmad Ansari @ Lala .....Appell...
Saroj Kumar Sarkhel Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 7511 of 2011 ---- Saroj Kumar Sarkhel ... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand and ors. ... ... Respondents ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioner :Mr. N.P.Choudhary For the Respondents :Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, JC to SC I. ---- 7- 27.11.2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.10.2011 passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Jamtara, respondent no.4, whereunder an amount of Rs.1,51,969/- has been ordered to be recovered from the petitioner as excess payment and his claim for payment of retiral dues has been rejected. He has also made a prayer for payment of gratuity amount sanctioned on 31.1.2010 vide Annexure 4 after deduction of a sum of Rs.1.00 lac, which was earlier paid in advance at the time of his retirement. He has also made a prayer for fixation and payment of pension along with its arrears, leave encashment amount, dearne...
Ashim Banerjee Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4268 of 2013 Ashim Banerjee Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4292 of 2013 Pijush Kanti Ash Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4301 of 2013 Chandra Shekhar Biswas Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4339 of 2013 Angshu Gupta Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4395 of 2013 Hazam Charan Tudu Versus The State of Jharkhand with A. B. A. No. 4396 of 2013 Sujit Kumar Sardar @ Sanjit Kumr Sardar Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : M/s P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate, A.K. Sahani, Indrajit Sinha & Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocates For the State : M/s Pankaj Kumar & Laxmi Murmu, A.P.Ps. -------- 6/ 27.11.2014 All these anticipatory bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, except the petitioner Hazam Charan Tud...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »