Jharkhand Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
R. Banumathi, C.J. and Shree Chandrashekhar, J. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondents to implement the circular issued by the Central Government and State Government for age relaxation for OBC and also for issuance of an appropriate direction to re-fix the age relaxation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates and to provide for relaxation of three years as five years. 2. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) issued Advertisement No.4/2013 published in various newspapers on 10.12.2013, by which applications were invited from the eligible candidates for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) (Munsif) fixing the maximum age of 35 years for the candidates of general category including backward classes. As per proviso to Rule 5, in case of female candidate or candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, there shall be a relaxation of the upper age limit by 3 years. As per Rule 5, there is no age relaxation of upper a...
Gopi Nath Ghosh Petitioner Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
R. Banumathi, C.J. 1. Based upon the newspaper report published in the Hindustan Times dated 24.1.2011, the petitioner has filed this Public Interest Litigation to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to immediately settle all claims of compensation and Government employment as per the existing schemes for civilian deaths that might have occurred in the course of violence between the State Security Forces and the Naxalities and for other directions. 2. The petitioner claims himself to be a human rights activist and to be working for the rights of workers in the unorganized sector especially for Tendu Leaf Pickers in West Singhbhum district of Jharkhand and for other human rights issues. 3. The case of the petitioner is that there are revised guidelines of the Central Scheme for assistance to civilian victims/family of victims of terrorist, communal and naxal violence dated 25.1.2010, which states that an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs.3 lakhs) would be given for each death or...
Usha MartIn Limited (Usha Ismal Division), Ranchi Vs. Dashrath Upadhya ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
Amitav K. Gupta, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order/judgment dated 12.08.2011 passed by learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition, C.W.J.C.NO.1408/1999(R) of the appellant challenging the award dated 04.06.1998 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi in Reference Case no.34 of 1994 whereby the appellant was directed to reinstate the workman, Dashrath Upadhyay with full back wages. 2. The Reference made by the Government of Bihar, vide Notification No.4/D2-6033/94 issued under Section 10(1)(c) was: œWhether termination of services of workman Dashrath Upadhyay by the management of M/s.Usha Martin Industries Ltd.,Ishmal Division,Tatisilwai,Ranchi is justified? If not what relief the workman is entitled to?? 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C NO. 1408 of 1999(R) and submitted that the learned Single Judge should have considered the legal position as deci...
Mahabir Prasad Rungta Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Ap ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
R. Banumathi, C.J. 1. The assessee has preferred this appeal, being aggrieved with the order dated 24.1.2002 passed by the Tribunal in IT (SS)A No.65(Pat.) 2001. 2. Search and seizure operations were conducted on 27.10.1997 at the premises of the assessee under the provision of section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice under section 158BC of the Act was issued to the assessee on 20.11.1998 calling upon him to file his returns within a period of 45 days. The assessee filed the returns for the block period disclosing undisclosed income of Rs.6,51,321/-. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 158BC and had assessed the undisclosed income at Rs.40,75,868/-, vide assessment order dated 26.10.1999. Aggrieved by the said order of assessment, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals), who allowed the appeal in part, vide order dated 15.10.2001. Not satisfied with the order of the CIT (Appeals), the assessee preferred second appeal to the Trib...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›