Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Gupta and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7614 of 2013 ----- 1.Rajesh Gupta 2.Basant Sharma @ Basant Kr. Sharma 3.Ganga Saw @ Ganga Prasad Gupta 4.Chunchun Gupta .... .... ... .... Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Opposite Party ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Mangal Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 21.09.2013 The present bail application is filed under Sections 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail in connection with Katras P.S. Case No.120 of 2013 (G.R. No.2023 of 2013) for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 332, 353, 290, 427, 283, 224, 225, 504 of the I.P.C., arising out of G.R. Case No.2023 of 2013, which is now pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dhanbad. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the alleged crime, but subsequently in cour...
Diwakar Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8788 of 2013 Diwakar Mandal Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Appellant : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P .P. 03/ 21.09.2013 The defect, pointed out by the office, is ignored. Call for a status report from the court concerned as to how many witnesses have been examined till the date and what is the time expected to conclude the trial. Let this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of petitioner. (D. N. Upadhyay, J.) NKC...
Smt Geeta Devi Agrawal Alias Geeta Agarwala Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2278 of 2013 Smt. Geeta Devi Agrawal @ Geeta Agarwala Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bom Shankar Chaudhary Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P .P. 04/ 21.09.2013 Present Cr.M.P . has been filed to restore A.B.A. No.1829 of 2013 which stood dismissed for default for noncompliance of the order dated 18.07.2013. I do not feel that there is any bar in preferring another application for grant of bail nor further bail application suffers from resjudicata. In the circumstances, I do not feel inclined to allow this Cr.M.P. and the same stands dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh bail application, if any. ...
Damu SurIn Alias Dumbi SurIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.7458 of 2013 Damu Surin @ Dumbi Surin..............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta For the State : A.P.P 2/ 21.9.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Muffasil P.S. case no.16 of 2008 registered under sections 341, 342, 364, 302, 201,114/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this petitioner as well as seven other accused persons named in the FIR as well as some unknown persons have been alleged to have committed murder of the deceased after committing rape upon her but the other accused persons, namely, Gundi Surin, Jore Gagrai have been admitted to bail taking into account of the period of custody which were more than five years. Similar is the case of this petitioner and moreover, the witness...
Ram Pravesh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
Cr.M.P.No. 4692 of 2001 ---------- Against the order dated 24.07.2001 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Dumka in Cr. Revision No. 147 of 2000/63 of 2001. ---------- Ram Pravesh Singh. Petitioner(s) -Versus- State of Jharkhand & Others. ... Opp. Parties ---------- For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr.Advocate. For the Opp. Party: A.P.P. ---------- C.A.V. on 12.04.2013: Pronounced on 21.09.2013 ---------- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY --------- D.N.Upadhyay,J This Cr.Misc. Application has been filed for quashing the order dated 24.7.2001 passed by Sri B.B.M.Murty, learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Dumka, in Cr. Revision No. 147 of 2000/63 of 2001 and also order dated 29.9.2000 passed by Sri Deonandan Pd. Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara in Misc. Case No. 2 of 1994 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate has granted maintenance of Rs.500/- to Ram Kumari Devi (Opposite Party No.2) and Rs. 250/- to her children (opposite party no.3 and4) till their att...
Ashok Prajapati Alias Ashok Prajpati Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7208 of 2013 Ashok Prajapati @ Ashok Prajpati Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Anita Devi Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Devesh Krishna, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:21. h September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 498A, 323, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially the case was registered under Section 323 of the I.P.C. Thereafter, the complainant preferred revision which was allowed whereafter the trial Court took cognizance under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and allied sections. He has further submitted that there is no specific allegation of mental or physical harassment or torture that it i...
Haidar Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2938 of 2013 Haidar Ansari ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the State: Mr. Krishna Shankar, APP 2/21.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Joya Khan Alias Jaya Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.7456 of 2013 Joya Khan @ Jaya Singh ..............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mrs. J.Tripathy For the State : A.P.P 2/ 21.9.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Dhanbad P.S. case no.577 of 2013 registered under sections 3/4/5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. Regard being had to the nature of allegation and the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in Dhanbad P.S. case no.577 of 2013 (G.R.No.2280 of 2013). ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Jai Prakash Tiwari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7529 of 2013 ----- Jai Prakash Tiwari @ Tinku .... .... ... .... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Opposite Party ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Lina Shakti, Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocates For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.2, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 21.09.2013 The present bail application is filed under Sections 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S.Case No.25 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. Case No.75 of 2013, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 387 of the I.P.C., arising out of G.R. Case No. 75 of 2013, which is now pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the alleged crime. It is further submitted that there is no d...
Masomat Geeta Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7539 of 2013 ----- Masomat Geeta Devi @ Masomat Geeta .... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Opposite Party ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Moti Gope, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 21.09.2013 The present bail application is filed under Sections 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail in connection with Giridih (M) P.S.Case No. 143 of 2013 (G.R. No.975 of 2013) for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 304 (B)/ 34 of the I.P.C. and under Section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which is now pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is an old lady aged about 60 years as well as she is mother in law of the deceased lady. It is further submitted that she has been falsely implicated in the alleged crime. It is further s...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »