Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md Naushad Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7173 of 2013 Md. Naushad Khan Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 3/4/5/6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on secret information, Inspector- Suresh Prasad Paswan, raided the house of the petitioner and arrested four females. It is alleged that the petitioner was running an organized prostitution. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offence under Section 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act), 1956 is not attracted, as there was no forcible detention of any of the ladies by this petitioner. T...
Jiwan Jyoti Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 4316 of 2012 Jiwan Jyoti Prasad .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors ..... .... Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash , APP For the Opposite Parties: Mr. D.K. Karmakar 14/23.09.2013: It is submitted that informant has filed Annexure-B which is not the copy of its original. Under the said circumstance, counsel for the informant is directed to file supplementary affidavit annexing the original of Annexure-B. As prayed by learned counsel for the informant, put up this case after Puja Vacation. In the meantime, interim order dated 07.02.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ajay Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1632 of 2013 Ajay Kumar ...................................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2: Mr.S.K.Pandey 2/ 23.9.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2. The entire criminal proceeding or Complaint Case No.1435 of 2010 including the order dated 7.9.2011 passed by the then Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the parties got their monetary dispute settled. It is the case of the petitioner, who happens tobe the complainant of the case that he had given a sum of Rs.40,000/- to the opposite party no.2 to deposit in its account but the opposite party no.2 did not deposit the same rather misappro...
Harshanand Yangad Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3879 of 2013 Harshanand Yangad .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Dubey For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. I & Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. 04/23.09.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner claims to be husband of one Lusi Jyoti Yangad, Assistant Teacher who had taken voluntary retirement from Carmel High School, Bokaro Thermal Power Station, Bokaro w.e.f. 1.10.1999. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the services of the petitioner's wife was confirmed vide letter dated 13.2.1985 w.e.f. 15.1.1978 ( Annexure-2). It is further submitted that the petitioner's wife had severe heart attack in October, 1994 and thereafter she opted for voluntary retirement. She subsequently passed away on 19.4.2012. The death certificate has been annexed as Annexure-10 to the writ application. It is...
Tinku Lal Alias Chandra Prakash Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7193 of 2013 Tinku Lal @ Chandra Prakash Sinha Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegations is that five unknown criminals looted a sum of Rs. 3,78,445/- from the Kshetriya Gramin Bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that this petitioner's name transpired in the statement of the informer, who stated that the petitioner along with other persons were seen going to the place of occurrence. That on similar allegation co-accused, namely, Teka Ram, has been admitted on bail in B.A. No. 8977...
MohiuddIn Ansari Alias Nuwa Mian Alias Sufi Baba Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4102 of 2013 Mohiuddin Ansari @ Nuwa Mian @ Sukhi Baba... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar Jha For the State: Mr. P.K. Appu ,APP 4/23.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Bijay Mehta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1695 of 2013 Bijay Mehta ................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ................ Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kumar No.3 For the State : A.P.P 2/ 23.9.13. The FIR of Barkatha P.S case no.33 of 2012 instituted under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code is being sought to be quashed by the petitioner, who, at the relevant point of time, was posted as Panchayat Sewak, on the ground that the petitioner, though has been alleged to have released the amount of 2nd instalment in favour of beneficiary who after getting the amount of 1st instalment did not construct the house but the amount which was released in instalment has never been withdrawn by the beneficiary and thereby that amount cannot be said to have been misappropriated by anyone. When the matter is under investigation by the Investigating Officer, who is expected to look into this aspect of the...
Arjun Singh Munda and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal(DB) No.386 o1. Arjun Singh Munda 2.Lakhinder Singh Munda 3.Shambhu Nath Singh Munda . Appellants Versus State of Jharkhand ...Respondent Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.P.Bhatt For the Appellants : Mr. Ashok Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Addl. P.P. ----- 05/23.09.2013 On receipt of lower court records, learned counsel for the appellants pressed the prayer for suspension of sentence of the appellants and their release on bail during pendency of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants' have been convicted with the aid of section 34 IPC, though there is absolutely no material or evidence to connect them with the crime with the aid of the said section; P.W.3- who is said to be the eye witness- has stated in the deposition that one Chaitan Singh Munda had assaulted her mother with slap when her mother fell down on the ground and at that time Mahadeo...
Smt Jaya Maity Alias Ajoya Maity Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3581 of 2013 Smt. Jaya Maity @ Ajoya Maity... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.A.S. Pati For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ,APP 2/23.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Jayanti Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.648 o1. Jayanti Devi 2.Rajeshwar Prasad Singh 3.Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dhananjay Singh 4.Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kr. Singh 5.Sushma Singh @ Sushma Devi.........Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2:Mr.S.K.Singh 6/ 23.9.13. Mr.Devesh Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners again reiterated that the petitioners are ready to settle the matrimonial dispute by giving due share to the complainant in the properties. Upon it, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that he needs to take instruction in this regard and therefore, the matter be posted in the next week. As prayed for on behalf of the opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed in the next week under the same heading. Till then, interim order passed on 19.8.2013 shall continue. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) N...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »