Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nawal Kishore Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P.A. No. 110 of 2013 Nawal Kishore Singh & Anr. Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellants : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : J.C to A.G 05/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants is seeking two weeks' time to remove the office defects. 2. Time, as prayed for, is granted.3. If the office defects are not removed within a period of two weeks, this matter shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sri Jiwan Prasad Agarwal
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 30 of 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna Appellant Versus Sri Jiwan Prasad Agarwal Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate 10/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. This appeal is Admitted. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent waives notice of admission. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
Ashok Paswan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.979 o1. Ashok Paswan.2. Rita Devi.3. Yogendra Paswan.4. Ganesh Paswan ......Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Appellants : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : APP --- I.A. No. 6899 o11. 18-09-2013 In this I.A., the appellants have prayed for their release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Mr. Mahesh Tewari, learned counsel for the appellants, submitted that though the appellants' same prayer was earlier rejected, they have remained in custody for more than 11 years; the conviction of the appellants is based on contradictory ocular testimony; charge under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out against appellant nos. 2, 3 and 4; no charge under section 34 IPC has been framed against them; appellant no. 2 is a lady. Learned APP opposed the appellants' prayer and submitted that there ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kamkap (India) Jamshedpur
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 7018 of 2013 In Tax Appeal No. 4 of 2006 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur Appellant Versus KAMKAP (INDIA), Jamshedpur Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate 07/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, it appears that there is delay of a day in preferring this tax appeal. Looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, the delay is, hereby, condoned. 2. Accordingly, I.A. No. 7018 of 2013 stands allowed and disposed of. T.A. No. 4 of 2006 Registry is directed to enlist T.A. No. 4 of 2006 on the board of Admission on 21...
Vijay Kumar Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 137 of 2013 Vijay Kumar Singh & another Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand & another Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellants : None For the State : J.C. to G.P.IV 05/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the appellants nor the matter is mentioned.2. With a view to give one more chance to the appellants, the matter is adjourned to be listed on 26th September, 2013. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Dhanbad Vs. Shri Santosh Kumar Khetan P ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 28 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dhanbad Appellant Versus Shri Santosh Kumar Khetan Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate 06/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. This appeal is Admitted. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent waives notice of admission. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K.Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
Lal Dharmraj Nath Shahdeo and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1303 of 2013 With Cr.M.P.No.1246 o1. George Mustafa Khan 2. Sanjay Kumar .Petitioners(in Cr.M.P.No.1303 of 2013) 1. Lal Dharmraj Natha Shahdeo 2. Kamal BhushanPetitioners(in Cr.M.P.No.1246 of 2013) VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.Opposite Parties CORAM:HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :Mr.P.P.N.Rai, Sr. Advocate 5/ 18.9.13. Both the applications arising out of the same case were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. These applications have been filed for quashing of the order dated 10.4.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi whereby and whereunder a complaint bearing complaint case no.597 of 2013 was sent before the concerned police station for its institution...
Nafis Ahmad Alias Pappu Alias Nafis Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2282 of 2013 Nafis Ahmad @ Pappu @ Nafis Khan... ....Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Irfat Jahan @ Maro ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmad For the State: Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, APP For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Pravin Kumar Rana 4/17.02.2012: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Nafis Ahmad @ Pappu @ Nafis Khan is moved by Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmad and opposed by Sri D.K. Chakraverty, learned Additional P.P. and Sri Pravin Kumar Rana,learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. At the out set, Md. Zaid Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant ( O.P. No.2) as his wife with all honour and dignity and for that purpose he is ready to give written undertaking in the court below. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 submits that the complainant is also ready to reside with the petitioner as his wife provided he give unde...
Vyas Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2964 of 2013 Vyas Prasad @ Vyasji Prasad... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey , APP 2/17.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ravindra Pal Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1335 of 2013 Ravindra Pal Singh ................. .............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .............. ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.A.K.Das For the State : Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,A.P.P 2.17.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Factory Inspector as opposite party no.2 Mr.H.K.Shikarwar, learned counsel appearing for the State accepts notice on behalf of opposite party no.2. Let this matter be listed after three weeks so that counter affidavit be filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2. Till then, further proceeding of C/2 case no.406 of 2012, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. ND/ ( R. R. Prasad, J.)...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »