Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gobardhan Singh Alias Gobra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6081 of 2013 Gobardhan Singh @ Gobra ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 6/ 18.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Basia P.S. Case No. 12 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 131 of 2011, S.T. No. 330 of 2012. The case relates to murder of father of the informant and the informant was informed about the occurrence by some persons that the petitioner had committed murder of his father by firearm, whereupon, he went to the place of occurrence and found his father in injured condition. The persons assembled there also informed the informant that the petitioner had fired pisto...
The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Cum Commissioner Departme ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 3719 of 2012 In L.P.A. No. 524 of 2012 The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Commercial Taxes, Ranchi Appellant Versus Kailash Prasad Yadav & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate 08/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 105 days in preferring this letters patent appeal, as submitted by learned counsel for the appellant.2. Notice was issued by this Court and the same has been served upon the respondents. Nobody has chosen to remain present before this Court nor they are represented by lawyer.3. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and looking to the reasons stated in ...
Binod Kumar Prabhakar Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through Its Chi ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P.A. No. 124 of 2013 Binod Kumar Prabhakar . Appellant Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. Raj Mangal Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Mahua Palit, Advocate 05/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants is seeking two weeks' time to remove the office defects. 2. Time, as prayed for, is granted.3. If the office defects are not removed within a period of two weeks, this matter shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
Banwari Sahu ? Banwari Sao Vs. Smt.Maya Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 681 of 2013 In First Appeal No. 35 of 2012 Banwari Sahu Appellant Versus Smt. Maya Devi . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : Mr. M. S. Anwar, Senior Advocate For the Respondent : 06/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 03 days in preferring this appeal.2. Notice was issued by this Court and the same has been served upon the respondent. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the respondent, though the respondent is served .3. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, it appears that there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay of 03 days. We, therefore, condo...
Jagat Kishore Prasad Alias Jagat Kishore Pd Singh Vs. State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 534 of 2012 Jagat Kishore Prasad @ Jagat Kishore Pd. Singh Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant : None For the State : None. 11/Dated: 18 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. When the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 2. Previously, half a dozen time the matter was listed and every time the learned counsel for the appellant sought for adjournment. Today also, when the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the appellant nor the matter is mentioned.3. With a view to give one more chance to the appellant, the matter is adjourned to be listed on 26th September, 2013. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Ajay/Chandan...
George Mustafa Khan and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1303 of 2013 With Cr.M.P.No.1246 o1. George Mustafa Khan 2. Sanjay Kumar .Petitioners(in Cr.M.P.No.1303 of 2013) 1. Lal Dharmraj Natha Shahdeo 2. Kamal BhushanPetitioners(in Cr.M.P.No.1246 of 2013) VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.Opposite Parties CORAM:HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :Mr.P.P.N.Rai, Sr. Advocate 5/ 18.9.13. Both the applications arising out of the same case were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. These applications have been filed for quashing of the order dated 10.4.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi whereby and whereunder a complaint bearing complaint case no.597 of 2013 was sent before the concerned police station for its institution...
Gopal Machhua Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1233 of 2006 Gopal Machhua ......Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : APP --- I.A. No. 6673 o07. 18-09-2013 In this I.A., the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though his same prayer was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for about 9 years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future. Learned APP opposed the appellant's prayer and submitted that his prayer for bail was earlier rejected twice on merit and no fresh ground has been made out for reconsideration. Regard being had to the facts that the appellant's prayer was earlier rejected on merit and no fresh ground has been made out except that he has remained in custody for ...
Md Chunnu Alias Md Samir Alias Md Chunnu Samir Vs. the State of Jharkh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8734 of 2013 Md. Chunnu @ Md. Samir @ Md. Chunnu-Samir ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 18.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 240 of 2013. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Md. Chunnu @ Md. Samir @ Md. Chunnu-Samir, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri G. K. Tiwary, learned Judicia...
Chandra Shekhar Kuila Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8729 of 2013 Chandra Shehar Kuila ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 4/ 18.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sidgora P.S. Case No. 214 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 3848 of 2012. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Chandra Shehar Kuila, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur, or his successo...
Munna Deo Alias Krishna Murari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8712 of 2013 Munna Deo @ Krishna Murari Deo ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 18.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 225 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 1727 of 2013. The case relates to robbery. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Munna Deo @ Krishna Murari Deo, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »