Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guru Prasad Mahato Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 411 of 2012 Guru Prasad Mahato ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. Purnendu Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the respondent : A.P.P. - -- I.A. (Cr.) No. 6036 of 2013 :05. 19.09.2013 In this interlocutory application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant's conviction alongwith some other is based on insufficient evidence; charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has not been proved against the appellant; the appellant has been convicted with the help of Sections 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code; there is no allegation against the appellant causing any injury; there is specific allegation giving fatal pistol shot injury against Kallu Mahato, Thakur Mahato and Manikant Mahato; nothing incr...
A K Pal Alias Arbind Kumar Pal Vs. Railways
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5266 of 2013 A.K. Pal @ Arbind Kumar Pal ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India represented through General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 2. Chief Commercial Manager(C), South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 3. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Eastern Railway Ranchi 4. Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) South Eastern Railway Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niladri S. Mukharjee For the Respondents :3. 19.09.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Unionof India Through Infantry Mahanideshalaya Vs. MoinuddIn Ansari
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 3413 of 2013 In W.P . (S) No. 5092 of 2012 Union of India through Infantry Mahanideshalay, Ministry of Defence Petitioner Versus Moinuddin Ansari Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV KUMAR GUPTA For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan (ASGI) For the Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate 6/Dated: 19 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. Rule.2. Rule is made returnable on 5th December 2013.3. Learned counsel for the respondent waives notice of Rule.4. So far as interim relief is concerned, there is prima facie case in favour of the petitioner, balance of convenience is also in favour of the petitioner and looking to the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench at Ranchi, prima facie the Tribunal has arrived at the conclusion that the charge levelled against the respondent has ...
Mustakim Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8858 of 2013 Mustakim Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No. 69 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 917 of 2013. The petitioner was apprehended while fleeing away with the stolen cycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Mustakim Ansari, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, ...
District Bar Association, Deog Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 5575 of 2011 District Bar Association, Deoghar ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Amicus Curiae For the C.B.I. : Mr. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG --- 18/19-09-2013 Learned Additional Advocate General, at the very outset, submitted that there was some confusion to the officers regarding the transfer of documents and that the same has been made clear. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deoghar, who is present in Court submitted that all the documents relating to Deoghar Town Police Station Case No. 260 of 2011 dated 30.08.2011 shall be handed over, in original, to the C.B.I. within a week. Mr. Mokhtar Khan, learned counsel for C.B.I., submitted that the C.B.I. could not proceed further in absence of the documents. On receipt thereof investiga...
Sumil Karmali and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8861 o1. Sunil Karmali 2. Sukra Manjhi ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. C.S. Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act, in connection with Gola P.S. Case No. 9 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 213 of 2010, S.T. No. 230 of 2013. The petitioners were not apprehended at the spot, rather, they have been named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Sunil Karmali and Sukra Manjhi, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (t...
Santosh Mahto Vs. Revenue Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 4779 of 2012 Santosh Mahto Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV KUMAR GUPTA For the Petitioner : None For the State : J.C. to A.G. 12/Dated: 19 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. When the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. With a view to give one more chance to the petitioner, the matter is adjourned to be listed on 22nd October, 2013. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Amitav Kumar Gupta, J.) Ajay/fahim...
Arun Kumar Singh Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 4891 of 2012 Arun Kumar Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV KUMAR GUPTA For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Kumar Agarwal, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.A.G. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. M.S. Anwar, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. A.K. Mehta, Advocate For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. P.K. Choudhary, Advocate For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate For Respondent No. 8 : Mrs. A.R. Choudhary, Advocate 08/Dated: 19 th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:1. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that an affidavit shall be filed by the Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.2. With a view to give one more chance to the State to file an affidavit, the matter is adjourned to be listed ...
Md.Shabbir ? Shabbir Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. APPEAL(D.B) No. 1348 of 2006 Md.Shabbir @Shabbir Mian ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand . .... Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. S.K.Jha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. I.A.No. 6326 of 2013 8/19.9.2013 In this I.A., appellant, namely, Md.Shabbir @ Shabbir Mian, has prayed for his release on bail, during pendency of this appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's same prayer was rejected several times, he has remained in custody for more than 9 years; the appeal is of the year 2006; there is no likelihood of appea...
Sri Dalip Singh Vs. Railways
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5418 of 2013 Sri Dalip Singh ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India represented through General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 2. Chief Commercial Manager(C), South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 3. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Eastern Railway, Ranchi 4. Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) South Eastern Railway Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niladri S. Mukherjee For the Respondents :2. 19.09.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »