Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md Jakir HussaIn Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1576 of 2013 Md. Jakir Hussain . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : APP ----- 02/19.09.2013: Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State and taking into account the allegation constituting offence under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 120(B), 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, I do not find it a fit case for quashing of the first information report of Amrapara P.S. Case No.31 of 2013 (G.R. No.493 of 2013). Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Notwithstanding, the application got dismissed, the points which have been raised by this petitioner, in this application, shall be available, at an appropriate stage. (R.R. Prasad, J.) Ravi...
Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10306 of 2012 Rajesh Kumar Yadav ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha For the State: Mr. S.S. Prasad, APP 9/19.09.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Rajesh Kumar Yadav in connection with Tundi P.S. Case No. 90 of 2008 ( G.R. No. 2364 of 2008 , S.T. No. 280 of 2009) pending in the court of learned A.S.J., 2 nd, Dhanbad is moved by Sri Shekhar Prasad Sinha and opposed by Sri S.S. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. Earlier petitioner's bail application rejected taking into account that against him altogether 11 cases are pending. On 23.07.2013 Sri Shekhar Prasad Sinha, counsel for the petitioner submitted that only two cases are pending against the petitioner. Accordingly, he has been directed to file certify copy of FIR and Charge sheet of all 11 cases, mentioned in paragraph nos. 105 of the case diary to show that petit...
Jagdish Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1970 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1976 of 2013 Jagdish Prasad ... ....Petitioner(in ABA 1970/2013) Chitranjan Prasad Singh.... ....Petitioner ( in ABA 1976/2013) Vs. The State of Jharkhand through CBI ....Opposite Party( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi ( in both cases) For the CBI: Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan( in both cases) 7/19.09.2013: Anticipatory bail applications filed by petitioner Jagdish Prasad ( petitioner in ABA No. 1970 of 2013) and Chitranjan Prasad Singh ( petitioner in ABA No. 1976 of 2013) are heard together as they arose from the same FIR. Heard Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Md. Mokhtar Khan, learned counsel for the CBI. It appears that petitioners are bank employees. The main allegation against them that they have wrongly scrutinized the documents furnished by different applicants for grant of loan with a view to favour the...
Ramji Tiwari and anr Vs. Railways
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5426 o1. Ramji Tiwari 2. Usha Devi ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India represented through General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 2. Chief Commercial Manager(C), South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 3. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Eastern Railway, Ranchi 4. Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) South Eastern Railway Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niladri S. Mukherjee For the Respondents :2. 19.09.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Ajay Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7893 of 2013 Ajay Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, in connection with Bano P.S. Case No. 23 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 204 of 2013. The petitioner was apprehended on 7.5.2013 and from his possession, one country-made revolver loaded with four cartridges was recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Ajay Singh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the lik...
Kartik Alias Kartik Pal and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6994 o1. Kartik @ Kartik Pal 2. Gopal @ Gopal Dey ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 420, 406 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 269 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 1374 of 2013. The petitioners were the employees of a goldsmith and it is alleged that they committed theft of gold from the shop. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Kartik @ Kartik Pal and Gopal @ Gopal Dey, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each, with two sureties ...
Asmaul Sk and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6987 o1. Kashibul Shaikh 2. Rakibul Shaikh 3. Hakim Shaikh 4. Kalu Shaikh Versus The State of Jharkhand with B. A. No. 7541 o1. Asmaul Sk.2. Dipu Sk. Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Both these bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 120B, 194, 324 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 231 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 598 of 2010. The FIR was lodged by the police officer alleging that the petitioner Asmaul Sk. lodged a wrong FIR before the police with respect to a case, in w...
Manoj Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8837 of 2013 Manoj Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 413, 414, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with I.E.L. P.S. Case No. 4 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 230 of 2013. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in illegal mining and transaction of coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Manoj Yadav, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri ...
Binod Rai Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7109 of 2013 Binod Rai ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 420, 384 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sonahatu P.S. Case No. 39 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 2880 of 2013. Two persons were apprehended while realising Rs. 60/- each from the villagers on the pretext of preparing 'Jiwika Kalyan Card' in their favour. The petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, rather, he is named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Binod Rai, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furn...
Mohan Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7114 of 2013 Mohan Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Section148. 149, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No. 87 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 258 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that there is allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons to have assaulted and injured the informant and his brother. Taking into consideration the injuries upon the injured as mentioned in the impugned order, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Mohan Yadav, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on fur...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »