Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gujun Alias Gujun Khan Alias Aaphtab Khan and Others Vs. the State of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1894 o1. Gujun @ Gujun Khan @ Aaphtab Khan 2.Sadruddin Khan @ Sadru Khan 3.Ekhlak Khan @ Ekbal Khan 4.Ansar Khan 5.Dablu @ Dablu Khan @ Hamdosh Alam 6.Abbu @ Abu Talha Khan 7.Altamas Khan @ Md. Altamas Khan... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Deepak Kumar For the State: Mr. Awanikant Prasad, APP 4/24.09.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner nos. 3 and 4, namely, Ekhlak Khan @ Ekbal Khan and Ansar Khan have already been arrested, therefore, anticipatory bail application filed on their behalf has become infurctuous. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner nos. 3 and 4, namely, Ekhlak Khan @ Ekbal Khan and Ansar Khan respectively, is dismissed as infructuous. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(Cr.) No.112 of 2013 AshokKumar Singh............... .................Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others................ Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj KUmar For the Union of India: Mr.Prabhash Kumar 8/ 24.9.13. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 1.10.2013. Till then interim order passed on 6.8.2013 shall continue. ( R. R. Prasad,J.) ND/...
Amit Kumar Kejriwal and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1736 o1. Amit Kumar Kejriwal 2. Sumit Kumar Kejriwal........ .................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Jerath For the State : A.P.P 2/ 24.9.13. Mr.Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel submits that he will be appearing on behalf of the informant by filing power and therefore, counsel for the petitioner be asked to serve a copy of the petition to him. Upon it, Mr.Jerath submits that a copy of the petition along with Annexures would be served upon him in course of the day. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 30.9.2013. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners of Nagar (Giridih) P.S. Case no.25 of 2013 (G.R.No.251 of 2013), pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. ( R. R. Prasad,J.) ND/...
Manindra Narayan Jha and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1726 o1. Manindra Narayan Jha 2.Chandar Jyoti Jha 3.Smt.Manju Jha @Manjula Devi 4.Smt. Renu Jha @ Renuka Devi........ .................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K.Sahani For the State : A.P.P 2/ 24.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is permitted to delete the name of petitioners no. 1 and 2. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the name of petitioners no.1 and 2 is deleted from the memo of petition. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 27.9.2013.. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners of Complaint case no.685 of 2011 (T....
Chiranjeet Bara Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 1154 of 2012 IN Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 813 of 2010 Chiranjeet Bara Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD For the Appellant : None For the State : A.P.P. 10/24th of September, 2013 Oral Order : Per D.N. Patel, J.1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the appellant is absent. However, learned counsel for the State is present.2. Previously also on 11th of April, 2013, learned counsel for the appellant was absent and the matter was adjourned. Thereafter, on 2nd of May, 2013, learned counsel for the appellant was absent and the matter was adjourned. Thereafter, on 20th of June, 2013 also, learned counsel for the appellant was absent and the matter was adjourned.3. Having heard learned counsel for the State and looking to the evidence on record, there is prima facie case against the present applicant.4. Previously also, prayer for suspension o...
Rajesh Toppo Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 5935 of 2013 IN Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 804 of 2008 Rajesh Toppo Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD For the Appellant : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. M.B. Lal, A.P.P. 6/24th of September, 2013 Oral Order : Per D.N. Patel, J.1. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the present applicant-Rajesh Toppo (original accused no.1) under Section 389(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence awarded by 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gumla vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22nd of January, 2008 and 24th of January, 2008 respectively in S.T. No. 110 of 2005, whereby present applicant-Rajesh Toppo (original accused no.1) along with other co-convict was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 to be read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and other Section of ...
ignus Tamagaria Vs. the Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of I ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 7141 of 2012 --- Ignus Tamagaria --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Iron and Steel, New Delhi & others--- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s Bibhash Sinha, Arpan Mishra, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Prabhash Kumar, CGC --- 03/ 24.09.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. This petitioner has approached this Court for seeking a direction upon the respondent nos. 2 and 3 for consideration of his case for compassionate appointment in lieu of death of his father on 16th April 2009 while working as Gradener in the said organization.3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his father was on election duty for conduct of Lok Sabha Poll 2009 when he died on 16th April 2009 leaving behind his two sons and one daughter. He has made representation before the respondents duly forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi vide...
Philip Marianus Toppo Vs. the State of Jharkhand Throuh Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.2338 of 2013 Philip Marianus Toppo @ Filip Marianus Toppo...Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I........... .....Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani For the C.B.I :Mr. M.Khan 3/ 24.9.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I on the interlocutory application bearing no.6664 of 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer which had been made in the main application was for quashing of the order dated 29.7.2013 but since that copy of the order was not annexed with the petition, an objection was raised by the office and thereby this interlocutory application has been filed whereby certified copy of the order dated 29.7.2013 has been brought on record. Mr.Sahani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on account of recommendation being made by the committee to which this ...
Tej Narayan Sharma Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2888 of 2013 Tej Narayan Sharma ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. S.N.P. Rai For the State: Mr. Prem Prakash, APP 2/24.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Gorakhnath Choudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3610 of 2013 Gorakhnath Choudhary ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State: Mr. P.K. Jaiswal, APP 2/24.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »