Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suraj Mishra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2718 of 2013 Suraj Mishra ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Pran Pranay For the State: Mr. Prem Prakash, APP 2/19.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Santosh Kumar Khetan Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.777 of 2008 Santosh Kumar Khetan ...................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.N.K.Pasari 30/ 19.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that FIR had been challenged but during pendency of this application, final form was submitted whereby the petitioner has been exonerated from accusation and therefore, this application has become infructuous and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. In view of the submission, let this application be dismissed as infructuous. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Smt Bina Shourie Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1728 of 2013 Smt. Bina Shourie... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ananda Sen For the State: Mr. V.K. Tiwary, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Krishna Murari 9/19.09.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case after one week. Interim order dated 16.05.2013 is hereby vacated. Let this order be communicated to the court below for taking appropriate steps for arrest of the petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Mazidan Bibi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7811 of 2013 Mazidan bibi Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the Respondents : A.P .P. 05/ 19.09.2013 Call for a status report and the expected time to conclude the trial from the Court concerned. List this case after two weeks. (D. N. Upadhyay, J.) NKC...
Rajiv Pathak Vs. P.K.Verma and Arn.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.79 of 1997 (R) with M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R) 1. State of Bihar 2. D.F.O., Saranda Forest Division (Territorial), Chaibasa Petitioners (Civil Review No.79 of 1997 (R)) Versus Rajeev Pathak Respondent Rajiv Pathak .............. Petitioner (in M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R)) Versus 1. Sri P.K. Verma 2. Sri Pradip Kumar ................. Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate (in M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R)) M.J.C. No.488 of 1997(R) 08/ 19.09.2013 Since the order dated 17.10.1996 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3455 of 1996(R) has been complied with in respect of sale of Sagwan tree and transit permit has been granted and the tree has already been sold by the petitioner, he has no grievance now. In view of the submissions, M.J.C. No....
Bseb Vs. S.K.Ram
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.67 of 1997 (R) The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna & Others Petitioners Versus Sudhir Kumar Ram Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY 11/ 19.09.2013 Nobody appears on behalf of either of the parties. Learned senior counsel Sri V. Shivnath appeared and informed that he is not in the panel of Bihar Secondary School Examination Board, Patna and the file has already been taken from him long back. This civil review has been filed with a prayer to review the order dated 14.07.1997 passed in C.W.J.C. No.1846 of 1997 (R). From perusal of the said order it appears that the counsel appearing for the parties were not present and therefore, after giving some directions said C.W.J.C. No.1846 of 1997(R) was disposed of. Today also nobody appears on behalf of either of the part...
Aditya Fogla and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1563 o1. Aditya Fogla 2. Sita Ram Fogla @ Sitaram Fogla 3. Chanda Devi @ Chandra Devi @ Chanda Devi Fogla 4. Brij Kishore Fogla @ Brij Kishore Agarwal . Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate ----- 02/19.09.2013: This application is directed against the order dated 24.08.2012 passed in Cr. Revision No.42 of 2012 by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur whereby and whereunder revisional court, having setting aside the order passed under Section 203 Cr.P.C. by learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, has referred the matter before learned Judicial Magistrate, for holding enquiry under Section 398 Cr.P.C. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the record, it does appear that revisional court has passed the imp...
Rajesh Keshari and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3901 o1. Rajesh Keshari 2. Bharat Keshari ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. M.B. Lal For the State: Mr. Krishna Shankar, APP 2/19.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Khalek Master ? Md. Khalique Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.999 of 2008 Khalek Master @ Md. Khalique.....................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Md.A.Haque 3/ 19.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Banmali Saha Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1573 of 2013 Banmali Saha @ Banmali Sah . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : APP ----- 02/19.09.2013: Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State and taking into account the allegation constituting offence under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 120(B), 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, I do not find it a fit case for quashing of the first information report of Amrapara P.S. Case No.31 of 2013 (G.R. No.493 of 2013). Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Notwithstanding, the application got dismissed, the points which have been raised by this petitioner, in this application, shall be available, at an appropriate stage. (R.R. Prasad, J.) Ravi...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »