Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Law Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6995 of 2013 Sonu Dubey Versus The State of Jharkhand with B. A. No. 7055 of 2013 Law Singh Versus The State of Jharkhand with B. A. No. 7071 of 2013 Kush Singh Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. S.S. Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 19.09.2013 All these three bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Sadar (Town) P.S. Case No. 166 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 707 of 2011. The case relates to abduction and murder of the brother of the informant and the case was instituted against unknown. It appears that other ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 367 of 2012 Court on its own motion Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV KUMAR GUPTA For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Murari, A.C. For the RespondentState : Mr. Rajesh Shankar, G.A. 15/Dated: 19th September, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.1. Learned counsel appearing for the Amicus Curiae, in pursuance of the order dated 06.02.2013, has submitted in detail about the behaviour of respondents No.15 &16 and how malafidely this litigation has been instituted. In detail the order passed by this Court on 06.02.2013 has also been read over .2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.11 has also submitted in detail that how they have also become victim of harassment of respondent No.15 & 16. It is also submitt...
Kamlesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1983 of 2013 Kamlesh Kumar Srivastava ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Pratiush Lala For the State: Mr.V.K. Tiwary, APP 5/19.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Chitranjan Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1970 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1976 of 2013 Jagdish Prasad ... ....Petitioner(in ABA 1970/2013) Chitranjan Prasad Singh.... ....Petitioner ( in ABA 1976/2013) Vs. The State of Jharkhand through CBI ....Opposite Party( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi ( in both cases) For the CBI: Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan( in both cases) 7/19.09.2013: Anticipatory bail applications filed by petitioner Jagdish Prasad ( petitioner in ABA No. 1970 of 2013) and Chitranjan Prasad Singh ( petitioner in ABA No. 1976 of 2013) are heard together as they arose from the same FIR. Heard Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Md. Mokhtar Khan, learned counsel for the CBI. It appears that petitioners are bank employees. The main allegation against them that they have wrongly scrutinized the documents furnished by different applicants for grant of loan with a view to favour the...
Sunil Manjhi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4673 of 2013 Sunil Manjhi @ Suni Manjhi @ Badka Sunil @ Lambu. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahaesh Tewari For the State: Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 3, APP 6/19.09.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Sunil Manjhi @ Suni Manjhi @ Badka Sunil @ Lambu in connection with Deori P.S. Case No. 167 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. No. 2284 of 2007 ( S.T. No. 344 of 2011) pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge 1 st , Giridih is moved by Sri Mahesh Tewari and opposed by Sri Manoj Kumar No. 3, learned Additional P.P. Earlier, bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the merit of the case. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that at the earlier occasion, the bail prayer of this petitioner rejected mainly taking into account the statement of witness Uday Sao. He submits that the statement of Uday Sao has already been r...
Jogendra Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2976 of 2013 Jogendra Yadav ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Tewari For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha, APP 2/19.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Rabindra Nath Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.956 of 2008 Rabindra Nath ...................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.G.K.Sinha For the State ;A.P.P 8.19.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this application has been filed for quashing of the FIR but while the matter was pending, charge sheet was submitted, upon which cognizance of the offence has been taken and therefore, the order taking cognizance though has been brought on record but has not been challenged and therefore, the matter be posted in the next week so that in the meantime, he may file proper application. As prayed for, let this matter be listed in the next week. Till then, interim order passed on 28.4.2011 shall continue. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Brinda ? Birendra Prajapati ? Birendra Mahto Praja Vs. State of Jharkh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 198 of 2008 ----- Brinda @ Birendra Prajapati @ Birendra Mahto Prajapati- .... ... .... .... .... Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Respondent ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : Mr. M.B.Lal, A.P.P. ----- I.A. No.6257 o6. 19.09.2013 Learned counsel for the appellant has not pressed this Interlocutory Application. Accordingly, I.A. No.6257 of 2013 stands rejected as not pressed. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) (P.P. Bhatt, J.) SI/...
Pintu Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2484 of 2013 Pintu Paswan ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Rishi Pallav For the State: Mr. Moti Gope, APP 2/19.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Gopal Majumadar Alias Gopal Mazumdar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3665 o1. Gopal Majumadar @ Gopal Mazumdar 2. Tapan Majumadar @ Tapan Mazumdar 3. Mridum Majumadar@ Mridum Mazumdar... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. K.K. Mishra For the State: Mr. Vikash Kishore, APP 2/19.09.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioenr that petitioner no. 2, namely, Tapan Majumadar @ Tapan Mazumdar has already been arrested, therefore, anticipatory bail application filed on his behalf has become infructuous. Accordingly, anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner no. 2, namely, Tapan Majumadar @ Tapan Mazumdar is dismissed as infructuous. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »