Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sita Ram Mahto and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Appeal [SJ] No. 525 o1. Sita Ram Mahto 2. Lutan Mahto 3. Sona Ram Mahto 4. Kedar Nath Mahto 5. Nakul Mahto 6. Munthi @ Munshi Mahto 7. Kuleshwar Mahto 8. Shiva Mahto 9. Luthu Mahto 10. Chaman Mahto ..... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Respondent(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Appellant(s) : M/s Bibhash Sinha, Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocates For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /20.09.2013. Admit. Issue notice. Call for the L.C.R. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned counsel appearing for the State on the matter of bail. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that so far the appellants No.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10, are concerned, they were charged under Sections 147, 148, 427/ 149, 380/ 149 of the Indian Penal Code, but they were convicted for the aforesaid offences and also for the offence under Section 307 /149 I.P.C. though they had not been charged for the said offence and ther...
Pramod Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 535 of 2013 Pramod Choudhary ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another ..... Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deva Kant Rai, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 20.09.2013 This application will be heard. Admit. Call for the Lower Court Records. Issue notice to opposite party No. 2, for which requisites etc., must be filed within one week through registered cover with A/D as also through ordinary process, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. During the pendency of this revision application, realisation of fine and compensation from the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. (H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Girish Lohar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.App.(S.J) No.706 of 2013 Girish Lohar ...............................Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand ........................Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Appellant: Mr. Awanish shekhar For the State :A.P.P 2/20.9.13. This appeal is admitted for hearing. Issue notice. Call for the lower court record. The provisional bail granted to the above named appellant by the Sessions Judge, Godda in S.C. No.218 of 2009 is hereby confirmed. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Arvind Kumar Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
WRIT PETITION (C).No. 4985 of 2006 (In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ) Arvind Kumar Verma @ Arvind Verma Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Urmila Devi . . . . . . Respondents. ----- For the Petitioners : Miss Nehala Sharmin For the Respondents : M/s Ayush Aditya & S.Shekhar & A.Verma JC to (L&C) ----- Reserved on :29. 08.2013 Pronounced on :20. 09/2013 ----- PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ----- Prashant Kumar,J.This writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 27.07.2006 passed by Sub-Judge-I,Dumka in Title Execution Case No.02/1994, whereby and where under he rejected the rejoinder filed by petitioner/judgment debtor and allowed the application of respondent/ decree holder and issued order for delivery of possession in favour of decree holder.2. Respondent no.2 has filed a suit bearing Title Eviction Suit No.24/79 against the petitioner and others for their eviction from the suit property, descr...
Smt.Sabitri SahuwaIn and anr Vs. Parmeshwar Lal Gupta and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 62 of 2003 Smt. Sabitri Sahuwain & Anr. ..Appellants Versus Parmeshwar Lal Gutgutiya & Anr. ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellants : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. L.K. Lal, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 3731 of 2013 & I.A. No. 5491 o16. 20-09-2013 In I.A. No. 3731 of 2013, the appellants have prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of this appeal. In I.A. No. 5491 of 2013, the respondents have made the same prayer for fixing an early date of hearing. In both the applications, there are almost common grounds. The appellants as well as respondent no. 1 have claimed themselves as senior citizens and sufficiently aged persons in 70s or 80s and both of them want hearing. Considering the grounds mentioned in the said applications, both the I.As are allowed. Office is directed to list this case under the heading "For Hearing" on 29.11.2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Ramjee Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.App. (D.B) No.1342 of 2008 Ramjee Yadav............................. Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand ..................... ....Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Appellant :Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the State : A.P.P 5.19.9.13. I.A.No.5252 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the State. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that though earlier the prayer for bail of this appellant was rejected but the appellant has been renewing the prayer for bail as the most striking feature of the case could not be placed earlier. In this regard, it was submitted that the prosecution has utterly failed to prove the case that this appellant and also co-convict shot dead the deceased as the inquest report as well as post mortem report which has been led in this case by the prosecution are of unknown person, though, as per t...
Md SahajuddIn Sheikh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1604 of 2013 Md. Sahajuddin Sheikh . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : APP ----- 02/19.09.2013: Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State and taking into account the allegation constituting offence under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 120(B), 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, I do not find it a fit case for quashing of the first information report of Amrapara P.S. Case No.31 of 2013 (G.R. No.493 of 2013). Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Notwithstanding, the application got dismissed, the points which have been raised by this petitioner, in this application, shall be available, at an appropriate stage. (R.R. Prasad, J.) Ravi...
State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Rajeev Pathak
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.79 of 1997 (R) with M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R) 1. State of Bihar 2. D.F.O., Saranda Forest Division (Territorial), Chaibasa Petitioners (Civil Review No.79 of 1997 (R)) Versus Rajeev Pathak Respondent Rajiv Pathak .............. Petitioner (in M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R)) Versus 1. Sri P.K. Verma 2. Sri Pradip Kumar ................. Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate (in M.J.C. No.488 of 1997 (R)) M.J.C. No.488 of 1997(R) 08/ 19.09.2013 Since the order dated 17.10.1996 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3455 of 1996(R) has been complied with in respect of sale of Sagwan tree and transit permit has been granted and the tree has already been sold by the petitioner, he has no grievance now. In view of the submissions, M.J.C. No....
Ashim Chakraborty Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8812 of 2013 Ashim Chakraborty ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : - Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P .P. 04/19.09.2013 While rejecting the bail application of petitioner on 11.01.2013, the trial court was directed to conclude the trial within six months. It is submitted that still the trial has not been concluded because prosecution has not produced witnesses. It is submitted that up till now out of 11 charge-sheeted witnesses only six witnesses examined. Under the said circumstance, Superintendent of Police, Bokaro is directed to remain physically present in this Court on 26.09.2013 at 10:30 a.m. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/ ...
Kishori Prasad Mehta ? Karu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1506 of 2007 ----- Kishori Prasad Mehta @ Karu .... .... Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Respondent ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Appellant : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.V. Kumar, A.P.P. ----- I.A. No.6133 o3. 19.09.2013 In this Interlocutory Application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail, during the pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's same prayer was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than seven years; the appellant has been convicted under Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and has been sentenced to undergo 14 years' R.I. and also fine of Rs.50,000/-. Co-convict namely Naresh Prasad Mehta, whose conviction is also based on the same set of facts and evidence and who has filed separate appeal, has been gr...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »