Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murli Thakur and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 349 of 2013 Murli Thakur and others... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh For the State: Mr. Pramod Kumar Choudhary 2/20.09.2013: This application has been filed for modification or order dated 02.01.2013 passed in ABA No. 2602 of 2012 and ABA No. 1756 of 2012 whereby petitioners were granted bail by this Court with stipulation that they surrender in the court below on 16.01.2013. This court also directed O.P. No. 2 that she also remain physically present in the court on that date so that petitioners took her to their house for keeping her as wife of petitioner Om Prakash Thakur, with all love and affection. It is submitted that on 16.01.2013, all the petitioners went to the Civil Court, Tenughat for surrendering and they served a copy of the surrender petition on learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. It is further ...
Janki Rabidas Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2438 of 2013 Janki Rabidas .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mrs. Rakhi Rani,Adv. For the State: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, APP 3/20.09.2013: Anticipatory Bail application filed by Janki Rabidas is moved by Sri Rakhi Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Abhishek Kumar, learned Additional P.P. This is a case under Sections 304 (B) of Indian Penal Code and 3/4 D.P. Act. Petitioner is elder brother -in-law of the deceased. In the first information report, no allegation made against this petitioner that he tortured the deceased for demand of dowry. It further appears from the petition filed by the informant in the court below that he arrayed petitioner out of anger and on being instigated by friends and relatives. In the said application informant further stated that in fact petitioner has no hand in commission of present crim...
Gulam Rasul Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1248 of 2013 Gulam Rasul ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. S.S. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 20.09.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Sattam Mahto and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Appeal [SJ] No. 524 o1. Sattam Mahto 2. Lakhan Mahto 3. Kisto Mahto 4. Puran Mahto ..... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Respondent(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Appellant(s) : M/s Bibhash Sinha, Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocates. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 / 20.09.2013. Admit. Issue notice. Call for the L.C.R. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned counsel appearing for the State on the matter of bail. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that so far the appellants No.2, 3 and 4, namely, Lakhan Mahto, Kisto Mahto and Puran Mahto are concerned, they were charged under Sections 147, 148, 427/ 149, 380/ 149 of the Indian Penal Code, but were convicted for the aforesaid offences and also for the offence under Section 307 /149 I.P.C. though they had been charged for the said offence and thereby, the court did commit illegality in convicting those appellants for the offence udner S...
Sanny Kumar Alias Nishesh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 104 of 2013 ----- Sanni Kumar @ Nishesh Singh ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... .. Respondents ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rangan Mukhapadhyay ----- 5/ 20.09.2013 With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, put up this case in the first week of December, 2013. Interim order, if any, will be extended till then. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) SI/...
Devashish Saha Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.App.(S.J) No.711 of 2013 Devashish Saha ...............................Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance.....Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Appellant: Mr. Awanish shekhar For the Vigilance :Mr.Shailesh 2/20.9.13. This appeal is admitted for hearing. Issue notice. Call for the lower court record. The provisional bail granted to the above named appellant by the Special Judge, (Vigilance),Dumka in Special case Vigilance No.20 of 2001 is hereby confirmed. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Ms Munshiram Trading Company Private Ltd Vs. Harshit Power and Ispat P ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Company Petition No. 04 of 2012 M/s Munshiram Trading Company Private Ltd., Durg, Chattisgarh . Petitioner Versus Harshit Power & Ispat Private Limited, Giridih .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Saboo, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate 07/Dated: 20 th September, 2013 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitionerCompany had paid Rs. 50 Lakhs by cheque to the respondentCompany and despite several requests, they have failed to make payment and, therefore, this petition has been preferred under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondentCompany.2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that they are disputing their liability to make the payment of the aforesaid amount. It is furthe...
Laxman Ram and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 2920 of 2011 Laxman Ram & Others ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : J.C. to G.A. ---- 21/20-09-2013 In spite of the order and reminders, the record of Zamabandi Case No. 1/1952-53 has not been received. It has been submitted that the said record is lying with the Additional Collector, Ranchi. The Additional Collector, Ranchi is directed to appear in this Court in person on the next date fixed so that appropriate order for non compliance of the order of this Court be passed in his presence. Put up this case on 18th October, 2013. Till then, the interim order dated 08.08.2011 shall continue. Learned J.C. to G.A. assured this Court to convey this order to the Additional Collector, Ranchi. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Jagdish Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.App.(S.J) No.722 of 2013 Jagdish Paswan ...............................Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand ..............................Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Appellant: Mr. Awanish Shekhar For the State :A.P.P 2/20.9.13. This appeal is admitted for hearing. Issue notice. Call for the lower court record. The provisional bail granted to the above named appellant by the Additional Judge IV-cum-Special Judge, C.B.I, Dhanbad in R.C. No.01(A) of 2006(D) is hereby made absolute subject to payment of fine amount. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Motilal Prasad and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc. Appeal No.101 of 2005 The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East Petitioner Versus 1. Motilal Prasad 2. Anil Agarwal 3. Ram Dayal Singh Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate For the Respondents : None 15/ 20.09.2013 Present appeal has been preferred by M/s New India Assurance company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned 1st Addl. District Judge cum Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Jamshedpur in connection with Compensation Case No.21 of 2000 whereby and whereunder the claim application filed by respondent No.1 has been allowed and the appellant has been directed to pay the awarded amount with interest, as indicated in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »