Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Narayan Kumhar Alias Narayan Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1527 of 2013 Narayan Kumhar @ Narayan Kumar... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar For the State: Mrs. Niki Sinha, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. P.C. Jha 6/25.09.2013: It appears that petitioner has filed a matrimonial suit bearing Matrimonial Suit No. 253 of 2012. In that suit, a joint compromise petition filed on behalf of both the parties wherein, it is stated that complainant took Rs. 1,00,000/- from the petitioner and agreed to live separately and both the parties cordially wants to dissolve their marital relation. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 submits that he will file rejoinder to the supplementary affidavit, filed on behalf of petitioner. Put up this case after four weeks. In the meantime, petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with C.P. Case No. 2255 of 2012 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistra...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6742 of 2013 Shankar Mahto ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP 5/25.09.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Shankar Mahto in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 283 of 2011 ( G.R. o. 2211 of 2011, S.T. No. 181 of 2012) pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih is moved by Sri P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate and opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected with observation that the trial court will conclude the trial within six months. It is submitted by learned Additional P.P. that the case of prosecution had already been closed. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this state. Accordingly, his bail application rejected. However, I direct the trial court t...
Tag this Judgment!Ramjeet Hembrom Alias Sanjhila Da Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8891 of 2013 Ramjeet Hembrom @ Sanjhila Da... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State: Mr. P.K. Sinha , APP 4/25.09.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Ramjeet Hembrom @ Sanjhila Da is moved by Sri P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate and opposed by Sri P.K. Sinha, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected on two occasions. However, while disposing of the second bail application, this court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months. It is submitted that out of six witnesses, four had already been examined but they have not supported the case of prosecution. It further appears that the petitioner is in custody from 04.02.2009. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on ba...
Tag this Judgment!Prithevi Dubey Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1622 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1629 of 2013 Prithevi Dubey.........Petitioner ( in ABA 1622/13) 1. Aminder Dubey @ Amrendra Dubey 2. Asha Devi 3. Sahinder Dubey @ Shalendra Kumar Dubey @ Satendra Kumar Dubey 4. Prem Lata Devi 5. Sachindra Dubey @ Sachin Kumar Dubey .....Petitioners ( in ABA 1629/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties ( in both the cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary ( in both the cases) For the State: Mr. Awanikant Prasad ,APP ( in ABA 1622/13) Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP ( in ABA 1629/13) For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Shailesh 7/25.09.2013: It is alleged in the complaint petition that Government has granted Rs. 35,000/- to the complainant towards Indira Vikas Yojana and the said money was snatched by the petitioners. Under the said circumstance, O.P. No. 2 is directed to file supplementary counter affidavit annexing the sanction order by which Rs. 35...
Tag this Judgment!Aminder Dubey Alias Amrendra Dubey and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1622 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1629 of 2013 Prithevi Dubey.........Petitioner ( in ABA 1622/13) 1. Aminder Dubey @ Amrendra Dubey 2. Asha Devi 3. Sahinder Dubey @ Shalendra Kumar Dubey @ Satendra Kumar Dubey 4. Prem Lata Devi 5. Sachindra Dubey @ Sachin Kumar Dubey .....Petitioners ( in ABA 1629/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties ( in both the cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary ( in both the cases) For the State: Mr. Awanikant Prasad ,APP ( in ABA 1622/13) Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP ( in ABA 1629/13) For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Shailesh 7/25.09.2013: It is alleged in the complaint petition that Government has granted Rs. 35,000/- to the complainant towards Indira Vikas Yojana and the said money was snatched by the petitioners. Under the said circumstance, O.P. No. 2 is directed to file supplementary counter affidavit annexing the sanction order by which Rs. 35...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Sunita Sinha Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2047 of 2013 --- Smt. Sunita Sinha --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Tripurari Prasad, Advocate For the State: JC to GP-II --- I.A. Nos. 7473/2013 & 7474/2013 --- 05/ 25.09.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ application being aggrieved by the order dated 01st February 2013 (Annexure-7) issued by the Respondent No. 4 - District Social Welfare Officer, Giridih, whereby her services as Aanganwari Sevika, has been terminated.3. It is the contention of the petitioner that she has been working regularly since 25 years on the said post at Aanganwari Kendra of Karihari (East), Giridih, but the impugned order, on the face of it, has been passed after giving only three days notice to respond to the allegations by letter no. 122 dated 22st January 2013...
Tag this Judgment!Ayub Ansari Alias Jehad Alam Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7233 of 2013 Ayub Ansari @ Jehad Alam Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Priyadershi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:24. h September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been remanded in this case from another case on the basis of his confessional statement. That, the confessional statement has been forcibly recorded by the police. That no incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. That, the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2012 and the charge has been framed on 21.02.2013. Despite lapse of more than six months no witness have been e...
Tag this Judgment!Krishna Lohra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8874 of 2013 Krishna Lohra ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak For the State: Mr. S. S. Sahay, APP 3/24.09.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Krishna Lohra is moved by Sri Ajay Kumar Pathak and opposed by Sri S.S. Sahay, learned Additional P.P. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for about two years and seven months. It further appears from the impugned order that the petitioner is in custody from 06.10.2012. Considering the period of detention, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 32 of 2005 ( G.R. No. 1720 of 2005, S.T. No. 774 of 2005), ...
Tag this Judgment!Kavita Devi Alias Kavita Jha Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 7301 of 2012 --- Kavita Devi @ Kavita Jha --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State: JC to SC-1 --- 02/ 24.09.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the order dated 15th June 2012 contained in letter no. 511 issued by the respondent no. 4 - the Child Development Project Officer, Chas (Gramin), Bokaro, whereby her services as Aanganbari Sahaiyka in Aanganbari Centre Girdhartand under panchayat Kashibhandariya, Chas, has been terminated.3. It is the case of the petitioner that she was appointed on the said post after following the due procedure and the decision of the Aam Sabha by letter dated 18th October 2004 (Annexure-1). She assumed the charge on 01st October 2005 and had also participated in the training. There has been ...
Tag this Judgment!Amar Kumar Sahu Vs. Mohammad MoIn and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1525 of 2012 With I.A. (Cr.) No. 1206 of 2012 --- Amar Kumar Sahu ..... Petitioner Versus Mohammad Moin and Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate. For the respondents : - -- 05/24.09.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Cr. Misc. Petition along with I.A.(Cr.) No. 1206/2012 . Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this Cr. Misc. Petition along with aforesaid interlocutory application stands rejected as withdrawn. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) /- Anu (P.P. Bhatt, J.)...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »