Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Ghose and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7605 o1. Sanjay Ghose 2. Lucchu Saw @ Luchhu Teli 3. Chhotu Ansari @ Rahmat @ Babu Ansari ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 461. 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chandankiary (Amlabad) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 416 of 2013. The case relates to theft of batteries from the Tower of Reliance Mobile. The petitioners were not apprehended at the spot, rather, they were named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Sanjay Ghose, Lucchu Saw @ Luchhu Teli and Chhotu Ansari @ Rahmat @ Babu Ansari, on bail. Ac...
Shyam Kishore Prasad Vs. Revenue Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3715 of 2012 Shyam Kishore Prasad .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand and others........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Pravin Kumar Pandey For the Resp. Nos. 1 to 8: Mr. Vikash Kishore Prasad S.C. ( L &C) For the Resp. No. 8: Ms. Sweety Toppo 8/22.08.2013: This writ application has been filed for a direction commanding the respondents to pay compensation of the land pertaining to Khata No. 45, Plot No. 594 of Village- Kankebar, which has been acquired by respondents for construction of National High Way. It is submitted that one Harilal Mahto get his name mutated against the land in question on the basis of a Sada Settlement made by Ex-landlord in the Sambat 1992. It is further stated that the petitioner purchased the said land form aforesaid Hari Lal Mahto in the year 1980 and came into possession of the land. It is then submitted that suddenly his land acquired by Resp. No. ...
Sheru Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5833 of 2013 Sheru Khan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 6/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 147, 323, 341, 342, 448, 354, 307, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No. 39 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 384 of 2009, S.T. No. 363 of 2011. The case was instituted on the basis of fardbeyan of one Kamlesh Paswan, who had stated that he had gone out of his house and when he returned back after about five months, he found that lock was broken. It is further alleged that four to five persons fled away from the house and when he entered the house, he found that his articles were missing and large quantity of coal ...
Har NaraIn Lakhotia Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No.1531 of 2011 Har Narain Lakhotia Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the State : Sr.S.C.II For the C.B.I. : Md. Mokhtan Khan ------ 14/22.08.2013: The C.B.I. has submitted its status report. The Registrar shall preserve the said status report in a sealed cover. We perused the report. Learned Sr.S.C.II submitted that letters were written to the concerned Department regarding the order dated 2nd July, 2013, but no reply has come. He further submitted that the officers from the State Government and other authorities are present in the Court and they have assured that affidavit shall be filed in compliance of the order dated 2nd July, 2013. For that purpose, learned counsel prays for three weeks' time. Though sufficient time was already given to the State to file affidavit...
Hargauri Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.180 of 2003 Hargauri Mandal Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A. No.5885 o12. 22.08.2013: In this application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. It has been submitted that though the appellant's same prayer was earlier rejected in 2010, he has remained in custody for more than ten years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; there is no eye-witness in the case; the deceased died due to drowning into the well, as would be evident from the medial evidence. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer, but has not disputed the period of custody. Regard being had to the long period of custody and other facts and circumstances of the case, the a...
Sujit Kumar Singh Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(PIL)No.3854of2013 SujitKumarSingh ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM :HONEBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.ShresthGautam,Advocate FortheState :Mr.RajeshKumar,G.P.V FortheKolhanUniversity :Mr.SanjoyPiprawall,Advocate nd 05/Dated:22 August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.1. Counselappearingforthepetitioner,uponinstructionfromhis client,seekspermissiontowithdrawthispetition.2. Permission,asprayedfor,isgranted.3. Thepresentpetitionisdismissedaswithdrawn. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Manish/R.K....
Baleshwar Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1101 of 2013. ----- Baleshwar Kumar Yadav @ Bateshwar Kumar Yadav @ Bateshwar Yadav Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : Sri S.P. Jha, A.P.P. ----- 07/22.08.2013. Anticipatorsy bail application filed by Baleshwar Kumar Yadav @ Bateshwar Kumar Yadav @ Bateshwar Yadav is moved by Sri A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.P. Jha, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that co-accused Satish Chandra Arora had executed power of attorney in favour of petitioner by impersonating himself as informant. It appears that thereafter petitioner sold the land in favour of his wife. It further appears that later on, when petitioner came to know about the illegality in execution of power of attorney, he filed a complaint case vide complaint case no.12 of 2012 against t...
Chandra Shekhar Kuila Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7612 of 2013 Chandra Shekhar Kuila ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 379, 411 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No. 145 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 3472 of 2012. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Chandra Shekhar Kuila, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri R. S. Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur...
Jhethal Ghosh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7619 of 2013 Jhethal Ghosh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 3(a) of the R.P. (U.P.) Act, in connection with Barharwa RPF (Post) Case No. 13 of 2013 corresponding to R.P.S. Case No. 18 of 2013. The petitioner was apprehended with stolen railway fish plates. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Jhethal Ghosh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, in connection with...
Rajesh Banra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1791 of 2004 Rajesh Banra Appellant. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT ------ For the Appellant : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A. No.5589 of 2013:4. /22.8.2013: In this interlocutory application, sole appellant- Rajesh Banra has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though his same prayer was earlier rejected in 2005, he has remained in custody for about 10 years; conviction of the appellant and others is based on circumstantial evidence; facts and circumstances on record create serious doubt about the complicity of the appellant; the judgment of conviction is based on presumption arising out of suspicion; the appeal is of the year 2004 and there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; other co-co...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »