Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alaxander Horo Alias Gender Horo and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 681 o1. Alaxander Horo @ Gender Horo 2. Dipesh Horo ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 23.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 2.7.2013 passed by learned 1st Addl. Judicial Commissioner, Khunti, in Criminal Appeal No. 136 of 2013, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 10.5.2013 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ranchi, in G.R. No. 354 of 2012, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile petitioners, has been dismissed by the learned Appellate Court below. The petitioners have been made accused in Karra P.S. Case No. 50 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 354 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 364, 302, 201, 120(B) / 34 of th...
iliyas Seikh Alias Iliyas Choudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7954 of 2013 Iliyas Seikh @ Iliyas Choudhary ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 23.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 414, 413 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 106 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 1234 of 2009 (S), S.T. No. 257 of 2013. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in transaction of stolen iron scraps. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Iliyas Seikh @ Iliyas Choudhary, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to t...
S.A.Wahab Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
1 W.P. (S) No. 5840 of 2004 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] ............ S.A.Wahab ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India 2. The Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Head Quarter, Patna 3. The Deputy Inspector General, CISF, Bokaro 4. The Commandant (Administration) CISF, Bokaro 5. The Deputy Commandant, CISF Unit M.B.R. and K.B.R., Meghatuburu, West Singhbhum.6. The Assistant Commandant, CISF Unit M.B.R. and K.B.R., Meghatuburu, West Singhbhum. ... Respondents. ............. For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Y.N.Mishra, C.G.S.C. ............ PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ------------ By Court The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the penalty order dated 14.11.2003 whereby, it has been ordered that the pay-scale of the petitioner would be reduced by two stages from Rs 3625-3455 to Rs 3200-85-4900 for 3 years with immediate effect an...
Deepak Kumar Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.962 of 2012 Deepak Kumar Jha .....................................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I and others.........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the C.B.I : Mr.M.Khan 21 / 23.8.13. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for adjudication of the issue involved in this case, charge sheet would be required to be looked into as the Superior Officer of the Bank against whom the case was also lodged and were responsible for grant of sanction of the loan had been exonerated whereas this petitioner who, at the relevant point of time, was the Branch Manager has been charge sheeted, though he had no role to play in the matter relating to sanction of grant of loan to the borrowers and therefore, the matter be posted after one week so that in the meantime, he may file a copy of the charge sheet. As prayed for, let...
Dashrath Prasad Vs. Agriculture and Sugar Cane Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)Nos.4118,4128&4305of2013 KarmaNathJha ... PetitionerinWP(S)4118/2013 DashrathPrasad ... PetitionerinWP(S)4128/2013 BashistaNarayanChoudhary PetitionerinWP(S)4305/2013 Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... Respondentsinallcases. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.RishiPallawa FortheRespondents :M/s. Jai Prakash, Sr. Advocate, Chaitail Sinha, J.C. to A.A.G & Anshuman Kumar,J.C.toSr.S.C.I. 523.8.2013 Heardcounselfortheparties. Thepetitioners,inthesethreewritpetitions,areaggrievedby theofficeorderdated28.6.2013ascontainedinmemono.781issued by the Director, Department of Soil Conservation, Government of Jharkhand,Ranchi,whereundertheirserviceshavebeenhandedover totheDirectorateofAgriculture. TheparentcadreofthesepetitionersisadmittedlyDirectorate ofAgricultureandnotDirectorateoftheSoilConservation,whichis notindispute.TheservicesofthepetitionersinW.P.(S)No.4118of 2013 were handed over by the Directorate of Agriculture to the...
M/S Sreegopal Automobiles Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.427 of 2012 M/s Sreegopal Automobiles. Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... Opposite Parties. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. V. Shivnath, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Parties : J.C. to S.C. (Mines) ------ 6/23.08.2013: When this case is taken up, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submitted that a reasoned order has been passed in compliance with the direction of this Court and it has been found that the claim of the petitioner is not admissible. Learned counsel submitted that the order of this Court is fully complied with. Mr. V. Shivnath, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the order is wholly erroneous, arbitrary and perfunctory. There is no compliance of the order as the opposite parties have refused the claim on frivolous ground. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused...
Jai Shankar Vishwakarma and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7084 o1. Jai Shankar Vishwakarma and others .. ... Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. J.C. to A.A.G. I.A. No. 5997 o4. 23.08.2013 This I.A. has been filed for listing this case under the heading for Admission. In view of the averments made in this application, I.A. No. 5997 of 2013 is allowed. Office is directed to list this case under the heading for Admission in the 3rd week of September 2013. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Nirmal Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.705 of 2013 Nirmal Das ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/23.8.2013 This application will be heard. Admit. Call for the lower court records. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to add the complainant as opposite party No.2 in this case. Let notice be issued to the opposite party No.2 through registered post as well as under ordinary process, requisites for which shall be filed within a week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. During the pendency of this application, the petitioner Nirmal Das shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri D. C. Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur, in connection with P....
Chandra Prakash Singh Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5141 of 2012 Chandra Prakash Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand &Ors ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jay Shankar Tiwary For the Respondents: Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra Re: I.A. No. 3470 of 2012, I.A. No. 2862 o6. 23.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing I.A. No. 3470 of 2012, accordingly the same is dismissed as not pressed. So far I.A. No. 2862 of 2013 is concerned, by filing this application, the petitioner has prayed that the Cold Storage locked by the respondents be unlocked. If the aforesaid prayer allowed, then the same will amount to allowing the main writ application. Thus, the aforesaid prayer cannot be allowed, at this stage. Office is directed to list I.A. No. 2862 of 2013 along with admission matter. Put up this case for admission in the 1st week of September, 2013. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Abid Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8086 of 2013 Abid Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/23.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.108 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1286 of 2013. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Abid Ansari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Hazaribagh, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.108 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1286 of 2013. (H. C. Mishra, J) ...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »