Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mata Sinku Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI I.A. No. 5581 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal(D.B.) No. 1900 of 2004 Mata Sinku .....Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Respondent ............. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ....... For the Petitioner :Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : A.P.P. ............ 05/Dated:27. h August, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.: I.A. No. 5581 o1. Counsel for the appellant has submitted that suffice will be for disposal of present application, for final hearing of criminal appeal be fixed.2. Having heard the counsel for the appellant and looking to the limited prayer and looking to the fact that appellant is in custody since 21st October, 2004 and also looking to the other facts of the case, we hereby direct the Registry of this Court to enlist this criminal appeal no. 1900 of 2004 on the Board 'For Final Hearing' on 16th September, 2013.3. I.A. No. 5581 of 2013 is hereby disposed of in view o...
State of Jharkhand and anr Vs. Dewashish Goswami and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI S.A.No.192of2009 StateofJharkhand&Anr. .Appellants. Versus DewashishGoswami&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI FortheAppellants : Mr.V.K.Prasad,S.C.(L&C) FortheRespondents : M/s.AmarKumarSinha& K.K.Mishra,Advocates 06/27.08.2013: ThisappealbytheappellantStateisagainstthejudgment and decree passed by the Additional District JudgeIII, HazaribaghinTitleAppealNo.23of2005,wherebythelearned Lower Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants.2. Therespondentswereplaintiffsinthelearnedcourtbelow.3. They had filed suit in the court of learned Munsif, Hazaribagh, seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining thedefendants from interfering withtheir right, title, interestandpossessionoverthesuitland.4. ThesuitlandasdescribedinScheduleAoftheplaintwas theland,appertainingtoKhataNo.309,PlotNo.3272,area2.30 acresofvillageRamgarh,P.S.&DistrictRamgarh.5. Accordingtotheplaintiffs,thesuitlandwasrecordedas Bakastint...
Mahesh Prasad Barnwal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Principal ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5166 of 2013 with W.P.(C) No.5176 of 2013 Ranjit Sahni & Ors. ...Petitioners (in W.P.(C) No.5166/2013) Mahesh Prasad Barnwal & Ors. ..Petitioners (in W.P.(C) No.5176/2013) -Versus- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... Respondents (in both the cases) ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioners : Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : M/s. Arbind Kumar Mehta & Navin Kr. Singh, J.C. to S.C.(Mines) ------ Reportable 3/27.08.2013: Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners prays for and is allowed to delete the name of respondent no. 5 from the cause title.2. Defect pointed out in W.P.(C) No.5176/2013 is ignored.3. Though these writ petitions have been listed under the heading 'For Orders', learned counsel addressed this Court on merit of the case and prayed for hearing and disposal thereof at this stage itself, in view of the nature of the impugned order.4. Af...
Ranjit Sahni and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Principal Secretar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5166 of 2013 with W.P.(C) No.5176 of 2013 Ranjit Sahni & Ors. ...Petitioners (in W.P.(C) No.5166/2013) Mahesh Prasad Barnwal & Ors. ..Petitioners (in W.P.(C) No.5176/2013) -Versus- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... Respondents (in both the cases) ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioners : Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : M/s. Arbind Kumar Mehta & Navin Kr. Singh, J.C. to S.C.(Mines) ------ Reportable 3/27.08.2013: Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners prays for and is allowed to delete the name of respondent no. 5 from the cause title.2. Defect pointed out in W.P.(C) No.5176/2013 is ignored.3. Though these writ petitions have been listed under the heading 'For Orders', learned counsel addressed this Court on merit of the case and prayed for hearing and disposal thereof at this stage itself, in view of the nature of the impugned order.4. Af...
Asharfi Lal Shah Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 953 of 2006 Dewanti Devi & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Niwas Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. L & C ----- I.A. No. 2051 o06. 26.08.2013 In this I.A., the petitioners have prayed for deletion of the name of Dewanti Devi, petitioner no. 1(i). It has been submitted that Dewanti Devi is the widow of Asharfi Lal Shah, the original writ petitioner. After the death of Asharfi Lal Shah, legal heirs were substituted including the applicant- Dewanti Devi as the petitioner no. 1(i). The said Dewanti Devi also died during pendency of this writ petition on 15.06.2010 leaving behind her sons, petitioner nos. 1(ii) to 1 (vi). Since all the heirs and legal representatives are already on record, there is proper representation of her estate. In view thereof, her name is required to be deleted from the cause title of...
Shanti HadIn Vs. the Managing Director Mineral Area Development Author ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.4981of2013 ShantiHadin ....Petitioner Versus TheManagingDirector,MRDA&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SomeshwarRoy,Adv. FortheRespondentsMADA :M/s.BhaweshKumar,RaviKumar& RahulKamlesh,Advs. 02/26.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The grievance of the petitionerwidow is that after the death of her husband, Late Mohana Hadi on 7th November, 2005, in harnessasaSafaiKarmiintheofficeofMineralAreaDevelopment Authority, Dhanbad, most of the deathcumretiral dues and other servicebenefitsofthepetitioner'shusbandhavenotbeenpaidtoher. The petitioner is said to have made representation vide Annexure2Series,beforetheCompetentAuthorityofM.A.D.A.,butof noavail.Therefore,shehasbeencompelledtomovethisCourt. Learned counsel for the RespondentsM.A.D.A submits that if the petitioner approaches the competent authority i.e. respondent no.1, Managing Director, M.A.D.A. through a proper representation, thesam...
Sashi Prakash Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4679 of 2013 Sashi Prakash ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. R. Mukhopadhyay, S.C.II ----- 9/26.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned S.C. II, appearing on behalf of the State.2. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 406/409/467/468/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No.52 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.379 of 2011.3. The petitioner was working as an Assistant Engineer in Zila Parishad, Chaibasa, and in view of the allegation against him to have misappropriated the huge amount of Government money, which was advanced to him for execution of different works under MANREGA scheme, the bail petition of this petitioner was earlier rejected on merits by order dated 16.1.2013 in B.A. No.2546 of 2012 by a detailed order. Suff...
Lalit Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Raj Kumari Devi and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI F.A.No.180of2009 LalitKumarJaiswal Appellant Versus RajKumariDevi&Others Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :Mr.RanjanKumar,Advocate FortheRespondents:Mr.PravinKumar,Advocate 09/26.08.2013 I.A.No.4979of2013hasbeenfiledonbehalfofR3BankeLalJaiswal on17.07.2013whenhewasalive. ItispointedoutthatsaidR3BankeLal Jaiswaldiedon30thJuly,2013andthereforethisI.A.hasbecomeinfructuous. Accordingly,I.A.No.4979of2013standsdismissedasnotpressed. Learnedcounselappearingfortheappellanthasprayedfortwoweeks timetofilepetitiontosubstitutethelegalheirsofR3lateBankeLalJaiswal. List this case after two weeks with liberty to the appellant to file substitutionpetition,ifany. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Bodhi Rai Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3154 of 2013 Bodhi Rai ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Nath For the State : A. P.P. ----- 7/26.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Pirtand P.S. Case No.41 of 2008, corresponding to G.R. No.2392 of 2008. (S.T. No.129 of 2012). The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant and the case was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, though has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner, but upon going through the case diary has submitted that the petitio...
Venkatesh Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No. 3903 of 2011 Venkatesh Prasad Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. I I.A. No. 4764 o04. 26.08.2013 By way of instant I.A. petitioner has prayed for early hearing of the application. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been twice reduced in the scale of pay. He has earlier moved this Court in W.P.S. No. 350 of 2010 against the order of punishment dated 11.12.2009. As per the stand of the respondents the reduced scale of pay in the basic scale has been made in accordance with the punishment order no. 2090 dated 11.12.2009. Accordingly, let the case appears along with W.P.S. No. 350 of 2010 in the list of cases where the 2010 matters are being listed. I.A. No. 4764 of 2013 stands disposed of. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »