Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Prakash Choudhary Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5348 of 2012 Jai Prakash Choudhary .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. 05/27.08.2013 The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that while he was posted as Police Constable at Dhanbad his salary for the month of January 1997 has not been paid. The respondents in their counter affidavit by relying upon Annexure-B dated 8.11.2012 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad stated that by the order dated 4.11.2012 it has been directed to adjust the petitioner on the rank of civil Jamadar since 1.1.1997 and direction has also been given to do the needful for the salary of the petitioner for the month of January, 1997. The answering respondent has also written a letter to I.G. Budget, Ranchi for allotment of due salary of Rs. 5471 to the petitioner vide memo...
Pradeep Kharia Kiro Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5914 of 2013 Pradeep Kharia (Kiro) ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Chaturvedy, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Palkot P.S. Case No. 55 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 692 of 2008, S.T No.72 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the direct allegation against the petitioner to have given fatal blow to the deceased, the bail application of this petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 26.7.2012 in B.A No. 4733 of 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that out of twelve witnesses, ten witnesses have already been examined....
Biren Singh Alias Balkeshwar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5869 of 2013 Biren Singh @ Balkeshwar Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kamdara P.S. Case No. 18 of 2011 corresponding to Spt.II. G.R. No. 337 of 2011, S.T No.291 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. From the FIR, it appears that there was an encounter between the police party and the members of the extremists group, including the petitioner. However, it appears from the FIR that there was no injury on the side of the police party. It also appears from the impugned order that other co-accused has been granted bail...
Christiana Hansda Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)No.17of2012 ChristianaHansda ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.DhananjayKumarDubey FortheRespondents :Mr.G.P.V. 527.8.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioner had approached this Court, inter alia, for quashing the Resolution No.5146 dated 19.9.2007 modified by ResolutionNo.8112dated13.12.2007,Annexures4and5respectively, whereunderadepartmentalproceedingwasinitiatedagainsther.She hadalsoapproachedthisCourtforadirectionupontherespondents toconsiderhercaseforpromotiontotherankofJointSecretaryinthe payscaleofRs.3740067000/witheffectfrom3.8.2009ontheground thatjuniortohernamely,UpendraNarayanOraonandPunaiOraon wereconsideredandpromotedwithallconsequentialbenefits,asthe petitionerisatserialno.309inthesenioritylistwhilethenamesof othertwopersonsareatserialnos.347and366respectively.Shewas also aggrieved on account of nonissuance of integrity cert...
Lakhan Prasad Mehta Alias Lakhan Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5641 of 2013 Lakhan Prasad Mehta @ Lakhan Prasad ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaiya S. Sahay For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/27.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.142 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.3363 of 2011. The case relates to murder of the daughter of the informant and from the FIR, it appears that she had gone for selling vegetables along with her mother and brother-in-law (the petitioner). Both of them had returned back to the house after leaving the deceased at the market place. Subsequently, the deceased was found traceless and her dead body was found from a dam. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the brothe...
Bilas Bhuian Alias Belas Bhuian Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6046 of 2013 Bilas Bhuian @ Belas Bhuian ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Prasad Sinha For the State : A. P.P. ----- 3/27.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Manatu P.S. Case No.09 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.518 of 2011. The case relates to murder of the brother of this petitioner, whose dead body was found and the case was instituted against unknown. The FIR was lodged by the son-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the evidence that the petitioner was last seen with the deceased. It has been submitted that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. Learned counsel ...
Shakila Khatoon Vs. Mohammad Ishteyaque Ansari Alias Bablu
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Tr.Petition(Civil)No.35of2012 ShakilaKhatoon Petitioner Versus MohammadIshtaqueAnsari@Bablu Opp.Party CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.M.K.Habib,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :Mr.AshrafuzzamanKhan,Advocate 05/27.08.2013 Thistransferpetitionhasbeenfiledu/s24oftheCivilProcedureCode fortransferringMatrimonialTitleSuitNo.10of2012fromtheCourtoflearned PrincipalJudge,FamilyCourt,GumlatotheCourtoflearnedPrincipalJudge, FamilyCourt,Ranchi. Itiscontendedthatoppositepartyhasalreadybeenappearinginother twocasespendingatRanchiwhereasthepetitioner,beingamuslimlady,shall facehardshipandinsecurityinattendingtheCourtatGumla. Learnedcounselappearingfortheoppositepartyhassubmittedthatheis beinghumiliatedbythefamilymembersofthepetitionerwheneverheappears inCourtatRanchi,therefore,thecasemaybetransferredtoanyindependent placewhichwillbefreefrominfluenceofboththeparties. Consideringthesubmissionsadvancedbylearnedcounselappearingfor the petitioner, I feel...
Murli Manjhi Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.1735of2013 MurliManjhi ....Petitioner Versus SteelAuthorityofIndiaLimited&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.NisithKumarSahani,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.RajivRanjan,Adv. 06/27.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Accordingtothepetitioner,hehadmovedearlierthisCourtinW.P.(S) No.2353of2005againsttheorderofterminationdated29thOctober,2003, whichisAnnexure2.The saidwritpetition wassought tobe withdrawn in ordertoavailtheremedyofdepartmentalappeal.Insuchcircumstances,the saidprayertowithdrawthewritpetitionwasallowedanditwasobservedthat intheeventtheappealisfiledwithinthreeweeks,theAppellateAuthorityshall hearanddisposeoftheappealwithinthreemonthsfromthedateoffilingof theappeal.Thereafter,thecontemptwasalsopursuedbeingContempt(Civil) CaseNo.369of2006,which,accordingtothepetitioner,wasdroppedon1st December,2006.Thepetitionerhadbeeninformedbeforethat,thatheshould preferanappealbeforetheChairman,Stee...
Santosh Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 2808 of 2012 Santosh Sharma ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. Mines ----- I.A. No. 1091 of 2013. 09/27.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to file reply to the application. Prayer is allowed. W.P.C. No. 2808 of 2012 Two weeks' time, as prayed for, is allowed for taking fresh steps for service of notice on respondent no. 4, by Registered post with A/d at his present and correct address, failing which this writ petition, as against the concerned respondent, shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Petitioner may use returned copy. Put up this case on 17th October, 2013. Interim order dated 17.05.2012 shall continue till the next date fixed. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Arjun Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.265 of 2013 Arjun Kumar ..............................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance ......Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.R.Krishna For the Vigilance :Mr.Shailesh 14/ 27.8.13. As prayed for on behalf of the Vigilance, lt this matter be listed on 3.9.2013 so that supplementary counter affidavit be filed in terms of the order dated 7.8.2013. At the same time, the Vigilance would be at liberty to state further fact which would be material for this case. Upon it, Mr. R.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that adequate opportunity has already been given. If the time is allowed, the Vigilance may not take further time on the next date. Let a copy of this order be handed over to the counsel appearing for the Vigilance for needful. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »