Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Budhram Herenj Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5977 of 2013 With B.A No. 6024 of 2013 Karma Kacchap ... Petitioner(B.A No.5977/13) Budhram Herenj ....... Petitioner(B.A No.6024/13) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Parties (In both cases) -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Md.Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 27.08.2013 Both these applications arise out of the same case and as such, these are being disposed of together by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Karra P.S. Case No. 62 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 433 of 2012, S.T No.225 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 302, 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the son of the informant, aged about 12 years and the petitioners and the other co-accused persons have been named in this case on the bas...
Kandey Pahan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5860 of 2013 Kandey Pahan ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Anil Kumar Ganjhu, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 120 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 331 of 2009, S.T Nos.139 of 2010 / 391 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the son of the informant and the informant is an eyewitness to the occurrence. Though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., but there is direct allegation against the other co-accused to have assaulted the deceased, causing his death. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Kandey Pahan on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, ...
Smt Priya Sahu Vs. Durbasa Sahu
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Tr.Petition(Civil)No.27of2012 Smt.PriyaSahu Petitioner Versus DurbasaSahu Opp.Party CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.MohitPrakash,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :Mr.MilanKumarDey,Advocate 06/27.08.2013 Thistransferpetitionhasbeenfiledu/s24oftheCivilProcedureCode for transferring Matrimonial Suit No.17 of 2012 from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa to the Court of learnedPrincipalJudge,FamilyCourt,Gumla. Itiscontendedthatfatherofthepetitionerhasalreadybeenmurdered andshehastomaintainherselffacinghardanditisnotpossibleforherto contest the suit filed by the opposite party at Chaibasa. The conveyance problemisalsotherebecausenodirectbusserviceortrainserviceisavailable betweenthetwostations. Learnedcounselfortheoppositepartyhasopposedtheargumentand submitted that he is ready to bear the cost, if petitioner appears before the CourtoflearnedPrincipalJudge,FamilyCourt,WestSinghbhum,Chaibasa. Consider...
Mossomat ? Mosamat Ganga ? Gan Vs. Dilip Kumar Chaurasia
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilRev.No.13of2012 MossomatGanga&Others Appellants Versus DilipKumarChaurasia Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellants :Mr.AtanuBanerjee,Advocate FortheRespondents:Mr.AshutoshKr.Singh,Advocate 07/27.08.2013 CallforthelowerCourtrecords. Theinerimorderdated05.10.2012shallcontinuetillthenextlisting. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Sanjay Kumar Kauntia Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1117 of 2013 Sanjay Kumar Kauntia........................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .......................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Kaustav Panda 3/ 27.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that since final form has been submitted whereby the petitioner has been exonerated from accusation, he may be permitted to withdraw this application Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Walim Khatoon Alias Halima Khatoon Alias Halim Khatoon and ors Vs. Sta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1236 o1. Walim Khatoon @ Halima Khatoon @ Halim Khatoon 2. Md. Razzak @ Md.Razzaque 3. Md. Wasim @ Babu 4. Md.Khalil 5. Md. Abdullah @ Papa.........................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .......................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.A,KDey 2/ 27.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Rakesh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1485 of 2012 Rakesh Kumar................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ......Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Rajan Raj For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Gautam Kumar 15/ 27.8.13. The grievance which the opposite party no.2 does have is that in terms of the order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, the husband though took her to Lar and kept her in a rented house but the husband started living at Mau with his parents and therefore, she would like to reside either at Mou or at Dewaria. However, leaned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is wrong on the part of the opposite party no.2 to say that the petitioner by keeping his wife at Lar in a rented house started to live with the parents. Right from the beginning, the petitioner was desirous to keep his wife at Lar as his work place would be nearer from that place and the...
Karma Kacchap Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5977 of 2013 With B.A No. 6024 of 2013 Karma Kacchap ... Petitioner(B.A No.5977/13) Budhram Herenj ....... Petitioner(B.A No.6024/13) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Parties (In both cases) -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Md.Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 27.08.2013 Both these applications arise out of the same case and as such, these are being disposed of together by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Karra P.S. Case No. 62 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 433 of 2012, S.T No.225 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 302, 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the son of the informant, aged about 12 years and the petitioners and the other co-accused persons have been named in this case on the bas...
Ranthu Sahu Alias Butaru Alias Vijay Mistri Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5906 of 2013 Ranthu Sahu @ Butaru @ Vijay Mistri ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Chaturvedy, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Palkot P.S. Case No. 3 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 41 of 2011, S.T No.190 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of one Dilkeshwar Prajapti, whose dead body was found and the case was instituted against unknown. In view of the statement of an eye witness, whose statement was recorded in paragraph 42 of the case diary, that the petitioner had assaulted the deceased, the bail application of this petitioner was earlier rejected on merits by order dated 5.9.2011 in B.A No. 3359 of ...
Advocate Association Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.5456of2013 in W.P.(PIL)No.2211of2010 AdvocateAssociation,throughGeneralSecretary, Ranchi ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughChiefSecretary, GovernmentofJharkhand,Ranchi&Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM :HONEBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate FortheState :Mr.AnilKumar,J.C.toA.G. th 57/Dated:27 August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.1. Counselappearingfortheapplicanthasnowreceivedananswer fromtheRegistrarGeneralofthisCourtdated22ndAugust,2013and inviewofthisletterwrittenbytheRegistrarGeneral,thisI.A.isnot pressedatthisstage.2. Accordingly,thisI.A.isdisposedofasnotpressedatthisstage. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Manish/R.K....
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »