Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jogendra Prasad Alias Yogendra Prasad and anr Vs. the State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2840 o1. Jogendra Prasad @ Yogendra Prasad 2. Hema Devi ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: M/s. Asha Jha For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Md JasimuddIn Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5229 of 2013 Md. Jasimuddin Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through CBI .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddhartha Jyoti Roy, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate -------- 5/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A of the Indian Penal Code, read with Section 13(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, in connection with R.C. Case No. 04(A)/2008(D). The case was initially instituted for fraud committed in disbursement of cash credits and term loans by Allahabad Bank, Kumardubi Branch, and the case was instituted against the then Branch Manager of the said branch. In the FIR, it finds mentioned that one M/s Noor Ceramics was sanctioned the cash credit of Rs. 10.00 lakhs and term loan of ...
Chhedi Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5667 of 2013 Chhedi Sahu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Pawan Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate -------- 7/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution, as also learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 420, 406 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No. 77 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4259 of 2012. The FIR shows that the case relates to embezzlement of Government money. The FIR was registered by Block Development Officer, Chanho, in the district of Ranchi, wherein, so far as this petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that N.G.O. which was being run by the petitioner, was e...
M/S.Tata Engineering and Locomat Vs. Presiding Officer,labour Court
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 4739 of 2001 M/s TATA Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited, Telco, Jamshedpur ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jamshedpur 2. D.K. Mishra ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijoy Pratap Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.-II Mr. Rajesh Shankar I.A. No. 45 o8. 29.08.2013 This I.A. has been filed for modification of order dated 26.09.2001, whereby the award dated 31st of March 2001 passed by the Labour Court, Jamshedpur in Reference Case No. 10 of 1989 had been stayed, subject to the condition under Section 17 (B) of the Industrial Dispute Act. It is submitted that last pay drawn by the respondent No. 2, the workman was Rs. 991/-, which he is getting, as per aforesaid order. It is submitted that taking into account the present economic condition of the country, it is not possible for the res...
Ashok Hansda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(D.B.)No.1064of2008 AshokHansda .... .... ....Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEP.P.BHATT FortheAppellant :Mr.DhananjayKumarDubey,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mr.RaviPrakash,A.P.P. I.A.No.6337of2013 05/29.08.2013 Inthisinterlocutoryapplication,thesoleappellant namelyAshokHansdahasprayedforhisreleaseonbailduring pendencyofthisappeal. Learned counsel submitted that though his same prayer was earlier rejected, the coconvict namely Mahadeo MurmuhasbeengrantedbailbythisCourtinCr.Appeal(D.B.) No.1053of2008. Thechargeagainstthisappellantandthe materialonrecordisexactlyidentical.Theappellantandother four persons were made accused in the case on the same allegation, but one of the coaccused namely Pramod Hansd whowasseparatelytried,hasbeenacquitted.Theappellantis incustodyforabouteightyearsandthereisnolikelihoodof appealbeingtakenupforhearinginnearfuture. Learned A.P....
Arbind Hansda ? Arbind Kumar Hansda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1567 of 2011 Arbind Hansda @ Arbind Kumar Hansda ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /29.08.2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file a proper application before appropriate forum. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Mantosh Kumar Ojha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(Cr.)No.317of2011 MantoshKumarOjha .... .... ....Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEP.P.BHATT ForthePetitioner :Mr.P.P.N.Roy,Sr.Advocate FortheState :Mr.AjitKumar,A.A.G. Ms.SwetaRani,J.C.toA.A.G. 15/29.08.2013 AnaffidavitswornbytheSuperintendentofPolice, hasbeenfiledintheCourttoday.Onperusaloftheaffidavit,we findthattheassurancehasbeengivenbytherespondentsto expedite the investigation and recover the victim girl at the earliest. Theaffidavitalsorevealsthatimmediatestepshave been taken by the district police after the order dated 13.8.2013,suchasconstitutingspecialteamforsearchofthe girlandchangingtheinvestigatingofficer. Aprayerhasbeen madeseekingtwomonths'timetocompletetheprocessandfile affidavit. Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that prayer was earlier made for handingovertheinvestigationtotheC.B.I.;asthepetitioner...
Suresh Oraon Vs. the Union of India and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(P.I.L.)No.3197of2012 SureshOraon ... ... ... Petitioner Versus UnionofIndia&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.AnupKumarAgrawal,Advocate FortheC.C.L. :Mr.AnoopKumarMehta,Advocate FortheRespondentNo.5 :Mr.RahulSaboo,Advocate ForthePunjabStatePowerCorporation :Mr.M.S.Mittal,Sr.Advocate :Mrs.ShilpiJohn,Advocate ForM/s.MonetDanielWashery :Mr.IndrajeetSinha,Advocate 13/29.08.2013 Mr.B.R.Reddy,GeneralManagerofNorthKarnpuraAreaof M/s.C.C.L.ispresentintheCourtandadmitsthatacauseway usingcoaldusthasbeenconstructedacrosstheDamodarriverby the C.C.L. near Purnadih Open Cast Project of the M/s. C.C.L. Photographsenclosedwiththe2ndsupplementarycounteraffidavit dated 27.08.2013 on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 clearly depict how the heap of coal dust has been used for making an illegaltemporarybridgeacrosstheDamodarriverandhowthecoal particles in huge quantity are ...
Yadunanth Singh ? Tunnu Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.692 of 2009 Yadunath Singh @ Tunnu Singh..........Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .................................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Altaf Hussain For the State : A.P.P 5.27.8.13. In terms of the provision as contained in Chapter XXI-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the case has already been disposed of and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Bhola Nath Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1142 of 2013 Bhola Nath Mishra .......................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .......................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.A.K.Das For the State : A.P.P 4.27.8.13. In view of the office note relating to non-service of notice, let fresh step be taken for service of notice upon opposite party no.2 through ordinary process, for which talbana etc. must be filed by 30.8.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioner in Bahargora (Gurabanda) P.S. Case no.16 of 2009 (G.R.No.65 of 2009), pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Ghatshila. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »