Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Sidho Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI B. A. No. 6376 of 2013 Sidho Ram ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. ........ 3/31.08.2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1415 of 2013 Raj Kumar ...... ... ... ... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and another ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Roy For the State : Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Nilesh Kumar ........ 6/31.08.2013 Put up this case after one week, as prayed by the petitioner. In the meantime, interim order passed on 07.05.2013 will continue. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Tag this Judgment!Sapan Ghose Alias Tarkeshwar Ghose Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6133 of 2013 Sapan Ghose @ Tarkeshwar Ghose ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Pandey For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/31.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 366A of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Arki P.S. Case No.07 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.52 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that there is direct allegation against the petitioner to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant aged about 13 years. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity and the informant and the petitioner are neighbours. It has also been submitted that even the statement of the victim girl has not been recorded in this case, even though the victim has been re...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Ashish Tiwari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1438 of 2013 Ram Ashish Tiwari ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rajendra Chaturvedi ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : M/s B.M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate Satish Kumar Keshri For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel ........ 8/31.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Ram Ashish Tiwari is moved by Sri B.M. Tripathy, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Additional PP. for the State and Sri Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel for the informant/opposite party No.2. It appears that informant had entered into an agreement with petitioner for sale of land pertaining to Khata No. 41, plot Nos. 589 and 647, area 1.02 acres. It further appears that informant again by Annexure-11 executed power of attorney in favour of petitioner for empowering him to sale 57 decimals...
Tag this Judgment!Santosh Kumar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6665 of 2013 Santosh Kumar Mahto .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ....... ... Opposite PartY Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Nivedita Kundu For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.8.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. It reveals from written report that on 17.9.2012, the informant was working as a labourer where the petitioner was supervisor. He entered into her room and committed rape on the informant on the point of knife. He had also taken nude photograph of the informant in his mobile phone and later, started black mailing her. He was also giving threat by saying that he is a member of MCC and if the informant will open her mouth, she would be killed. Lastly, on 21.10.2012, the matter was informed by the informant to her husband and thereafter this case has been lodged. It is submitted that due to monetary dispute, the informant has lo...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Kumar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6458 of 2013 Rajeev Kumar Mahto ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : M/s S.P. Roy, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 470, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the prosecution that at the instance of the Managing Director of Alliance Properties Stock India Limited, the informant collected money from the villagers for its investment in the company so that they may get benefit out of it. After collecting money, the informant as well as his wife deposited it with the company. Subsequently, when they did find that the objective of the company is being not fulfilled, the informant asked the...
Tag this Judgment!Raju Dehati Alias Raju Jawed Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6358 of 2013 Raju Dehati @ Raju Jawed Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/31.08.2013: The petitioner is an accused in the case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; there is no specific allegation of any overt act; he is in custody since June, 2012; nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. Learned A.P.P. opposed the petitioner's prayer and submitted that he is a named accused in the F.I.R. and he had given pistol to Sonu and exhorted him to kill the deceased; Sonu, thereafter, fired at the deceased which caused his death. Regard being had to the nature of allegation and the m...
Tag this Judgment!Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.5497of2011 Courtonitsownmotion .... .... ....Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEP.P.BHATT ForthePetitioner :M/sDelipJerath(AmicusCuriae), RajeshKumar,V.V.Pradhan,AmitKumar Mishra,Advocates FortheState :AdvocateGeneral FortheCorporation :Mr.L.C.N.Sahdeo,Advocate 19/31.08.2013 The affidavits have been filed by the District administrationandbytheMunicipalCorporation. Though,itappearsthattheyhavestartedthinkingin termsofthedirectionsofthisCourt,noconcreteremedialstep hasbeentakensofartoovercometheproblem. LearnedAdvocateGeneralandlearnedcounselfor RanchiMunicipalCorporation,however,assuredtheCourtthat theyshallevolveeffectivesystemandcomeoutwithconcrete remedial measures to prevent eveteasing and crime against womeningeneralandgirlsinparticularbythenextdate. Forthatpurpose,theyprayedforsixweeks'time. In view of the said assurance, six weeks' time, as prayed...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Chamaria Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.2712 of 2012 Sanjay Chamria . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. I. Sinha, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 02/31.07.2013: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. Entire criminal proceeding of C/1 Case No.605 of 2011 including order dated 01.06.2011, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, under which cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner, is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the parties have settled their monetary dispute and, thereby, they have entered into a compromise. Case of the prosecution is that the Opp. Party No.2 having been financed by Magma Fincorp Ltd., purchased a vehicle bearing registration not JH-05E-3221. Thereafter, the complainant regul...
Tag this Judgment!Sarju Prasad Mehta Vs. the State of Jharkand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4497 of 2012 Lakshman Ram .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4314 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Mehta .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4340 of 2012 Gyani Yadav .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4344 of 2012 Raj Kumar Ram .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4345 of 2012 Imtiyaz Ahmad .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4349 of 2012 Ram Krishna Pandey .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4350 of 2012 Md. Mojammil .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4353 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »