Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nidhi Kumari Soni Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.974 of 2010 Nidhi Kumari Soni ........................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others ............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. K.P.Deo For the State :A.P.P 6.25.07.13 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Bajrangi Lal Patwa Alias Bajrangi Lal Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6808 of 2013 Bajrangi Lal @ Patwa @ Bajrangi Lal Gupta ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kumar For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/25.7.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 272/273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 47(A) of the Excise Act, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.105 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.613 of 2013. The case relates to recovery of foreign liquor form the house of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Bajrangi Lal @ Patwa @ Bajrangi Lal Gupta is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judi...
Fulendra Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 993 of 2013 Fulendra Sao .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. S.S. Prasad For the State: Mr. P.K. Jaiswal , APP 6/25.07.2013: It is submitted by learned Additional P.P. that he will file counter affidavit today. Under the said circumstance, let this case be listed along with counter affidavit on 30.07.2013. In the meantime, interim order dated 24.06.2013 will continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Madhav Lal Bhargav Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 1344 of 2013 Madhav Lal Bhargav ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. R.M. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. ---- 04/25-07-2013 Learned J.C. to A.G. prays for time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit and reply to I.A. Prayer is allowed. It is made clear that if counter affidavit and reply to the I.A. is not filed, the writ petition and I.A shall be disposed of on its own merit on the next date. As prayed for, put up this case on 5th August, 2013. Till then, the interim order dated 9.5.2013 shall continue. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Maksood Alam and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1865 of 2013. ----- 1. Maksood Alam 2. Arif Ansari 3. Sonu Ali @ Sonu @ Javed Akhtar Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri Afaque Ahmed For the State : Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 04/25.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Maksood Alam,Arif Ansari and Sonu Ali @ Sonu @ Javed Akhtar is moved by Sri Afaque Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, Addl.P.P. for the State. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the informant and his sister with lathi. But from perusal of injury report of Sakila Khatun (sister of informant), it appears that that she received only one injury, caused by sharp cutting weapon Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 0...
Talha Sakib Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 631 of 2013 ------- Talha Sakib . Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sahin Kahakasa ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : : M/s. Satish Kumar Keshri For the Opposite Parties : : M/s. A.P.P. ------- 02/ 25.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.06.2013, passed by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, in S.T. No. 20 of 2013, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for discharge has been rejected by the Court below.3. The petitioner has been made accused in Katkamsandi (Pelawal) P.S. Case No. 45 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 727 of 2012, for the offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have sexually exploited the informant on the false pretext of marrying her.4. The case was in...
Murari Prasad Bhadani Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1669 of 2013 Murari Prasad Bhadani Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the State : - Mr. G.S. Prasad, A.P.P. 04/25.07.2013 Put up this case on 30.07.2013, as prayed by learned Additional P.P. In the meantime, interim order passed on 13.05.2013 will continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Tarkeshwar Goswami Alias Nayan Goswami Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1641 of 2013 Tarkeshwar Goswami @ Nayan Goswami ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate For the State : - Mr. A.K. Prasad, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, Advocate. 03/25.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Tarkeshwar Goswami @ Nayan Goswami, is moved by Sri K.S. Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri A.K. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Kalyan Banerjee, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. At the outset, Sri K.S. Nanda submits that petitioner is ready to keep opposite party no. 2 as his wife with all love and dignity and he is also ready to give written undertaking that he will not torture her in future. Sri Kalyan Banerjee, submits that his client is also ready to reside with petitioner provided that he will give an under...
Manoj Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.(C)CaseNo.586of2011 ManojRamVs.TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:None FortheRespondents:JCtoAG Dated25 th July,2013 Nobodyappearsonbehalfofthepetitionerregularly.Today also no body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this petitionisdismissedfornonprosecution. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) dey...
Madan Sao Alias Madan Prasad and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6792 o1. Madan Sao @ Madan Prasad 2. Sarwan Singh 3. Samsher Khan 4. Nejar Khan ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhay Kumar Chaturvedy For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/25.7.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4(1) of the Minor and Minerals Act, Section 48, 53, 54 of Jharkhand Mines Act and Section 14 of the Pollution Act, in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.11 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.32 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioners are alleged to be involved in illegal mining of coal. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners Madan Sao @ Madan Prasad, Sarwan Singh, Samsher Khan and Nejar K...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »