Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subash Kumar Mittal Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P(PIL) No. 1545 of 2013 ---- Subash Kumar Mittal . Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. .. Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. A.K.Rashidi. For the Respondents : G.A. ----- Order No. 02 Dated :26. h July 2013 The grievance of the petitioner is that officers of the Government are not maintaining the log book of the vehicles properly. The petitioner may represent before the concerned department of the Government who may look into the matter. With this observation this writ petition is disposed of. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) ( Jaya Roy, J.) Biswas/SI...
Bablu Marandi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 505 o1. Bablu Marandi 2. Dhano Marandi 3. Bablu Marandi-II 4.Arjun Marandi 5. Kalicharan Hembram 6. Lalu Soren 7. Chunilal Marandi 8. Hopna Marandi 9. Surju Marandi @ Sarju Marandi 10. Dhani Ram Marandi 11. Kaila Pujhar 12. Paltan Pujhar 13. Bishwanath Pujhar 14. Tumba Hembram 15. Debilal Marandi ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another ..... Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ I. A. No. 4698 o5. 26.07.2013 This interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 183 days in filing the criminal revision application. In view of the statements made in the interlocutory application, the delay in filing the criminal revision application is condoned. The aforesaid interlocutory application, thus, stands allowed. Cr. Revision No. 505 of 2013 This application will be heard. Admit. C...
Munna Lal Kabaria Vs. Bibi Gariban Khatoon
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.R. No. 29 of 2012 Munna Lal Kabaria .... .. Petitioner Versus Bibi Gariban Khatoon ...... Respondent --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Tripurari Prasad, Adv. For the respondent : - -- 6/26.07.2013 I.A. No.2754 of 2012 The present application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of about 216 days in filing of the revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the application and more particularly the reason stated in paragraph 5 of the application, sufficient cause has been made out which prevented the petitioner to prefer revision application in time. Hence, delay in filing of revision is ordered to be condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No.2754 of 2012 stands allowed. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
Neha Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Om Prakash Singh Vs. Central C ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No.2130 of 2013 Neha Enterprises .... Petitioner Versus Central Coal Fields Limited & others. .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr.Sumeet Gadodia For the Respondents : Mr.A.K.Das 02/26.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. The simple grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that in the matter of awarding of tender for transportation of M.I.O powder under U.C.I.L., Jadugora to Gidi Washery in respect of Aragada Area there has been certain illegality in respect of which he has made representation before the respondent No.1, Chairman cum Managing Director, Central Coalfields Limited, which has not been looked into. Petitioner claims to be the participant in the first as well as second tender for allotment of the said work. However, first tender was cancelled and certain terms in the first tender was varied in the second tender in which another person was allotted the wo...
Hasman Sai Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 148 of 1998 (R) ------- 1. Hasman Sai 2. Radhe Shyam Singh . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : : M/s. D.K.Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : : M/s. A.P.P. ------- 11/ 26.07.2013 This case has a chequered history. This revision application was admitted by order dated 7.9.1998 and the petitioners were directed to be released on bail, but subsequently due to non-compliance of the order dated 18.1.1999 this case stood dismissed and the Lower Court Records were accordingly, sent back, but the case was restored to its original file by order dated 13.03.2013 passed in Cr.M.P. No. 2432 of 2012.2. This application is directed against the Judgment dated 9.6.1998 passed by the learned VIIIth A.J.C., Ranchi, in Cr. Appeal No.62 of 1998, dismissing the appeal filed against the Judgment and Order passed by Sri V. Prasad, lea...
Mahesh Minz and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1519 of 2009 Mahesh Minz and others........................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another...Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr. Rajesh kumar For the State : A..P.P 11.25.07.13 As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 1.8.2013 along with Cr.M.P.Nos.627 of 2013 and 1078 of2013. Till then, interim order passed on 28.1.2013 shall continue. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Chukender Mahto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 635 o1. Chukender Mahto 2. Naresh Mahto @ Naresh Kumar ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 25.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 17.6.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, in Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2013, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Hazaribag, in G.R. No. 244 of 2013, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile petitioners, has been dismissed by the learned Appellate Court below. The petitioners have been made accused in Mandu P.S. Case No. 21 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 244 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...
Kishun Sharma Vs. Ram Preet Mahato and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. W.P(C) No.1044 of 2013 Kishun Sharma ........................ Petitioner Versus Ram Preet Mahato &Ors .................. Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner :- Mr Bhaiya V. Kumar Adv. For the Respondents :- Mrs.Vandana Singh Adv. 8/25.7.2013. The present petitioner by way of filing this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing the order dated 21.12.2012 passed by the learned Sub-Judge 1st Court-cum- A.C.J.M. Bokaro in Execution Case No. 20 of 2004 whereby the learned court below has rejected the objection filed by the Judgment Debtor/Petitioner under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents at length. Perused the impugned order and other materials placed on record. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in support of his submission has referred to and relief upon ...
Madhu Gope Alias Halida Gop Alias Dubraj Gop Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.4588of2013 in CriminalAppeal(DB)No.474of2013 MadhuGope@HalidaGop@DubrajGop Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant :Mr.LukeshKumar,Advocate FortheRespondent :A.P.P. th 3/Dated:25 July2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.I. A.No.4588of2013: ThisapplicationhasbeenpreferredunderSection5ofthe LimitationActforcondonationofdelayof1266daysinpreferring thiscriminalappeal. Having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and lookingtothefactsandreasonsstatedinthisI.A.especially,in paragraph nos. 5, 6 & 7, there are reasonable reasons for condonationofdelay. We,therefore,condonethedelayinpreferringthecriminal appeal. I.A.No.4588of2013is,therefore,allowedanddisposedof. Cr.Appeal(DB)No.474of2013: Registryisdirectedtoenlistthiscriminalappealontheboard ofAdmissionon30thJuly,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.Shekhar/AmitCp3...
Mahali Oraon and ors Vs. Revenue Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.7625of2012 MahaliOraon&Ors. .Petitioners. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioners : Mr.AtanuBanerjee,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toS.C.(Mines) 05/25.07.2013: LearnedJ.C.toS.C.(Mines)submittedthatthepetitioner hasbeengivenonepromotionandforthatreasonhehasnot been given the benefit of first ACP. However, the order of promotioncouldnotbebroughtonrecord.Forthatpurpose,he praysfortwoweeks'time. Prayerisallowed. Putupthiscaseon20thAugust,2013. Till then, interim order dated 20th March, 2013 shall continue. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »