Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Achha Oraon Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.489of2009 AchhaOraon . Petitioner Versus UnionofIndiaandothers .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.P.Gangopadhyay,Advocate FortheRespondents :J.C.toS.C.I Mr.RamNivasRoy,Advocate 13/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Beforelearnedcounselforthepetitionerarguedoutthecaseindetail,it is fairly submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that in due compliance of the order passed by this Court dated 19th January, 2009 in W.P.(S) No. 94 of 2009, the respondents have passed the order dated 6thNovember,2009whichisatAnnexureBtothecounteraffidavit.2. In view of this submission and looking to the order passed by the respondentsdated6th November,2009(AnnexureBtothecounteraffidavit), there is no willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, by the respondents. Hence, this contempt application is, hereby, dismissed. The petitionerisatlibertytochallengetheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated 6thNovember,2009,inacc...
Saras Nath Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- C.M.P. No. 413 of 2011 With I.A.NO.3715/2011 ---- Saras Nath Singh & Ors. . Petitioners. Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. .. Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Rohit Roy. For the Respondents : J.C. to G.A.. ----- Order No. 09 Dated :26. h July 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties on the point of limitation. Accordingly, the delay in filing the C.M.P. is condoned and I.A.NO.3715/2011 stands disposed of. Though this is an application for setting aside of abatement of L.P.A.NO.15/2010, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in a mutation proceeding, that matter came before the learned Single Judge and the learned Single Judge made certain observation like mutation entries are correct. It is submitted that mutation proceedings are fiscal proceedings and the aggrieved party has a right to file a suit of declaration etc. wherein the rights of the part...
Subhash Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of Investigatio
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.413 of 2011 Subhash Chandra ........................... Petitioner VERSUS C.B.I through S.P, Dhanbad..........Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.M.B.Lal For the C.B.I. : Mr.M.Khan 5/ 26.07.13. Learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I submits that the matter be posted on 16.8.2013 so that counter affidavit be filed. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 16.8.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 12.7.2013 shall continue. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Noro Purty Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5674 of 2013 Noro Purty .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha (4) For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 26.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Majhgaon case No. 24 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from fard beyan that two daughters of the informant were quarrelling with each other. In the meantime, petitioner appeared and caused assault to Kamla Pingua, one of the daughter of the informant. It is disclosed that Kamla Pingua felt humiliated and went towards river side and said that she does not want to be alive and thereafter she was found dead. It is submitted that no case under section 302 IPC is made out. Cause of death is still unknown awaiting viscera report. Learned counse...
Suresh Prasad Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 990 of 2010 Suresh Prasad Verma ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. I.A. No. 4080 o07. 26.07.2013 After some argument learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this interlocutory application, as the appellant has not yet completed half of the sentence awarded to him. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the I.A. No. 4080 of 2013 is dismissed as withdrawn. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ms Maiher Steel Pvt Ltd
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- C.M.P. No. 360 of 2012 ---- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur at Singhbhum East ... Petitioner. Versus M/s. Maiher Steel (P) Ltd. ... ... Respondent. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Deepak Roshan, Advocate. For the Respondents : ----- ----- Order No. 04 Dated :26. h July 2013 Delay in filing this restoration petition is condoned in view of the fact that the Tax Appeal no.06/2007 was dismissed without notice to the parties and there is no need to issue notice to the respondents on the application for condonation of delay. In view the reasons given in the order dated 19th September, 2012 passed in C.M.P.NO.452/2011(The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna Vrs. Jai Prakash Singhania) and in view of the similar facts involved in the dismissal of T.A.NO.06/2007, this C.M.P is allowed and T.A.NO.06/2007 is restored to its original number. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) ( Ja...
Kesab Rajak and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2009 DilipKumarMishraandothers . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers .... OppositeParties With Cont.Case(Civil)No.615of2009 KeshabRajakandothers . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :None FortheState :J.C.toSr.S.C.I FortheUniversity :Mr.M.S.Anwar,Sr.Advocate 14/Dated:26 th July,2013 Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2009 1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.2. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Universityarepresent.3. LearnedcounselfortheStatesubmittedthatlettheamountbefirstly paidbytherespondentUniversitytothepetitionersand,thereafter,thesaid amount will be reimbursed by the respondentState within a period of six weeks.4. Asnobodyappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners,thismatterisadjourned. ThismatterwillbeheardalongwithCont.Case(Civil)No.615of2009.5. The matters are adjourned ...
Sk.AmIn and ors Vs. Gahru Khatoon and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 205 of 2012 Sk. Amin & Others ..Petitioners Versus Gahru Khatoon & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate ---- 03/26-07-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition in order to file appropriate application. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This C.M.P. is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
N.K.Srivastava Vs. Chairman,coal India Ltd. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
1 W.P.(S).No.4903of2003 [InthematterofanapplicationunderArticle226oftheConstitutionofIndia] ........... N.K.Srivastava ...Petitioner Versus 1.Chairman,CoalIndiaLtd.,Calcutta 2.ChairmancumManagingDirector,BCCL,Dhanbad 3.ChairmancumManagingDirector,Western CoalFieldsLtd.,Nagpur ...Respondents ............ ForthePetitioner : Mr.P.P.N.Roy,Sr.Advocate Ms.PragatiPrasad,Advocate FortheRespondents: M/s.AnoopKr.Mehta,ArnimaSinha,Adv. ............ PRESENT HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ............. ByCourt The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order dated 05.09.2003 passed by the ChairmancumManaging Director,whoisthedisciplinaryauthority.2. The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner was appointedas an Executive Engineer(Civil) in the year1977. A Charge Memo was issued to the petitioner on 18.01.2002. The ArticlesofChargesareextractedbelow: ARTICLEI Alleged that Shri N.K. Shrivastava in his capacityasChiefEngineer(Civil)/StaffOfficer(Civil) of Wani North Area, ...
Akhileshwar Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.5295of2013 In Cont.Case(Civil)No.598of2012 AkhileshwarPrasadSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.R.P.Srivastav,Advocate FortheRespondents:J.C.toA.A.G. 10/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. The present petition has been preferred for joining 'Accountant GeneralOfficeofStateofJharkhand'asoppositepartyno.6.2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothereasons stated in this Interlocutory Application and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Interlocutory Application is allowed. Petitionerispermittedtojointheaforesaidpartyasoppositepartyno.6.3. NecessaryamendmentshallbecarriedoutbyredinkinContempt Case(Civil)No.598of2012.4. Noticetothenewlyjoinedoppositepartyno.6.5. Thematterisadjournedon23rdAugust,2013. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »