Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahendra Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 522 of 2013 ------- Mahendra Murmu . Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Parwati Kumari Kisku ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : : M/s. Yogesh Modi For the Opposite Parties : : M/s. A.P.P. ------- 04/ 26.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.05.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Deoghar, in Criminal Revision No. 34 of 2006, whereby in a revision filed by the complainant before the Court below, the Court below has set aside the order dated 31.1.2006 passed by Sri S. K. Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur, whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, had not taken cognizance against the accused for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, but had only found prima- facie case for the offence under Section 417 of the Indian Pena...
Rakesh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1485 of 2012 Rakesh Kumar ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Sunita Prasad ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. S.K. Burnwal, Advocate 13/26.07.2013 Learned counsel for the both the parties have prayed for some time as they have submitted that there is a chance of settlement. Put up this case on 20.08.2013 under same heading. Till then, interim order dated 29.11.2012 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
Anirudh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.652of2009 AnirudhSingh . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.RameshChandraKhatri,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.IV 25/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. LearnedcounselfortheStatesubmittedthatdetailedcounteraffidavit dated25th July,2013hasbeenfiledandasperAnnexureF,thepetitioneris entitledtoRs.7,31,996/.ThiscalculationissenttotheSecretaryoftheRoad ConstructionDepartmentforapprovalandgrantoftheamountand,therefore, heisseekingtimetofilefurtheraffidavitwhetherthisamountissanctionedby the Secretary of the concerned department or not and what amount the respondentStateisgoingtomakepaymenttothepetitioner.Moreover,itis alsosubmittedbylearnedcounselfortheStatethatthereistypographicalerror in AnnexureH that the petitioner has already been retired, but, in fact the petitionerisservingandhisserviceperiodisgoingtobecontinuedforlonger time.Thisletterwillalsobereplacedbyan...
Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1908 of 2013 Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh...... ........ Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance.....Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.Anil Kumar For the Vigilance:Mr.Shailesh 3/ 26.07.13. The document which has been sought to be adduced in evidence under Section 294 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or alternatively by recalling the witness under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not appear in the facts and circumstances tobe necessary for just decision of the case. In such situation, I do not find any illegality with the order dated 27.6.2013 passed in Special Case No.12 of 2001 (Vigilance P.S. Case No.08 of 2001). Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Jhalia Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1753 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1754 o1. Jhalia Devi 2. Mandodari Devi .........Petitioners(in ABA 1753/13) Munna Prasad .....Petitioner ( in ABA 1754/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijyant Verma For the State: Mrs. Niki Sinha ,APP (in ABA No. 1753/13) Ms. Anita Sinha, APP (in ABA 1754/13) 3/26.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw both these anticipatory bail applications. Permission accorded. Accordingly, both these anticipatory bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Zohra Khatoon Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board Through Its Director T ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 184 of 2013 Zohra Khatoon ...... Petitioner Versus Bihar State Electricity Board & anr. ...... Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL -------- For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Advocate For State of Jharkhand: J.C. to S.C.-I For the B.S.E.B.: Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate -------- th Order No. 06: Dated 26 July, 2013 Per D.N.Patel, J.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has to receive Rs.34,519.95 (rupees thirty four thousand five hundred nineteen and ninety five paise only) from respondent no.1 i.e. Bihar State Electricity Board.2. Learned counsel for Bihar State Electricity Board has brought a draft of Canera Bank dated 4th July, 2013, which is being tendered to the learned counsel for the petitioner for onward transmission.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is accepting this draft of Rs.34,519.95 paise on behalf of the petitioner and is giving acknowledgment wit...
Sanjay Chhawcharia Vs. Smt. Sabitri Devi Khowala and an
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 49 of 2011 Sanjay Chhawcharia .... .. Appellant Versus Smt. Sabitri Devi Khowala & Anr. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. Kailesh Prasad Deo, Adv. For the respondent No.2 : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Adv. - -- 5/26.07.2013 I.A. No.3227 of 2012 The present application is filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for substitution of legal heirs of respondent No.1 namely Smt. Sabitri Devi Khowala, who died on 19.8.2012 leaving behind legal heirs which is stated in paragraph 1 of the application. Present application is supported by an affidavit. For the reasons stated, the prayer is allowed. The legal heirs of respondent No.1 are ordered to be substituted as party respondent. One of the legal heir Dinesh Khowala i.e on record as respondent No.2. Therefore, necessary amendment be carried out in the cause title of appeal, accordingly. Let notice be issued upon substituted legal hei...
Siya Sharan Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 612 of 2012 Siya Sharan Prasad .... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : M/s Md. Shamim Akhtar, D.K. Dubey, Adv. - -- 6/26.07.2013 From the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the Secretary of the Managing Committee, GEL Middle School, Umbulbaha, Arki, District Khunti, it appears that the calculation of the salary of the petitioner from April, 2006 till his retirement has been forwarded to the District Superintendent of Education, Khunti for its approval. Copy of the letter addressed to the District Superintendent of Education, Khunti written by Secretary of the School is also produced vide Annexure-C to the supplementary show cause along with calculation chart, which is signed by Principal and Secretary of the GEL Middle School, Umbulbaha. It appears that the said letter has ...
Umran Ahmad Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.604of2009 UmranAhmadKhan . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.P.Roy,Advocate Mr.RanjitKumar,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.I 16/Dated:26 th July,2013 Havingheardlearnedcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheorder passedbythisCourtdated4th March,2009inW.P.(S)No.5016of2008and alsolookingtotheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated16th January,2010 (AnnexureB)aswellaslookingtotheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated 27th July, 2012 (AnnexureC) which are annexed with the supplementary counteraffidavitfiledbytherespondents,thereisnowillfuldisobedienceof theorderpassedbythisCourtbytherespondentStateauthorities.Hence,this contemptapplicationis,hereby,dismissed,reservinglibertywiththepetitioner to challenge the two orders, which are at AnnexuresB and C to the supplementarycounteraffidavitfiledbytherespondents,inaccordancewith lawandbeforeappropriateforum. (D.N.Patel,J.) ...
Narayan Giri Vs. Chairman, Damodar Valley Corpo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.P .No.371of2011 In W.P.(S)No.4328of2005 NarayanGiri Petitioner Versus Chairman,DamodarValleyCorporation&others.........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.SudhakarPandey,Advocate FortheRespondents:Mr.S.Choudhary,Advocate 08/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. ThepresentpetitionhasbeenpreferredforrestorationofW.P.(S)No. 4328of2005,whichwasdismissedfordefaultforwantofappearanceof theAdvocatevideorderdated8thNovember,2011.2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothereasons statedinthispetition,especiallylookingtoparagraphno.4,Ihereby allow this petition by recalling the order dated 8 th November, 2011 passedinW.P.(S)No.4328of2005.W.P.(S)No.4328of2005isrestored toitsoriginalfilewiththesamenumber.3. Thispetitionisallowedanddisposedof.4. Registry is directed to enlist W.P.(S) No. 4328 of 2005 on 26 th August,2013beforeappropriateCourtasperroster. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »