Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Prasad Agrawal and ors Vs. Hari Prasad Agrawal and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6541 of 2007 Vijay Prasad Agrawal & others ....Petitioners Versus Hari Prasad Agrawal & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. V. Shivnath, Sr. Advocate M/s. Manoj Kumar & Birendra Kr., Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. V.S. Prasad, Advocate /26.7.2013: Petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/ direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 23.8.2007 (Annexure-6) passed by the learned Sub-Judge II, Palamau at Daltonganj in Title Suit No. 3 of 1994, whereby the learned court-below expunged the deposition of DW-10, who was defendant No.5 at the final stage of argument. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and perused the impugned order as well as...
Dilip Kumar Mishra and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2009 DilipKumarMishraandothers . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers .... OppositeParties With Cont.Case(Civil)No.615of2009 KeshabRajakandothers . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :None FortheState :J.C.toSr.S.C.I FortheUniversity :Mr.M.S.Anwar,Sr.Advocate 14/Dated:26 th July,2013 Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2009 1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.2. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Universityarepresent.3. LearnedcounselfortheStatesubmittedthatlettheamountbefirstly paidbytherespondentUniversitytothepetitionersand,thereafter,thesaid amount will be reimbursed by the respondentState within a period of six weeks.4. Asnobodyappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners,thismatterisadjourned. ThismatterwillbeheardalongwithCont.Case(Civil)No.615of2009.5. The matters are adjourned ...
Ms Central Coalfields Limited Through Its Senior Manager Finance Sri P ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 1293 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 1488 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 1491 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 1492 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 1497 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 1900 of 2013 M/s Central Coalfields Limited ...... Petitioners(in all cases) Vrs. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) Ranchi ...... Respondent(In all cases) ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr. S.C.(Revenue) Order No.06 Dated 26th July, 2013. At the request of the learned counsel for the respondent, put up this matter after two weeks. Till then, interim order to continue. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir...
M/S Sharda Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.Executi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ArbitrationAppealNo.3of2011 M/sShardaConstruction . Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheExecutiveEngineer, NationalHighwayDivision,Gumla .... Respondent With ArbitrationAppealNo.10of2010 TheStateofJharkhand&another . Appellants Versus M/sShardaConstruction .... Respondent With C.M.P.No.232of2013 TheStateofJharkhand&another . Petitioners Versus M/sShardaConstruction .... Respondent With I.A.No.3379of2013 CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL FortheShardaConstruction :Mr.RajKishorePrasad,Advocate FortheState :Mr.SaketUpadhyay,Advocate 06/Dated:26 th July,2013 I.A.No.3379of2013 1. This interlocutory application has been preferred for condonation of delayof335daysinfilingtherestorationapplication.2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasonsstatedinparagraphnos.4,5and6,therearereasonablereasonsfor condonationofdelayand,hence,thedelayis,hereby,condoned.3. Accordingly,I.A.No.3379of2013isallowedanddisposedof. C.M.P.No.232o...
Kali Munda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(D.B.)No.490of2010 KaliMunda .... .... ....Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :MissAmritaBanerjee,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 05/26.07.2013 I.A.No.1588of2013 Inthisinterlocutoryapplication,appellantnamely, Kali Munda has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that though the appellant's same prayer was earlier rejected,hehasremainedincustodyforabouteightyears;thereis nolikelihoodoftheappealbeingtakenupforhearinginnearfuture; inviewofthelongcustodyhedeservestobereleasedonbailduring pendencyoftheappeal. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellantbuthasnotdisputedthesaidperiodofcustody. Regardbeinghadtothelongperiodofcustodyofthe appellantnamelyKaliMunda, is directed to be released on bail, during pendency of the appeal, on furnish...
Budhu Tudu Alias Badai Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5677of2013 BudhuTudu@BadaiTudu Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.M.Shahzad,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/26.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithChirkunda(Panchet)P.S.Case No.53 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. Case No.912 of 2013, pending in the CourtofSriS.K.Dubey,learnedJudicialMagistrate,1stClass,Dhanbad. Itrevealsfromthe fardbeyan thatsomemiscreants,armedwithpistol, have looted the passersby after blocking the road by putting log. During investigationthepetitionerwasapprehendedwhowasputonT.I.Paradeand identifiedbyoneofthewitnessMithu. It is submitted that petitioner and said witness Mithu are resident of samevillageandtheyarehavingpreviousenmity. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Nodocumenthasbeenfurnishedtoshowthatthepetitionerishaving enmity with said witness Mithu. Since petitioner has been identif...
Shanta Ram Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.425of2013 In Cont.CaseNo.324of2012 ShantaRamMahto Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.M.M.Pan,Advocate FortheRespondents:J.C.toG.A. 10/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. The present petition has been preferred for joining 'Accountant General,StateofJharkhand'asoppositepartyno.5.2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothereasons stated in this Interlocutory Application and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Interlocutory Application is allowed. Petitionerispermittedtojointheaforesaidpartyasoppositepartyno.5.3. Necessaryamendmentshallbecarriedoutbyredinkduringcourse oftheday.4. Noticetothenewlyjoinedoppositepartyno.5.5. Thematterisadjournedon16thAugust,2013. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
Deepak Kumar Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.962 of 2012 Deepak Kumar Jha............................................... Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I and Ors...Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the C.B.I. : Mr.M.Khan 19/ 26.07.13. As prayed for on behalf of the petitioner, let this matter be listed on 16.8.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 29.6..2012 shall continue. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Md Saukat Daud Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 463 of 2013 Md. Saukat Daud ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. J.P. Jha, Sr. Advocate & Aishwarya Prakash, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 26.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 2.3.2013 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 678 of 2008, whereby, the final form submitted by the police has been accepted by the Court below, giving liberty to the complainant-petitioner to proceed with the case on the basis of complaint-cum-protest petition, if so advised. The impugned order shows that a Complaint Case No. 1925 of 2008 was filed by the complainant-petitioner against his wife, his father-in-law and other in-laws for the alleged offences under Sections 363, 379, 367, 368, ...
Jahar Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(C)No.7252of2005 JaharRoy ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.xx FortheRespondents :J.C.toS.C.I 526.7.2013 Nooneappearsonbehalfofthepetitioner. Onthelastoccasionitappearsthatcounselforthepetitioner had informed the Court that the brief has been taken away by his client.However,anadjournmentwassoughttoascertainwhetherthe petitionerisinterestedinpursuingthecaseornot. However, it appears that no one has thereafter entered appearanceonbehalfofthepetitionerandnooneappearedonbehalf ofthepetitionertodaytopressthiscase. Accordingly,thiswritpetitionisdismissedasnotpressed. (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) Pandey...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »