Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sabbir Alam Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr) No. 71 of 2012 Shabbir Alam .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand and others........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishal Kumar Trivedi For the Respondents: Mr. J.C. to S.C.-III 6/26.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this criminal writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Hari Ram Singh Munda Vs. Water Resources Departement
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6652 of 2012 --- Hari Ram Singh Munda & others --- --- ---- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: M/s H.K. Mahato, Ahalya Mahato, Advocates For the State: JC to SC (L&C) --- 05/ 26.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. According to the petitioners, their landed property as well as dwelling houses was acquired by the State in connection with Swarnarekha Multi Purpose Project, Chandil.3. The photocopies of the notices issued under section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the name of the petitioner no. 1 as well as father of the petitioner nos. 2 & 3 are annexed as Annexure-1 series to the writ application. However, according to these petitioners, though they have made application in the prescribed form for issuance of Vikash Pustika under the rehabilitation policy of the State, but the same has not been issued t...
Dr.Trilochan Mahto and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 370 of 2012 Dr. Trilochan Mahto and others Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand and others Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL ------ For the Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia For the Opp. Parties: J.C. to Sr. S.C.I ------ 19/ Dated: July, 26, 20131) Counsel for the applicants (original petitioners) submitted that a detailed rejoinder affidavit has filed by the respondents dated 22nd July, 2013 and in paragraph 12 therein it has been mentioned that sizable amount is yet to be paid under different heads.2) Counsel for the respondents-University is seeking time to file reply to this rejoinder affidavit.3) Time, as prayed for, is granted.4) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 23rd August, 2013. (D. N. Patel, J) Manoj/CP.2...
Ganesh Kumar Singh Vs. Anita Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 5120 of 2012 --- Ganesh Kumar Singh. ..... Petitioner Versus Anita Devi . ...... Respondent --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT For the Petitioners : M/s. N.K. Sahani, Gauri Devi, Adv. For the respondent : - -- Order No.06 Dated 26th July, 2013. Learned counsel, Mr. Amit Prakash submits that he has received instruction to appear on behalf of sole respondent and he will file VAKALATNAMA on his behalf in course of the date. As prayed, post this case after two weeks. In the meantime, counter affidavit, if any, must be filed. Till the next date of listing, ad interim order granted earlier shall continue. Anu /- (P.P. Bhatt, J.)...
Kailash Machhuwa Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1065 of 2012 Kailash Machhuwa ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Archana Devi ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K. Mahto, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : None 14/26.07.2013 Petitioner has filed this Cr.M.P application for modification of the order dated 18.04.2012 passed in A.B.A. No. 4457 of 2011 passed by this Court by which the petitioner has been granted bail in the Complaint Case No. 81 of 2011, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat to the extent that a sum of Rs. 2,000/- (two thousand) which is to be deposited in Account number of the O.P. No.2 for the maintenance of the children from out of their wedlock, permitted him to deposit in the Court below. It is submitted that till the date of filing of this petition the O.P. No.2 did not give her Account No. of any bank to the petitioner. I...
Sharadindu Kundu Vs. Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1294 of 2012 Sharadindu Kundu .......... ........ Petitioner VERSUS Union of India through C.B.I....Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the C.B.I : Mr.M.Khan 6/ 26.07.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was made an accused in R.C.case no.11(A) of 2007(R) in connection of which certain Pass Books, N.S.C and other documents, as per the seizure list dated 7.9.2007 were seized. Subsequently, the petitioner moved an application before the court below for release of those articles but that application was rejected on 22.3.2012 after holding that those materials would be subject matter of the trial. Against that order, a revision was preferred before this Court, vide Cr.Rev.No.189 of 2011 which was also rejected. Thereupon when the charge sheet was subm...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. M/S.Ambika Constructions
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arb. Appeal No.05 of 2004 Steel Authority of India Limited Appellant Versus M/s. Ambika Constructions through Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL ------ For the Appellant: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the Respondent: Mr. Sidhartha J.Roy ------ 19/ Dated: July, 26, 20131) It is submitted by the counsel for both sides that there was some typographical error in the 1st paragraph of the order dated 28th June, 2013. In fact the counsel for the respondent had offered the amount which was equivalent to the principal amount as awarded by the learned Arbitrator to accept the same as full & final settlement towards the dispute and this was to be accepted by the appellant.2) It is submitted by the learned counsel for both sides that as talks of amicable settlement is going on and if at all arrived at, the same will be reduced in writing and will be presented in proper format before this Court on the next date of hearing and therefore, he is ...
Jharkhand State Housing Board Through Its Manager Estate Namely Shri M ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No.1862 of 2013 Jharkhand State Housing Board .... Petitioner Versus Sri Jagdish Prasad Singh .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sachin Kumar For the Respondents :02. 26.07.2013 Issue notice upon the sole respondent under ordinary process on the present and correct address for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which, this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the Execution Case No. 6 of 2012 pending before the District Consumer Forum, Dhanbad. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Deoghar Jamtara Central Co Ope Vs. Mitan Mahto and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilReviewNo.36of2012 DeogharJamtaraCentralCooperativeBankLtd.Vs.MitanMahto&others with I.A.No.4005of2013 In Cont.Case(Civil)No.248of2012 MitanMahtoVs.TheStateofJharkhand&others CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.DurgaCharanMishra,Advocate FortheState:J.C.toG.P.VI FortheBank :Mr.DelipJerath,Advocate FortheBiharState:Mr.S.P .Roy,G.A 13/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Looking to the averments and the allegations levelled in this civil reviewpetitionbythisapplicant,whoisoriginalrespondentno.3inW.P. (S)No.2787of2011,especiallylookingtoparagraphnos.7and8ofthe reviewpetition,thereisnoreplybytherespondentsStateintheircounter affidavit.2. Itherefore,directtheSecretaryoftheCooperativeDepartmentofthe StateofJharkhandtofileaffidavitclearlygivingreplyofparagraphnos.7 and 8 of this civil review petition. This affidavit shall be filed by the concernedSecretaryonorbeforethenextdateofhearing.3. Postthismatteron23rdAugust,2013. I.A.No.4005of2013 1. Thisappl...
indu Shankar Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1741 of 2005 Indu Shankar Prasad ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Shyam Narsaria, JC to SC (L&C) For the Private Respondents: Mr. V. Shivnath, Sr. Advocate /26.7.2013: Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that this matter has been listed time and again; however, learned counsel for the petitioner has remained absent and not proceeded further with the case. On perusal of the order-sheet, it transpires that learned counsel for the petitioner has not remained present since 12th of July, 2011. However, with a view to give an opportunity, the matter was adjourned since last three occasions. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has not remained present. This writ petition is of the year 2005 and therefore, such old matters cannot be allowed to linger indefinitely in abse...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »