Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uma Shankar Mehta Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 186 of 2011 Uma Shankar Mehta ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 26.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this revision application. This criminal revision application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Niranjan Prasad Jaiswal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.871of2012 NiranjanPrasadJaiswal . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.M.K.Habib,Advocate FortheState :Mr.A.Allam,Sr.S.C.II 10/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this petitioner had earlierpreferredW.P.(S)No.3731of2011whichwasdisposedofbythisCourt videorderdated5thSeptember,2011.2. Paragraph5oftheaforesaidorderreadsasunder:5. Legallypayableaccumulatedsubsistenceallowanceshall alsobepaidtothepetitionerwithinaperiodof15daysfrom thedateofreceiptofacopyofthisorderandthereafter,itwill bepaidregularlyeverymonth.3. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that suspension of the present petitioner was revoked on 18 th November, 2011, whereas,therespondentshavepaidsubsistenceallowanceupto6thNovember, 2011and,therefore,thepresentpetitionerisentitledtosubsistenceallowance fortheperiodrunningfrom6thNovember...
Maheshwari Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.424 of 2013 Maheshwari Prasad ........................... Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance...Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the Vigilance: Mr.Shailesh 5/ 26.07.13. I.A.No.5172 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance on the interlocutory application bearing no.5172 of 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier this application had been filed for quashing of the order wherein prayer for discharge has been rejected but while the matter was pending before this Court, even the charges have been framed and therefore, that order by which charges have been framed has been challenged by way of interlocutory application and therefore, prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. The prayer made in the interlocuto...
Krishnadhan Khaware and ors. Vs. Kailash Bihari Thakur and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 207 of 2010 Krishnadhan Khaware & Ors. ..Appellants Versus Kailash Bihari Thakur & Anr. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellants : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.N. Sahay, Sr. Advocate --- I.A. No. 4987 o04. 26-07-2013 In this I.A., the appellants have prayed for return of the original Will dated 1.4.2001 filed by the appellants on 24.02.2010 in lower appellate court. It has been stated that though the said Will was brought on record, it has not been exhibited and has not been referred to anywhere in the judgments of the courts below. The said Will is lying on record. The appellants thus want to get back the said Will, which is unnecessarily lying on the record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not disputed the said contention and has not opposed the application. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to return the ori...
Sharda Devi Vs. Wazir Mahato
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 187 of 2012 Sharda Devi ..Appellant Versus Wazir Mahato .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellant : Mr. Gopi Nath Chandra, Advocate --- I.A. No. 5169 o02. 26-07-2013 In this I.A., the appellant has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of S.A. No. 187 of 2012. It has been submitted that the appellant is a widow and old lady aged about 70 years and she has filed this second appeal aggrieved by erroneous judgments and decrees. Second appeal, thus, deserves early hearing on Admission. Considering that the appellant is an old lady and widow, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list S.A. No. 187 of 2012 under the heading "For Admission" on 23rd August, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Ravi Shankar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7056 of 2013 Ravi Shankar Singh ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/26.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that according to allegation made in the F.I.R. is that 8 grams heroine containing in 16 small packets (puria) have been recovered from the possession of four persons. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 22.11.2012 i.e. more than nine months. It is also submitted that recovery of small quantity of heroine i.e. 5 grams from a person, punishment is only six months and fine of Rs. 10,000/- according to the Section 21a of...
Babli Kumari Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Ltd Represented by Its Chairman ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.L. No.2133 of 2013 Babli Kumari .... Petitioner Versus M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & others . .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 04/26.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. This petitioner has approached this Court for a direction upon the respondent- BCCL to take a decision on her application of compassionate appointment under the respondents. As per the case of the petitioner, her father Late Shiv Shankar Kumar, who was semi skilled worker employed under the respondent- BCCL at Patherdih Coal Washery had died in harness on 15.1.1998. It is the case of the petitioner that her mother had already died on 4.5.1994 and her younger brother also died on 23.3.2000. Petitioner is aged about 33 years and is eligible for appointment. She submitted her application form in January, 2001 in terms of the provision of N.C.W.A. Thereafter, certain defect...
Ms Bina Metal Way Pvt Ltd Vs. the General Manager Engg Northern Railwa ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arb. Appeal No.01 of 2013 M/s. Bina Metal Way Pvt. Ltd., Appellant Versus The General Manager (Engg.) and other Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL ------ For the Appellant: Ms. Warda Khan For the Respondents: ------ 04/ Dated: July, 26, 20131) Learned counsel for the appellant, upon instructions from her client, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.2) Permission, as sought for, is granted.3) This appeal is disposed of, as withdrawn.4) Interim relief, if any granted by this Court, stands vacated. (D. N. Patel, J) Manoj/CP.2...
Umesh Kumar Thakur Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 486 of 2013 ------- Umesh Kumar Thakur . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- I.A. No. 5269 o5. 26.07.2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw I.A. No. 5269 of 2013, with the liberty to file another Interlocutory Application with the vakalatnama of the mother of the juvenile. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the revision application be listed on 01.08.2013, if in the meantime the Interlocutory Application as prayed for, is filed. (H.C.Mishra, J.) D.S....
Hari Narayan Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 489 of 2013 Hari Narayan Prasad ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 26.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this revision application. This criminal revision application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »