Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yatindra Kumar Das and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.)No. 126 of 2010 Yatindra Kumar Das & Anr .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand and others........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. R. Krishna Mr. Amit Sinha Mr. R.R. Tiwari For the Respondents: Mr. R.N. Roy, G.P.-III Mr. Jalisur Rahman,J.C. to G.P.-III For the Informant: Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate 16/26.07.2013: A counter affidavit filed by Senior Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID, namely, Lagnu Hans, wherein at paragraph no. 5(ix) the following statements made:- As per para 87, 89 and 100 of the case Diary apparently the I.O. has made a request for issuance of order for submitting charge sheet and to get sanction of prosecution against the accused person, who are Government Servants. Under the said circumstance, I direct Director General of Police, Jharkhand to look into the matter and ask the appropriate authority for taking decision as to whether charge sheet is required t...
Dhirendra Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.763of2009 DhirendraKumarSinha Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.RajeshKumarMishra,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toSr.S.C.II 13/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to join 'State of Bihar' as oppositepartyno.6.2. Permission,asprayedfor,isgrantedforjoiningtheaforesaidpartyas oppositepartyno.6.3. Necessaryamendmentshallbecarriedoutbyredinkduringcourse oftheday.4. Noticetothenewlyjoinedoppositepartyno.6.5. Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of opposite partyno.6 onthe conditionthatacopyofthiscontemptpetitionwith annexuresaswellasreplyfiledbytheStateofJharkhandwillbesupplied bythecounselfortheapplicant.6. Counsel for the opposite party no. 6 is seeking time to get instructions.7. Postthismatteron23rdAugust,2013. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
Smt Kalyani Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.895of2012 Smt.KalyaniDevi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.O.P .Singh,Advocate FortheState:Mr.R.N.Roy,G.P.III 09/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Counselfortheapplicantfairlysubmitted,uponinstructionsfromhis client,thatfornoncomplianceoftheorder,againstwhichthiscontempt petitionhasbeenpreferred,hasnowbeencompliedwithbytheopposite parties,atbelatedstage.2. In view of this submission, this contempt petition is, hereby, dismissed. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
Rakesh Kumar Verma Alias Rakesh Verma Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3727 of 2012 Rakesh Kumar Verma @ Rakesh Verma... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Renu Devi ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Kailash Pd. Deo, Advocate 09/26.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 as well as the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to take his wife, today he has come with the railway ticket. Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 has submitted neither the O.P. No.2 come today nor she has send any instruction. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender in the co...
Dineshwar Pandit Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3262 of 2012 Dineshwar Pandit @ Dinesh Pandit .. ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Jayanti Devi ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Advocate 12/26.07.2013 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for some time, put up this case on 13.08.2013 under the same heading. Till then, interim order dated 18.03.2013 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Department of Road Constr ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ArbitrationAppealNo.3of2011 M/sShardaConstruction . Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheExecutiveEngineer, NationalHighwayDivision,Gumla .... Respondent With ArbitrationAppealNo.10of2010 TheStateofJharkhand&another . Appellants Versus M/sShardaConstruction .... Respondent With C.M.P.No.232of2013 TheStateofJharkhand&another . Petitioners Versus M/sShardaConstruction .... Respondent With I.A.No.3379of2013 CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL FortheShardaConstruction :Mr.RajKishorePrasad,Advocate FortheState :Mr.SaketUpadhyay,Advocate 06/Dated:26 th July,2013 I.A.No.3379of2013 1. This interlocutory application has been preferred for condonation of delayof335daysinfilingtherestorationapplication.2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasonsstatedinparagraphnos.4,5and6,therearereasonablereasonsfor condonationofdelayand,hence,thedelayis,hereby,condoned.3. Accordingly,I.A.No.3379of2013isallowedanddisposedof. C.M.P.No.232o...
Employers in Relation to the M Vs. their Workman Sri Ram Rabidas
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.L. No.2346 of 2012 Employers in relation to the Management of Ara Colliery of M/s C.C.L. .... Petitioner Versus Their Workman Sri Ram Sahay Rabidas ..... Respondent ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Ananda Sen For the Respondents : None I.A. No. 4535 o10. 26.07.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application vacation of the interim stay granted by this Court vide order dated 24.1.2013 has been sought on behalf of the applicant - son of the deceased workman in whose favour the impugned warded was rendered. However, no one appears to press this application today on behalf of the said applicant, who is not a party in the present writ application which is being pursued by the respondent- Union on behalf of the workman in question. It appears that counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent sworn by the applicant himself. In such circumstance, since none appears to press the instan...
Kumardhubi Metal Cast.Eng.Ltd. Vs. Karmchari Kumardhubi Congress
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Company Petition No.02 of 1996(R) M/s. Kumardhubi Metal Casting and Engineering Limited Petitioner Versus Kumardhubi Karmachari Congress and others Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. Lakhan Sharma For the Respondents: Mr. A.P. Verma ------ 117/ Dated: July, 26, 20131) Having heard both sides and looking to the report filed by the Official Liquidator dated 30th April, 2013, it appears that in the properties of the company, namely M/s. Kumardhubi Metal Casting and Engineering Limited, some illegal construction work is going on. There is a vast open land with the aforesaid Company.2) I, therefore, direct the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad to supply all necessary information to the Official Liquidator so that a proper application may be preferred for preventing the unauthorised construction or unauthorised activities going on, as alleged, within the open land or upon the land of the aforesaid Compa...
Vinay Kumar Agarwal Alias V K Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision. No. 103 of 2013 Vinay Kumar Agarwal @ V.K. Agarwal ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A. No. 5221 o4. 26.07.2013 The present interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner in view of the order dated 4.4.2013, passed in I.A. Nos. 1721 of 2013 and 1722 of 2013, whereby, further proceedings against the petitioner in the Court below was ordered to be stayed. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner filed the application in the Court below for staying the further proceedings against the petitioner and also for recalling the non-bailable warrant of arrest against him, but the Court below by order dated 4.5.2013, which has been brought on record as Annexure-B to this interlocutory application, has only stayed the further proceedings against the petitioner and has ...
Gopal Sah and anr Vs. Tata Motors Finance Limited
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ArbitrationAppealNo.14of2009 GopalSahandanother . Appellants Versus TATAMotorsFinanceLimited/TATAMotorsLimited throughitsManager,Ranchi .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL FortheAppellants :None FortheRespondent :None 12/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the appellants is absent.Neitherthematterismentionednoranybodyappearsonbehalfofthe appellants.2. Previouslyalsoon28th June,2013,nobodyappearedonbehalfofthe appellantsandthematterwasadjourned.3. Hence,thisappealisdismissedfordefault. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »