Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harendra Kumar Ghosh and Another Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2012 HarendraKumarGhosh&another . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :Mr.PratiushLala,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.A. 06/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the directiongivenbythisCourtvideorderdated2ndFebruary,2011inW.P.(S)No. 1352of2007,itappearsthatthereisduecomplianceoftheorderpassedby thisCourt,bytherespondentsofficers.Therespondentshavealreadypassedan orderdated17thJuly,2013whichisatAnnexureAtothecounteraffidavitfiled by the respondents. Looking to the order passed by the respondents dated 17thJuly,2013,thereisnodisobedienceoftheorderpassedbythisCourtdated 2ndFebruary,2011inW.P.(S)No.1352of2007,onthecontrary,thereisdue complianceoftheorderpassedbythisCourt,bytherespondents.Hence,this contemptapplicationis,hereby,dismissed.2. Personal appearance of the officers, as directed by this Court, is...
Basudeo Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 940 o1. Basudeo Yadav 2. Parwati Devi 3. Kamla Devi 4. Satya Prakash @ Satya Prakash Yadav 5. Om Kar Yadav @ Omkar ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 8/ 26.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 17.9.2012 passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVIII, Ranchi, in S.T. No. 106 of 2012, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C., for discharge, has been rejected by the Court below.3. The petitioners were earlier made accused in Sadar P.S. Case No. 285 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. No. 4719 of 2007 for the alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 306 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition...
Janki Bhuiyan Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No.3206 of 2006 Janki Bhuiyan ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand& Ors. ... ...Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner :Mr. M.M. Pan, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Saket Kumar Upadhyay 05/26.07.2013 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to supply the copy of rejoinder affidavit upon the counsel for the respondents and counsel for the respondents is directed to seek instruction on the Circular dated 31st July, 1980, Clauses 18 & 21 of which specifically state that in case of permanent as well as temporary employee, the pensionable period of service would be 10 years. Call the matter after two weeks. (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) Satyarthi...
Mahindra Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 157 of 2012 Mahindra Yadav ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Murari For the State : Mr. J.C. to S.C.-II ........ 4/26.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the matter is re-investigated by the C.I.D. so far acquisition of petitioner is concerned. Thus, he wants to withdraw this application at this stage. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this writs application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Ms Satyam Engineering and Construction Through Its Proprietor Namely R ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.796of2012 M/sSatyamEngineering&Construction Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:M/sPremPujari,R.K.Ojha,Advocates FortheRespondents:J.C.toA.G. :Mr.JaiPrakash,Sr.Advocate 06/Dated:26th July,2013 1. Thiscontemptpetitionhasbeenpreferredfornoncomplianceofthe order,passedbythisCourtdated1st August,2011inW.P.(C)No.1842of 2011.2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothe order passedbytheoppositepartyState,whichareatAnnexureAandB,thereis nowillfuldisobedienceoftheorder,passedbythisCourtdated1 stAugust, 2011inW.P.(C)No.1842of2011,bytheoppositeparties.Theopposite partieshavepasseddetailedspeakingorderandthelegallypayableamount hasalsobeenpaidtothepetitioner.3. Inviewofthesefacts,thiscontemptpetitionisdismissed.Libertyis reservedwiththepetitionertochallengetheorder,passedbytheopposite parties.4. Appearanceoftheofficerisnotrequiredtillfurtherorder.5. By o...
NalIn Soren Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.Directo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(Cr.)No.103of2012 NalinSoren............... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandthroughDirector,VigilanceOpp.Party Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr.Advocate FortheOpp.Party :M/sMd.SohailAnwar,A.G.,Shailesh, ....... I.A.No.5294of2013 17./26.07.2013 Heardlearnedsenior counselfor thepetitionerandthelearned AdvocateGeneralfortheState. Thelimitedprayer,whichhasbeenmadeinthisapplication,isto allow this petitioner to be taken to Assembly under police escort to participateintheproceedingoftheAssemblyon27thJuly2013. Beforethepetitionerwastakenintocustody,hehadmovedbefore theHon'bleSupremeCourtintheeventwhentheprayerforquashingofthe orderunderwhichwarrantofarresthadbeenissued,wasrejectedbythis Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court directed the petitioner to surrender beforethepoliceauthorityforthwith.Furtheritwasorderedthatifheis takenintocustodythenhewouldbeescortedtotheAssemblyincustody for the purpose of participating in the...
Ramgarh Inter Womens College Ramgarh Through Its Officating Secretary ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.791of2012 RamgarhInterWomen'sCollege,RamgarhPetitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Another .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.V .P.Singh,Sr.Advocate Mr.ArbindKumar,Advocate FortheState:Mr.RajeshKumar,G.P .V FortheJAC :Mr.Sohail,Sr.Advocate MrsRubyParween,Advocate 09/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Counselappearingforboththesidessubmittedthatnowanorder hasbeenpassedon25th July,2013constitutingaGoverningBodyofthe Ramgarh Inter Women's College, Ramgarh. The photocopy of the said orderistakenonrecordandacopyofthesameisgiventothecounselfor thepetitioner.2. Inviewofthissubmissionandlookingtotheorderdated25 th July, 2013,thiscontemptpetitionisherebydisposedofastheorder,passedby thisCourtinearlierwritpetitionhasbeendulycompliedwith. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sri Mangilal Chawla
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- C.M.P. No. 362 of 2012 ---- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur at Singhbhum East ... Petitioner. Versus Sri Mangilal Chawla ... ... Respondent. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Deepak Roshan, Advocate. For the Respondents : ----- ----- Order No. 04 Dated :26. h July 2013 Delay in filing this restoration petition is condoned in view of the fact that the Tax Appeal no.11/2007 was dismissed without notice to the parties and there is no need to issue notice to the respondents on the application for condonation of delay. In view the reasons given in the order dated 19th September, 2012 passed in C.M.P.NO.452/2011(The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna Vrs. Jai Prakash Singhania) and in view of the similar facts involved in the dismissal of T.A.NO.11/2007, this C.M.P is allowed and T.A.NO.11/2007 is restored to its original number. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) ( Jaya Roy,...
Khileshwari Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.587of2009 KhileshwariKumari . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&another .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.SatishKumarDeo,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toSr.S.C.I 10/Dated:26 th July,2013 Havingheardlearnedcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheorder passedbythisCourtdated6thDecember,2008inW.P.(S)No.2658of2003,it appearsthattherespondentshavealreadypassedadetailedspeakingorder dated30thDecember,2009whichisatAnnexureEtothecounteraffidavitfiled bytherespondentState.Thereisnowillfuldisobedienceoftheorderpassedby this Court by the respondent State authorities and, hence, this contempt application is, hereby, dismissed, reserving liberty with the petitioner to challengetheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated30th December,2009,in accordancewithlawandbeforeappropriateforum. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
Ranjeet Singh Alias Charne Alias Charness Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5675 of 2013 Ranjeet Singh @ Charne @ Charness .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Manish Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 26.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Chowka PS case No. 07 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 395/492 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from FIR that the accused persons occupying Indigo Car over-powered the informant and took possession of the chassis and fled away. After removing battery, tool box, tyre, the chassis was left abandoned. During investigation, one of the accused Sanni Singh, driver of the Indigo car, was apprehended and he confessed his guilt disclosing names of the petitioner and his associates. It is submitted that no recovery was made on the basis of confession made by this petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »