Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinanath Prasad Vs. Rural Works Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 3614 of 2013 Dinanath Prasad ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A Allam, Sr. S.C. II ---- 03/29-7-2013 Learned Sr. S.C. II submitted that the counter affidavit is in process and is likely to be filed in a couple of days. He has also informed that decision has been taken by the respondents to pay salary and within a day or two, appropriate order shall be issued for payment of the petitioner's salary. As prayed for, put up this case on 12th August, 2013. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Anil Kumar Dhosia Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilReviewNo.55of2011 AnilKumarDhosia ....Petitioner Versus UnionofIndiaandors. .....Opp.Parties CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL .... ForthePetitioner :M/sM.M.Pal,Sr.Adv.&S.C.Roy,Adv. FortheOpp.parties :Mr.R.N.Roy,Adv. Orderno.4 Dated29th July,2013 1. The petitioner's contention is that his writ petition was dismissedvideorderdated3rd February,2011,onthegroundthat thepetitionerdidnotrequestforremedicaltestwhereaspetitioner, infact,submittedhisrepresentationforremedicaltestalongwith others.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairlyadmitted that such representationwasnotplacedonrecordinthewritpetitionandit wasnotbroughttothenoticeoftheCourt,whenitwasdecidedon 3rdFebruary,2011.However,itissubmittedthatsuchlapsesmaybe condonedandthedocumentmaybeaccepted.3. Theoppositepartiesmayfilecounteraffidavitwhethersuch representationwasthereornotandwhetheritwasforwardedbythe concernedofficertothecompetentauthorityornot.4. Postthismatteraftert...
Munna Bahadur Alias Munna Thapa Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 4444 of 2013 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 429 of 2013 Munna Bahadur alias Munna Thapa Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. J.S. Tiwary For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 02/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed by the appellant for condonation of delay of 12 days in preferring the instant appeal.2) Having heard learned counsel and looking to the reasons stated in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the interlocutory application, there is reasonable reasons for condonation of delay of 12 days in preferring the appeal.3) Accordingly, I.A. No. 4444 of 2013 is allowed and delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned.4) Registry is directed to enlist the matter under the heading 'For Admission' on 5th August, 2013. (D. N....
Brijendra Kumar Choubey and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)No.4024of2008 BrijendraKumarChoubey&ors. ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.RahulKumar FortheRespondents :JCtoGA 829.7.2013 Thegrievanceofthepetitionersintheresentwritpetitionisthat they are not being given the benefit of seniority and promotion to Grade IV on the ground that they have completed their teachers' training course after several years of their appointments. These petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers after relaxation of conditionforqualificationofteachers'trainingintheAdvertisement dated6.10.1991.TheyjoinedasAssistantTeachersintheschoolsunder the State Government on different dates in the month of September,1994, vide Annexure 3 series. Atthe time of joining they wereallowedmatrictrainedscale(basic)whichwasmadeapplicable formatrictrainedteachers,I.A./I.Sc.untrainedteachersandB.A./B.Sc. untrainedteachers.Thesepetitionerswereinthe...
Shukun Gari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 4271 of 2013 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 439 of 2013 Shukun Gari Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. Dilip Kr Prasad For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 03/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed by the appellant for condonation of delay of 192 days in preferring the instant appeal.2) Having heard learned counsel and looking to the reasons stated in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the interlocutory application, there is reasonable reasons for condonation of delay of 192 days in preferring the appeal.3) Accordingly, I.A. No. 4271 of 2013 is allowed and delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned.4) Registry is directed to enlist the matter under the heading 'For Admission' on 5th August, 2013. (D. N. Patel, J) (...
Kamal Nayan Vs. the Union of India Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4180 of 2012 Kamal Nayan Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the C.B.I. : - Md. Mokhtar Khan, A.S.G.I. 04/29.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Kamal Nayan, in connection with R.C. Case No. 07 (A)/2011-D, pending in the court of learned Special Judge, C.B.I.-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, 1st, Dhanbad, is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Md. Mokhtar Khan, learned counsel for the C.B.I. It is alleged that petitioner dishonestly and fraudulently processed and passed 1 st & 2nd running bill of Rs. 70,61,367.01 & 46,29,709/- respectively of the Contractor, though no work has been completed on his behalf. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, anticipatory bail...
Jainab Bibi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 3309 of 2012 --- Jainab Bibi . ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. R.M. Singh, Adv. For the respondents : - -- Order No.06 Dated29th July, 2013. The petitioner, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 10.4.2012, whereby, the respondent No. 2 has cancel the Basgit Parcha issued in favour of the petitioner in Case no. 9/1981-82 by the Circle Officer, Chainpur and consequently, the Jamabandi opened in favour of the petitioner has also been cancelled. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and from perusal of the impugned order as well as materials placed on record, issue urgent show cause notice upon private respondents, for which, requisites etc. und3309er registered cover with A/D as well as ordinary process must...
Dudhnath Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.2178of2012 1.DudhnathYadav 2.SarjuYadav 3.MaltiDevi 4.SikandarYadav........... Petitioners Versus StateofJharkhand&Anr Opp.Parties Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioners :None FortheOpp.Parties :Mr.APP ....... 2./29.07.2013 The order dated 04/12/2010, passed in Complaint Case No. 73/2010, whereby cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 323,504,498A,494oftheIndianPenalCodeandalsounderSection3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, has been taken against the petitioners, is beingsoughttobequashedonthegroundthatwhateverallegationshave beenlevelled,thoseallegationsarefalse,concoctedandevenimaginary. The grounds, on which the order taking cognizance is being sought to be quashed, never appears to be tenable for the purpose of quashing of the order taking cognizance. Accordingly, order taking cognizance never warrants to be quashed and, hence, this application standsdismissed. (R.R.Prasad,J) Mukund/cp.3...
Gorkha Budiuli Alias Biruli and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1967 o1. Gorkha Budiuli @ Biruli 2. Shravan Kumar Sundi @ Sarban Kumar Sundi........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Ananda Sen For the State: Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey,APP 5/29.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Gorkha Budiuli @ Biruli and Shravan Kumar Sundi @ Sarban Kumar Sundi is moved by Sri Ananda Sen and opposed by Sri Anand Kumar Pandey, learned Additional P.P. It appears that co-accused Gindru Deogam has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 06.12.2012 in ABA No. 3646 of 2012. The case of petitioner stands on similar footing. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below by 12.08.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,...
Deo Kora Marandi Alias Deb Beta Marandi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 311 of 2013 Dev Kora Marandi @ Dev Beta Marandi Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Ms. Nalini Jha For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 04/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This appeal has already been admitted by this Court by order dated 13th June, 2013. Record and proceeding of the Sessions Trial No.140 of 2010 was called for from the trial Court (Sessions Judge, Godda) so as to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence awarded to the appellant-accused.2) Records and proceeding of the trial Court has been received by this Court.3) We have heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the record.4) Looking to the evidence on record, there is prima facie case against the accused-appellant. As the Criminal Appeal is pending, we are not much analyz...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »