Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Eiliyash Seikh Alias Eliyash Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6917 of 2013 ------- Eiliyash Seikh @ Eliyash Choudhary . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Dilip Kr. Chakraverty For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 3/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 124 of 2007, S.T. No. 240 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 413, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R. it appears that the case relates to recovery of stolen iron scrap from the godown of the petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Eiliyash Seikh @ Eliyash Choudhary, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfa...
Smt Ritu Chaubey Vs. Jawahar Lal Chaubey
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tr. Petition (Civil) No. 24 of 2012 --- Smt. Ritu Choubey ..... Petitioner Versus Jawahar Lal Choubey ..... Opp. Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opp. Party : - -- 8/31.07.2013 In view of office report dated 30.7.2013, learned counsel for the petitioner shall take steps for fresh service of notice by registered post with A/D as well as ordinary process, for which requisites must be filed within one week. In the meantime, ad-interim order passed earlier shall continue, till the next date of listing. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
Sujit Kumar and anr Vs. Directorate of Enforcement Patna Sub Zonal Off ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1298 o1. Sujit Kumar 2.Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh.Petitioners VERSUS Directorate of Enforcement and another.. Opposite Parties CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the Opp.Parties: Mr.A.K.Das, Advocate 8/ 31.7.13. This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of ECIR No. ECIR/02/PAT/11/AD including the order dated 11.4.2013 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act has been taken against the petitioners. Before adverting to the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners, case of the prosecution needs to be taken notice of. The case of the prosecution is that on search being made by the Income Tax Authorities in the houses situated at Ranchi and in the village of Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Singh, who happened to be the Private Secretary of the then Vidhan Sabha ...
Sarju Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3194 of 2013 Sarju Ram .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand * Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumit Prakash For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ,APP 2/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Shekhawat Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1500of2013 [email protected] Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.SahzadiKhatoon OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Md.RazaullahAnsari,Advocate FortheInformant :Md.MahadeoThakur,Advocte FortheState :A.P .P. 04/31.07.2013 PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithBarhiP.S.CaseNo.232of2012 correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.3798of2012,pendingintheCourtofSriAlok Kumar,learnedJudicialMagistrate,Hazaribag. After seeking consent from both sides the petitioner as well as the informant are directed to appear before the Mediation Center, JHALSA on 05.08.2013. Listthiscaseon12.08.2013withthereportoftheMediator. Theinterimorderdated13.06.2013shallcontinuetillthenextlisting. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Ajay Kalindi Alias Gulthan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6749 of 2013 Ajay Kalindi @ Gulthan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 379, 461 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No. 24 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 629 of 2012. The case relates to theft in a shop. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Ajay Kalindi @ Gulthan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella, in connection with Kan...
Hari Sao Vs. Food Supply
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No.2716 of 2013 Hari Sao .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. K.K.Singh For the Respondents : Mr. J.C. to G.P.III 03/31.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner is aggrieved in the present writ application by the order dated 17.11.2012 contained in memo no. 544 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Bermo (Tenughat) whereby the license of the fair price shop in the name of the petitioner being license no. 4 of 1992 has been placed under suspension but no final order has been passed, though 90 days period has been expired. It is contented on behalf of the petitioner that he has already submitted his reply vide Annexure-7 and 7/1 and under the provision of Section 11(2) of the Bihar/Jharkhand Trade Articles(Licenses Unification) order, 1984 the license cannot be put under suspension for more than 90 days. Learned cou...
Md Hasib Alias Babu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5400 of 2013 Md. Hasib @ Babu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 3/ 31.07.2013 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the order dated 3.7.2013, name of the petitioner has been wrongly written as 'Md. Harib @ Babu' at the place of 'Md. Hasib @ Babu'. Let the name of petitioner be correctly read in the order dated 3.7.2013 as 'Md. Hasib @ Babu' instead of 'Md. Harib @ Babu' and the certified copy of order dated 3.7.2013 be always issued along with this order. Let this order be communicated to the Court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Ms Gopal Ornaments Thr Its Proprietor Sri Purusottam Agarwal Alias Pur ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3536 of 2013 --- M/s. Gopal Ornaments & anr. ...Petitioners -Versus- Central Bank of India & anr. .....Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. For the Respondents : M/s. K. P. Choudhary & A.R.Choudhary,Advs. 03/31.7.2013 The Respondents-Bank has filed affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed time to file response to the same and come out with an offer in relation to liquidation of the entire decreetal amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage has submitted that he is ready to deposit Rs. 32 lakhs in lieu of the flat which is being auctioned sale for an amount of Rs. 30,16,000/- only and therefore the auction sale may not be confirmed. Learned counsel for the Bank states that auction sale has not been confirmed and the date is fixed on 6th August, 2013. In that view of the matter, let the case appear on 5th August, 2013 under the sam...
Ms Crystal Residency Through Its Director Shri Ranjan Kumar Vs. the Ai ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 4496 of 2013 --- M/s. Crystal Residency, Kadru Division Road, Ranchi ...Petitioner -Versus- The Airports Authority of India (Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi) & others .....Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Adv. For the Respondents : ------- -- 02/31.7.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking quashing of Notice Inviting Tender issued by respondent no.1, Airport Authority of India, Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi, dated 11th July, 2013 for hotel reservation counter at Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi. According to the petitioner in pursuance of N.I.T issued in October, 2009, it was allotted the concerned work for hotel reservation counter at Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi vide order dated 5th April, 2010 for a period 01/05/2010 to 30/04/2013. Thereafter, the respondents issued another N.I.T on 19th March, 2012 for the New Integrated Terminal Buil...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »