Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dal Govind Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.499of2012 DalGovindSingh . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.JaiPrakashSahu,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.IV 03/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Thematterisadjournedtobelistedon12thJuly,2013.2. The officers who were directed to remain present, shall remain personallypresentbeforethisCourtonthenextdateofhearingat10:30a.m. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
Syed Zafir Ahmad and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1156 o1. Syed Zafir Ahmad 2. Syed Zaid Ahmad @ Syed Zaheed Ahmad.....Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another...................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.Yogesh Modi For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.A.K.Choudahry 11/ 21.6.13. It was stated that the conciliation failed. In that view of the matter, the matter needs to be heard on its merit. Accordingly, put up this case for admission in the next week. Till then, interim order passed on 13.8.2012 shall continue. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No.2526 of 2012 Gopi Nandan Prasad ...... Petitioner Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Amicus Curiae For the State : Mr. Shamim Akhtar For the UPSC : Mr. Faizur Rahman, Advocate Order No.13 Dated 21st June, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A. No. 2873 of 2013 by which some grievances have been raised which is pertaining to individuals and that has nothing to do with the subject matter of this PIL whereby this Court wants to see that the vacancy of IAS cadre may be filled up, how it is filled up, it is decided by the Government in accordance with rule and such grievance cannot be entertained here. Therefore, this I.A. Is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy which is available to him in accordance with law. I.A. No. 2873 of 2013 stands dismissed. This Court has already mad...
Dr Anil Kumar Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.666 of 2013 Dr.Anil Kumar Choudhary .....................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another...................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:M/s.A.K.Sahani and Ajit Kumar For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.K.P.Choudahry 7/ 21.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submits that in spite of their best efforts conciliation failed. In that view of the matter, the matter needs to be heard on its merit. Accordingly, put up this case for admission in the next week. Till then, interim order passed on 7.5.2013 shall continue. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
israle Mian and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 458 o1. Isrile Mian 2. Naimuddin Mian ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arbind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 21.06.2013 This revision application will be heard. Admit. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to add the complainant as opposite party No. 2 in this application. Issue notice to the newly added opposite party No. 2, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week through registered cover with A/D as also through ordinary process, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Call for the Lower Court Records. During the pendency of this revision application, the petitioners, Isrile Mian and Naimuddin Mian, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each, wit...
M/S.Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. CemIndia Company Ltd.(at Prese
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ArbitrationAppealNo.11of2010 M/sBharatCokingCoalLtd.,Dhanbad . Appellant Versus CemindiaCompanyLtd.,Mumbai .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL FortheAppellant :Mr.AnoopKumarMehta,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mr.AjayKumarSah,Advocate 12/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learnedcounselforboththesidesareseekingtimemainlyforthereason thattodayoneinterlocutoryapplicationbeingI.A.No.3905of2013hasbeen filed for getting stay against the objection filed under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 has been rejected by the learned trial court and, therefore,thisapplicationhasbeenpreferredforgettingstay.2. Thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon26thJuly,2013.3. Ifreplyistobefiled,thesamewillbefiledbyothersideonorbeforethe nextdateofhearing. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
PravIn Kumar Agarwala Vs. Menes Area Development Authority Through Its ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2942 of 2013 --- Pravin Kumar Agarwala --- ---- --- Petitioner vs. Mines Area Development Authority through its Managing Director & Others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Shailesh, Advocate For the MADA: Mr. Bhawesh Kr. & Mr. Ravi Kr., Advocates --- 02/ 21.06.2013 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application. Accordingly, it is dismissed as withdrawn. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Suman Kumar Singh and ors Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2459 of 2013 Suman Kumar Singh and others ...... Petitioners Vrs. Coal India Limited and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. D.K. Dubey, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. Order No.3 Dated 21st June, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to implead Union of India as party- respondent. In view of the fact that in all connected matters, Union of India is a party-respondent, this oral prayer is allowed and Union of India is impleaded as party-respondent. Admit. List along with W.P.(T) No. 3087 of 2013 and connected matters. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 13.3.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioners fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the conce...
Jagdish Mandal and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. W.P(C) No.5790of 2004 Jagdish Mandal &Anr ................................... Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand &Ors .................. Respondent CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner :- Mr K.P.DeoAdv For the State-Respondents:- Mr.Prasad S.C L & C 2/21.6.2013. Today during course of hearing the I.A No. 3054 of 2013 the learned counsel for the petitioners produced the copy of notice dated 16th May,2013 issued by the SDO Deoghar in Misc Case No. 229 of 2013 whereby the petitioners have been asked to appear before SDO Deoghar on 28th May, 2013.This notice appears to issued as SDO Deoghar is apprehending the breach of peace in the area on account of disputes between the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-State Government requested for one week time to take instruction in the matter as he is not aware about the development which has been narrated by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners .The...
Bhartrihari Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.340of2013 BhartrihariSingh........... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandthroughVigilance&Anr Opp.Parties Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.MaheshTewari, Mr.V.S.Sahay,Advocates FortheState :Mr.APP ....... 6./21.06.2013 This application has been filed for quashing of the first information report of Special Case No. 24/1997, arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 15/1997, registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 474, 477A,420,409,120oftheIndianPenalCode,Section13(2)readwith13 (1)(d)oftheP.C.Act,1988andSection5(2)readwith5(1)(d)oftheP.C. Act,1947. ItisthecaseoftheVigilance,withrespectofthispetitioner,that oneS.S.Ali,thethenJuniorEngineer,RoadSubDivision,Purnea1,sent ahandwrittenrequisitionthroughoneofthestaffsoftheDivisiontoRoad Construction Division, Sahebganj, for providing 500 MT Bitumen. That requisition also contained the signature of this petitioner, who at the relevant point of time was posted as Assistant Engineer, Ro...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »