Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shibamoy Dutta and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1367of2013 with A.B.A.No.1393of2013 1.ShibamoyDutta .............. Petitioner(inA.B.A.No.1367of2013) 1.AmitGope@AmitKumarGope 2.ParthasarthiMandal ........ Petitioners(inA.B.A.No.1393of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.BharatKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/18.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals from the F.I.R. that after receiving instruction from the S.P., Dhanbad the premises of nonbanking company, running within the district, were inspected by the informant who happens to be a police officer. These petitionersrelatetoM/sRoseValleyHotels&EntertainmentsLtd.,Govindpur.It isallegedthatthecompanyhadbeenalluringthepeopletodoinvestmentand they would get higher rate of interest and in this manner they have been misleadingandcheatingthepeopleforthepurposeofraisingfund. Itissubmittedthatthesepetitionersareonlyemployeeofthecompany knownasRoseValleyHotels&Ent...
Manoj Kumar Kedia Alias M K Kedia Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1414 of 2013 Manoj Kumar Kedia @ M.K. Kedia Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. 03/18.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Manoj Kumar Kedia @ M.K. Kedia, in connection with C/1 Case No. 1993 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, is moved by Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Smt Niki Sinha, learned Additional P.P. for the State. It appears that petitioner took loan from Union Bank of India, Jamshedpur, but he did not return the said amount. It is further alleged that when the bank made inquiry regarding the sale deed used by the petitioner for sanction of loan. It has come to the knowledge of Bank that the said sale deed is forged. Considering the aforesaid allegation, I am not inclined to ...
Maruti Manna and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1183 o1. Maruti Manna 2. Pradip Manna @ Pradip Kumar Manna 3. Shib Dash Ghosh .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. R.S.Majumdar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 18.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Nala ( Bindapather ) PS case No. 162 of 2012 pending in the court of learned ACJM, Jamtara. It reveals from FIR that the accused persons followed the deceased on a motor cycle while he was returning home from the court. On the way, the accused persons killed him and threw the dead body within bushes. The incident was witnessed by Milan Manna who happens to be the son in law of the deceased. The matter was informed to the family members and thereafter the son of the deceased has lodged this case. It i...
indra Deo Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1442 of 2013 Indra Deo Prasad Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. 03/18.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Indra Deo Prasad, is moved by Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Additional P.P. for the State. This is a case under Sections 304B/34 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is father-in-law of deceased's sister-in-law. F.I.R. reveals that petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. There is no allegation against him that he demanded dowry and / or torture deceased for the said demand. It also appears that police, after investigation, has not sent him for trial, but the learned Magistrate took cognizance against him. However, learned Additional P.P., after going though th...
Laxman Ram and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 2920 of 2011 --- Laxman Ram & Ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, Adv. For the respondents : J.C to G.A - -- 13/18.06.2013 As prayed for, put up this case on 02.07.2013. In the meantime, ad interim order passed earlier shall continue, till the next date. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
Ayub Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2184 of 2013 Ayub Ansari .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2 For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP 2/18.06.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
The State of Jharkhand Through Deputy Commissioner Vs. Panchanand Chou ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 132 of 2013 The State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Godda ... Appellant Versus Panchanand Choudhary ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, G.P.-V For the Respondent : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate ------ Order No. 05 Dated 18th June, 2013 I.A. No. 2432 of 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties on application for condonation of delay being I.A. No. 2432 of 2013. There is delay of 24 days in filing the L.P.A. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the L.P.A. is condoned and I.A. No. 2432 of 2013 is allowed. L.P.A. No. 132 of 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties on merits. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the petitioner/ respondent, before entering into the contract, voluntarily agreed to the condition which the petitioner sought to challenge in the writ petition and in earlier ro...
Md Razi and anr Vs. Rameshwar Pd Sah and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision. No. 15 of 2013 --- Md. Razi & Anr. ..... Petitioners Versus Rameshwar Pd. Sah & Ors. ...... Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : Mr. Shashi Kumar, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : - -- 2/18.06.2013 The present revision is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure for a direction against the order dated 10.06.2013 passed in T.Exe. No.01/2010 by Sr. Civil Judge-I, Dumka, whereby objection with respect to maintainability of the execution case filed by the petitioners have been rejected. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of materials placed on record, urgent show cause notice be issued to respondent No.1, 2 and 3 and the same be served through personal service on advocate of the opposite parties appearing in the court below. Requisite to be paid within two days. Affidavit regarding service be filed before returnable date. The returnable date of notice is 02.0...
Amit Gope Alias Amit Kumar Gope and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1367of2013 with A.B.A.No.1393of2013 1.ShibamoyDutta .............. Petitioner(inA.B.A.No.1367of2013) 1.AmitGope@AmitKumarGope 2.ParthasarthiMandal ........ Petitioners(inA.B.A.No.1393of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.BharatKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/18.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals from the F.I.R. that after receiving instruction from the S.P., Dhanbad the premises of nonbanking company, running within the district, were inspected by the informant who happens to be a police officer. These petitionersrelatetoM/sRoseValleyHotels&EntertainmentsLtd.,Govindpur.It isallegedthatthecompanyhadbeenalluringthepeopletodoinvestmentand they would get higher rate of interest and in this manner they have been misleadingandcheatingthepeopleforthepurposeofraisingfund. Itissubmittedthatthesepetitionersareonlyemployeeofthecompany knownasRoseValleyHotels&Ent...
Maa Kaleshwari Construction and anr Vs. C C L
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3472 of 2013 Maa Kaleshwari Construction & Anr. ... Petitioners Versus Coal India Limited & others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. A.K.Mehta, Advocate. ------ Order No. 02 Dated 18th June, 2013 Admit. List along with W.P.(T) Nos. 3087 of 2013, 3264 of 2013 and 3490 of 2013. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 7th May, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »