Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Christiana Hansda Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 17 of 2012 Christiana Hansda ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to G.P. V ---- I.A. No. 2360/2013 04/19-06-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has payed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.(S) No.17 of 2012 under the heading For Admission. It has been submitted that the petitioner is a lady officer and she has been discriminated in consideration for giving promotion to the I.A.S. Cadre only because of the frivolous departmental proceeding, which has been challenged in the writ petition. The career of the petitioner is at stake due to pendency of the said departmental proceeding and the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, if the writ petition is not heard at an early date. Learned J.C. to G.P. V, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection in fixing an...
Md Zafar Alam and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1738 o1. Md Zafar Alam 2. Sanjeeda Begum .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Dr. H. Waris For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Doranda PS case No. 55 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 498A/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioners have been prosecuted for committing torture and treating the complainant with cruelty for want of more dowry. It is submitted that the petitioners are father in law and mother in law and no specific over act has been alleged against them. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, both the petitioners above na...
Etwa Minz Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.135of2013 EtwaMinz .......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondents. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.YogeshModi,Advocate FortheState:Mr.ShekharSinha,A.P .P. th 06/Dated:19 June,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. ThisappealhasbeenAdmittedvideorderdated1stApril,2013 andtherecordandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.38of2008was called from the trial court so as to appreciate the arguments for suspension of sentence. This appellant has been convicted by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court, Khunti in Sessions Trial No. 38 of 2008 and has been sentenced toundergo rigorousimprisonmentfor10yearsmainlyfortheoffencepunishable underSections307andotherSectionsoftheIndianPenalCodeand thesentenceshavebeendirectedtorunconcurrently.2. ThisCourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrial courtandwehaveperusedthesame.3. Havingheardlearnedcounselforboththesidesandlookingto...
Kishore Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1490 of 2012 Kishore Kumar ...........................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Nanda For the State : A.P.P 10.19.6.13. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 26.6.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 3.9.2012 shall continue. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tetru Pradhan and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.63 o1. Tetru Pradhan 2. Ropna Pradhan Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ------ For the Appellants: M/s Rajendra Prasad Gupta For the Respondents: Mr. Krishna Shankar ----- th 09/Dated 19 June1. This criminal appeal has been admitted vide order dated 9th May, 2013 and records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 133 of 2001 was called for from the trial court so as to appreciate the arguments on suspension of sentence.2. This appeal was preferred with a delay of 3070 days. The appellants have been in jail since the year 2000, i.e. for approximately 13 years. They have been convicted and awarded sentence for the offence punishable under section 302 I.P.C.3. This court is in receipt of the records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 133 of 2001 and we have perused the same.4. Having heard counsel for both sides and l...
Sunil Khalkho Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 714 of 2013 Sunil Khalkho .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the State: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, APP 6/19.06.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ms Bharti Telemedia Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Sign ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 408 of 2013 M/s Bharti Telemedia Limited. ... ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.. Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 909 of 2013 Tata Sky Limited ... ... ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors .. Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 1043 of 2013 Bharat Business Channel Limited... ..... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 1097 of 2013 Dish T V India Limited ... ... ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 3023 of 2013 M/s Reliance Big TV Ltd. ... ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mr. B. Poddar, Sr. Adv. M/s Darshana P. Mishra, Piyush Poddar, Amrita Sinha & Bharat Kumar Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. A.R. Choudhary Order No. 16 ------ Dated 19th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in W.P.T No. 302...
Dhaneshwar Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1992 of 2012 Dhaneshwar Mandal ..........................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another......... .Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Ms.M.Chatterjee For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :Mr.Anjani Kumar Singh 5/ 19.6.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that before the instant case was lodged in which cognizance of the offence was taken under Sections 498A, 323,324,506 of the Indian Penal Code, one case had earlier been lodged with respect to commission of offence under Section 498A and also under Section 307 as well as other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code in which petitioner was acquitted, though on the basis of the compromise. Thereafter again a case was lodged but on the basis of allegation, a proceeding under Section 107 was drawn and ...
Budhan Mahto and Other Vs. Cheto Mahto and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3700 of 2012 Budhan Mahto & others ....Petitioners Versus Cheto Mahto & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. V.K. Prasad, Advocate /19.6.2013: Petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/ direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 22.5.2012, passed by the learned Sub-Judge IV, Giridih in Title Suit No. 155 of 1991, whereby the learned court-below allowed the plaintiffs to lead evidence and examine their witnesses. It is further prayed that the learned court-below may be directed to dispose of the Title Suit No. 155 of 1991 expeditiously within a time frame. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that...
Vijay Kumar Choubey Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 822 of 2013 Vijay Kumar Choubey .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. S.P. Roy For the State: Mrs. Rashmi Kumari, APP 6/19.06.2013: As prayed by learned Additional P.P., put up this case on 24.06.2013. In the meantime, interim order dated 02.05.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »