Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhruv Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4208 of 2012 Dhruv Kumar Agrawal ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the Informant : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Advocate 08/19.06.2013 Put up this case on 27.06.2013 under the same heading in chamber at 2:15 PM. On that very date both the parties will remain physically present before this Court with their counsels. Till then, interim order dated 30.01.2013 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
Krishna Mohan Mandal Alias Kishan Mandal and ors Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1816 of 2013 Krishna Mohan Mandal @ Kishan Mandal and others .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Rajeeva Sharma For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Jarmundi PS case No. 188 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 304/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 40 of the Coal Mines Act and section 33 of the Indian Forest Act and sections 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. It reveals from fard beyan of the chaukidar that two persons namely Mahendra Singh and Sahindra Singh sustained injuries in an explosion caused for the purpose of mining in the forest and died. The informant could further learn that these petitioners are also indulged in illegal ...
Pappu Sao Alias Sanjiv Kumar Sao Alias Sanjiv Kumar Shaw Vs. the State ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1735 o1. Guddi Devi 2. Moti Saw .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): M/s A.K.Kashyap & Lina Shakti For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Chiniya PS case No. 25 of 2012 for the offence registered under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It reveals from the written report that 86 quintals of rice loaded on a tractor was seized by Chiniya Police on 31.10.2012. After holding inquiry and verification, it was detected that said rice was supplied to Ganga Mahila self help group of which petitioner no.1 is President and petitioner no.2 is her husband and thereafter this case has been lodged. It is submitted that rice was seized on 31.10.2012, but no case was institu...
Asfa Bibi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1747 of 2013 Asfa Bibi .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Md Faruque Ansari For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioner in connection with Mohammadganj PS case No. 15 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 148/323/341/337/324 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the written report that the petitioner and his associated have assaulted the informant and his companion and the occurrence took place due to land dispute. It is submitted that the petitioner is a lady and there is allegation that she has pelted stones in course of the incident. Co-accused Kausar Bibi who is also a lady, has been granted bail by the learned court below in ABP No. 163 of 2013. Learned counsel for t...
Birbal Sao and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1518of2013 1.BirbalSao 2.SanjayKumarGupta@SanjaySao 3.SonuKumar 4.SunilSao@SunilSahu 5.ArjunSao 6.SheoKumarSao Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.JaiPrakash,Sr.Advocate Mrs.ChaitaliC.Sinha,Advocte FortheInformant :Mr.PrabhatKr.Sinha,Advocte FortheState :A.P .P. 02/19.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It is alleged in the written report that the informant was forcibly kidnapped by the petitioners and compelled to sign on certain papers with instructiontogetthecasesettledwhichhasbeenlodgedagainsthisbrotherby thedaughterofpetitionerno.1.Notonlyinhumanbehaviourwasdonebythe accusedpersonsbuttheyalsoassaultedtheinformantandtookawaycashand wristwatchfromhispossession. ItissubmittedthatPritiDevi,daughterofpetitionerno.1,haslodgeda case againstpresent informantand his family members under Section 498A I.P.C.and3/4oftheDowryProhibitionAct.Onlytocreatepressure,husbandof P...
Sunil Kumar Rajak Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1795of2013 SunilKumarRajak Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.PrabhashCh.Sinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/19.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatthreetrucksloadedwithPoracoal wereapprehendedbythepolice.Theoccupantsofthevehicledidnotproduce valid document and therefore, the vehicles loaded with coal were seized. Duringverificationandinterrogationitwasdetectedthatcoalcollectedthrough illegalminingwasstoredwithintheforestareaandlateritwasconvertedinto poracoalforitstransportationandsale. Itissubmittedthattheownerofthetruckbearingregistrationnot JH02K 0741hasbeengrantedbailvideA.B.A.No.3668of2011. Thepetitionerhas beenarrayedasaccusedbecausetheownerhasgivenstatementthatpetitioner was driver of said truck at the relevant point of time. Some other accused personshavealsobeengrantedbailvideA.B.A.No.3158of2011. Learnedcounselappearing...
Guddi Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1715 of 2013 Anita Kumari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioner in connection with Ramgarh PS case No. 132 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 147/148/149/307/323/324/341/342/353/332/333/337/338/379 IPC It reveals from FIR that a mob led by the petitioner and co-accused Manoj Mahato has created jaam on the road (NH23) causing hindrance to traffic. When the police party reached and tried to disperse the mob, members in the mob became furious and violent and they pelted stones causing injuries to the police personnel. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitio...
Ms Swastika Smokeless Co Pvt Ltd Through Its Managing Director Pramod ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3357 of 2013 M/s Swastika Smokeless Coke Co. Pvt. Ltd. ...... Petitioner Vrs. Coal India Limited and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. A.K. Mehta, Adv. Order No.2 Dated 19th June, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner may remove the defects in the course of the day. Admit. List this matter along with W.P.(T) No.3087 of 2013 and connected matters. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 07.5.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioner is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioner fails in the writ petition then he shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir...
Bihar Public Service Commission Bpsc Through Chair Vs. Nemi Chand Vija ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 287 of 2012 with I.A. Nos.2979/2013, 2980/2013 & 2981/2013 Bihar Public Service Commission(BPSC) ...... Appellant Vrs. Nemi Chand Vijay and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Kishore Prasad, Adv. Order No.11 Dated 19th June, 2013. I.A. No. 2979 of 2013 has been filed by the son of the respondent-petitioner namely Nemi Chand Vijay in which it has been informed that the sole respondent-petitioner Nemi Chand Vijay died in an accident on 12.3.2013 leaving behind his sole legal heir and representative namely Prem Chand Vijay. In this application, prayer has been made that Prem Chand Vijay may be impleaded as sole legal heir of deceased respondent-petitioner. Though, it is the duty of the appellant to move application for substitution after the intimation received by the appellant by this application...
Basuki Nath Tudu and anr Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(C)No.267of2013 BasukiNathTudu&another ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners :M/sNikiSinha&S.B.Deo FortheRespondents :M/sR.Kumar&SanjayPiprawall 319.6.2013 ThepetitionershaveapproachedthisCourtfortworeliefs;(1) that the respondents be asked to show why result of the limited (departmental)examination forappointmentonthepostofDeputy Collectorheldintheyear2006hasnotbeenpublishedtilldateand(2) the respondentsbedirectednottoholdthelimited (departmental) examination forappointment tothesamepostinpursuancetothe advertisementdated8thOctober,2010tilltheresultofthefirstlimited (departmental)examinationheldin2006isdeclared. Inpara14and19ofthecounteraffidavitfiledonbehalfofthe respondent nos.3,4 and 5, it has been categorically stated that the conductofthefirstlimited(departmental)competitive examination forthepostofDeputyCollectorheldin2006isunderinvestigationby CBIandani...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »