Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sukul Kisan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 1275 of 2013 IN Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 1000 of 2010 Sukul Kisan Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD For the Appellant : Mr. J.S. Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. 6/20th of June, 2013 Oral Order : Per D.N. Patel, J.1. Present interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence, during pendency of this appeal, awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Garhwa in S.T. No. 300 of 2006 to the present applicant-Sukul Kisan for the offence mainly punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for life imprisonment.2. This Court has received the records and proceedings of S.T. No. 300 of 2006 and we have perused the same and heard the both sides at length.3. Looking to the evidences on record, it appears that the prosecution has examined total nine prosecution witness...
State of Jharkhand and ors Vs. Arun Kumar Dhar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 262 of 2011 The State of Jharkhand & Others ... Appellants Versus Arun Kumar Dhar ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ------ For the Appellants : Mr. Shamim Akhtar, S.C. (Mines) For the Respondent : M/s. Rajendra Krishna, Krishna Shankar & Amit Sinha, Advocates ------ Order No. 07 Dated 20th June, 2013 The petitioner was served with a notice of his retirement with effect from 30.09.2010 assuming that petitioner shall be deemed to have been appointed at the age of 18 years. The petitioner challenged the said communication superannuating the petitioner. The petitioner's writ petition was allowed vide order dated 08.03.2011 directing the respondents to accept the petitioner's actual and recorded date of birth. It has been held that petitioner will be continued in service and shall be paid the emoluments till he attains the age of superannuation ac...
Sasanka Mallik Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2321 of 2012 Sasanka Mallik ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Mamta Mallik ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Lochan, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. R.C.P. Sah, Advocate 13/20.06.2013 As a last indulgence given to the counsel appearing for the petitioner, put up this case on 11.07.2013 in chamber at 1:40PM under the same heading. Till then, interim order dated 22.11.2012 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.5333of2003 DilipKumarYadav Petitioner Versus TheUnionofIndia&Others Respondents CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.VijayShankarJha,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.PrabhashKumar,C.G.C. 10/20.06.2013 I.A.No.3747of2013: An interlocutory application has been filed seeking amendmentinthewritpetitionbysubstitutingtheUnionofIndia through Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi in place of the original respondentno.1 Learned counsel Mr. Prabhash Kumar appears for Union of India and states that he has no objection if this amendmentpetitionisallowed. In view of the averments made in the interlocutory application,I.A.No.3747of2013isallowed. Requisitesetc.willbefiledunderregisteredcoverwith A/Dwithinaperiodoftwoweeks,failingwhichthiswritpetition asagainsttheconcernedrespondentwillstanddismissedwithout furtherreferencetotheCourt. Itwillbeopentothenewlyaddedrespondenttofile counteraffi...
Jaleshwar Modi and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1810of2013 1.JaleshwarModi 2.BabluModi 3.MantuModi Petitioners Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.KeshuDevi OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners:Mrs.VandanaSingh,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/20.06.2013 Petitioners are accused in connection with Complaint Case No.495 of 2010,pendingintheCourtofSriKumarDinesh,learnedSubDivisionalJudicial Magistrate,Bokaro. As prayed, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawnwithlibertytothepetitionerstosurrenderbeforetheCourtbelowfor seekingregularbail. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Annabul Ansari Alias Md Annabul Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2303of2013 [email protected] Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.PranPranay,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithJasidihRailP.S.CaseNo.11of 2012, corresponding to G.R. Case No.40 of 2012, pending in the Court of learnedRailwayJ.M.,Madhupur. Itappearsthattheaccusedpersons,afteranaccident,createdjamonthe railwaytrackandalsocausedhindranceindischargeofofficialduty. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbailand submittedthatpetitionerhasbeendirectedbythelearnedSessionsJudgeto surrenderbeforetheCourtbelowbutinsteadofsurrenderingbeforetheCourt belowhehaspreferredthisanticipatorybailapplication. IhavegonethroughtheimpugnedorderinwhichlearnedSessionsJudge hasclearlyindicatedanddirectedthepetitionertosurrenderbeforetheCourt belowwithinthreeweeksandonsuchsurrendertheprayerforbails...
Ranjit Prasad Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1925 of 2013 Ranjit Prasad Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Dilip Kumar Prasad For the State: Mr. Amitabh 4/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Ranjit Prasad Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav is moved by Sri Dilip Kumar Prasad and opposed by Sri Amitabh, learned Additional P.P. It appears that petitioner is owner of Truck bearing No. JH04D-0576. From the said Truck 18 to 20 tones of coal seized. On query, the driver of the truck disclosed that the papers relating to the said coal is lying with the present petitioner. It is stated that later on petitioner produced the said papers in the police station through one Balmukund Pandey and after verification, I.O. found that the papers are genuine. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surre...
Chandrika Mahto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2195 of 2013. ----- 1. Chandrika Mahto 2. Bina Devi Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Mamta Devi Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri. K.P.Deo. For the State : Sri.G.S.Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Chandrika Mahto and Bina Devi is moved by Sri. K.P.Deo , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. G.S.Prasad , Addl P.P. for the State. This is a case under section 498 (A) of the I.P.C and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no.1 is father-in-law whereas petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the informant. There is general and omnibus allegations against these petitioners. No overt act alleged against them. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 01/07/2013 . If petitioners surrend...
Bablu Munda Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1838of2013 BabluMunda Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.NileshKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatatruckbearingregistrationnot JH 02N0663wasapprehendedbythepoliceandthepersonsatwhoseinstance loadingofcoalonthetruckwasgoingon,fledaway.Thetruckwasloadedwith 8M.T.ofcoal. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerhasnoconcerneitherwiththecoalorwith thetruckseizedinthisconnection.Itisincorrecttosaythathewaspresentat theplaceofoccurrenceandhefledawayafterseeingthepoliceparty. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbailbut concedesthattheI.O.hasnotmentionedaboutthecriminalantecedentofthe petitionerinthecasediary. Considering aforesaid aspect of the matter, above named petitioner is directedtosurrenderbeforethe Courtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeks from today and on such surrender he is directed to be...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.3597of2013 Courtonitsownmotion .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.IndrajitSinha FortheRespondents :Mr.SohailAnwar,A.G. th OrderNo. Dated,20 June,2013 LearnedcounselShriIndrajitSinhahasbroughttoour notice that one N.G.O. Mahila Sewa Samiti having its registered officeat5,GovernmentPlace,NorthKolkata62hadonegirlchild whowasinitiallynamedasKabutarnowpresentlysheisusingher nameasPujaRadhaSinghwaslivingintheMahilaSewaSamiti, RajpurCareHomeat24ParganaSouthintheWestBengalbecause thecustodyofthisgirlwasgiventoMahilaSewaSamitibySocial Welfare Board, Govt. of West Bengal in the year 2010. The membersofMahilaSewaSamiti,Kolkatacametoknowthatthe said girl's parents are residing in Joraphatak in Dhansar police station inthe District of Dhanbad. Finding this, twomembers of MahilaSewaSamitibroughtthesaidgirlKabutar@PujaRadha SinghtoJor...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »