Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Har Dayal Singh Alias Sardar Har Dayal Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1963 o1. Har Dayal Singh @ Sardar Har Dayal Singh 2. Simu Singh @ Sardar Sibu Singh ...........Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr. For the State :A.P.P 3.24.6.13. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 28.6.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in C.P.case no.639 of 2007, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Deep Sahakari Ghrih Nirman Sam Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 260 of 2012 --- Deep Sahakari Ghrih Nirman Samittee Simit --- --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate For the State: Mr. Sumir Prasad, SC-1 --- I.A. No. 2869 /2013 05/ 24.06.2013 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the official respondents are carrying out construction in spite of an order passed earlier on the submission of the counsel for the respondent State. Counsel for the respondent state Mr. Sumir Prasad seeks sometime to obtain instruction in the matter. List the case after two weeks along with Cont. Case (Civil) No. 408/13 under the same heading. In the meantime, status quo as on today, shall be maintained. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Tag this Judgment!Jitendra Gupta Vs. Kunal Chakraborty
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4962 of 2012 Jitendra Gupta ....Petitioner Versus Kunal Chakraborty Respondent -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate /24.6.2013: Petitioner, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article- 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/ direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 27.7.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Chaibasa in Eviction Suit No. 4 of 2012, whereby petition filed by the plaintiff under Order-VI Rule 17 of the CPC for amending the plaint has been allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. On perusal of the reasons assigned by the learned court-below, it appears that the learned court-below has passed the order after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Pampa Nandy Alias Pampa Das Alias Pampa Nandi Vs. the State of Jha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.2008 of 2012 Smt. Pampa Nandy @ Pampa Das @ Pampa Nandi and others ..................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .................. Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.Rajesh Kumar 2/ 24.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Major Manoj Kumar Jha Alias Manoj Kumar Jha Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1982 o1. Major Manoj Kumar Jha @ Manoj Kumar Jha 2. Dhaneshwar Jha...............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the State :A.P.P 4.24.6.13. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 28.6.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in C.P.case no.924 of 2010, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Ranchi. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioners. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Chandeshwar Roy Vs. Information Technology
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.5323 of 2012 Chandeshwar Roy .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Respondents : Mr. Sumir Prasad 03/ 24.06.2013 Issue notice upon the respondent no.2, Ramesh Kumar Chourasia under ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within 1 week, failing which, this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. In the meantime, operation of the impugned order 20.6.2011 shall remain stayed. A. Mohanty (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)...
Tag this Judgment!Sarojini Memorial Trust Through Its Chairman Sri M Some Shekhar Rao Vs ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.2976 of 2013 Sarojini Memorial Trust .... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Rajiv Ranjan For the Respondents : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, A.S.G.I. & J.C. to G.A. 03/ 24.06.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that they have made a representation contained at Annexure-14 to the writ application dated 26.3.2013 before the A.I.C.T.E. for reconsidering the request for revisiting / inspection of the petitioner's college/ premises as apparently they have complied with all the deficiencies pointed out by the earlier inspection committee. It is further submitted that if the revisiting is done within a short period of time, the respondents would surely find that the institute has complied with all such direction for removing deficiencies. However, if the representation of the petitioner is not considered then they would loose the...
Tag this Judgment!Dilip Nandi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1941 of 2012 Dilip Nandi .......................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.P.P.N.Rai, Sr. Advocate 2/ 24.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application so as to ventilate his grievance before an appropriate court. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Bachani Alias Bhakni Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 4638 of 2012 Bachani @ Bhakni Devi .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha For the State: Mr. Shashank Shekhar Prasad, APP 7/24.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Bachani @ Bhakni Devi is moved by Sri Jyoti Prasad Sinha and opposed by Sri Shashank Shekhar Prasad, learned Additional P.P. Complainant has lodged an FIR vide Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 125 of 2007 dated 08.09.2007, alleging therein that this petitioner killed his daughter for demand of dowry. However, in the said case, he filed a petition in the court of CJM, Hazaribagh and has categorically stated that his Son-in-Law, Samdhi and Samdhin have no hand in the death of his daughter. He further stated that he lodged the said FIR on some mistaken belief. It appears that police after investigation, submitted final form. Later on, present prote...
Tag this Judgment!SachIn Kumar Bamalia Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1785 o1. Sachin Kumar Bamalia @ Sachin Bamalia 2. Sandip Bamalia............... ..............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand .................................... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.A.K.Chaturvedi For the State :A.P.P 2.24.6.13. The order dated 2.4.2012 under which cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Excise Act has been taken is being sought to be quashed on the ground that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that recovery was made from the co-accused, namely, Praful Yadav, who disclosed about the name of the petitioners as the persons, who had kept foreign liquor at that place. The ground on which the order taking cognizance is being sought tobe quashed does not appear to be tenable. Accordingly, the order taking cognizance never ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »