Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asha Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.1637of2012 In Cr.Appeal(DB)No.591of2011 AshaMishra Appellant Versus StateofJharkhand ........Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH. FortheAppellant :Mr.TarunKumar,Advocate. FortheState:Mr.G.S.Prasad,A.P.P. 08/Dated:15 th April,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Counsel appearing for the applicant (original appellant) seeks permissiontowithdrawthisapplication.2. Permission,assoughtfor,isgranted.3. Thisinterlocutoryapplicationisdisposedofaswithdrawn. (D.N.Patel,J) (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) VK/...
Shankar Yadav and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.16 o1. Shankar Yadav 2. Shushil Yadav 3. Sarju Yadav 4.Sunil Yadav 5.Sudhir Yadav 6.Fuchi Mahto 7. Ganesh Yadav @ Gangesh Yadav..................Petitioners VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners :Mr. K.P.Deo For the State :A.P.P 2.15.4.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on the allegation that the petitioners had cut away a tree in the year 1989 situated at plot no.567, appertaining to Jamabandi no.52 situated in Mouza Panchhiyari Kothiya, District- Deoghar, a case was registered under Section 379 and allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. In that case, the petitioners were acquitted. Subsequently, after the petitioners were acquitted, another case was lodged for the same set of allegation which was quashed by the Patna High Court in Cr.Misc. No.9836 of 1999 and now again a case has been lodged with respect to cuttin...
Smt.indrani Dutta Vs. Debasis Mukherjee and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.521of2011 Smt.IndraniDutta ... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Opp.Parties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.M.K.Laik,Sr.Advocate FortheState :Mr. th 05/Dated:15 April,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.1. Counsel appearing for the applicant is not pressing this application, because against the very same impugned judgment underprovisotoSection372Cr.P.C.,alreadystatutoryappealhas beenpreferredbythepresentapplicant.2. Inviewofthestatementmadebythecounselfortheapplicant, thisCr.M.P.isdisposedofasnotpressedatthisstage. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Manish/R.K....
Ram Badan Ram and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 48 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 54 of 2013. ----- 1. Basanti Devi 2. Santosh Kumar @ Anand Petitioners in ABA 48/13.3. Ram Badan Ram 4. Indrajeet Kumar @ Guddu Petitioners in ABA 54/13. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Ganesh Das Opposite Parties. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri. Indrajit Sinha For the Opposite Parties : Sri. V.K. Tiwari, A.P.P. Sri Sanjeev Thakur ----- 03/15.04.2013. Both the applications arose from same First Information Report, thus are heard together and disposed of by this order. Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both cases, Sri V.K. Tiwari, Addl. P.P. for the State and Sri Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2. It is alleged that the petitioners took Rs.3,60,000/- at the time of engagement of the marriage and thereafter, they demanded more money from the complainant. When complainant refus...
Pramod Agarwal Vs. Mining Area Development Authority and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.55of2013 PramodAgarwal . Petitioner Versus 1.KrishnaKishore,theChairmancumManagingDirectorof MineralAreaDevelopmentAuthority,Dhanbad 2.StateofJharkhand .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.Shailesh,Advocate ForOppositePartyNo.1 :Mr.BhaweshKumar,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.A. 03/Dated:15 th April,2013 1. Learnedcounselappearingforthepetitionersubmittedthattheplans for the construction of residential unit was placed before the opposite partiesintheyear2011andfornojustifiablereason,theoppositeparties haveremaineddormantandsilent,despitetheorderpassedbythisCourt inearlierwritpetitionbeingW.P.(C)No.3864of2012dated15thOctober, 2012.2. Learnedcounselforoppositepartyno.1submittedthatadetailed counteraffidavithasbeenfiledandtheplanshavenowbeensanctioned, today. It is also submitted that opposite party no. 1 has tendered unconditionalapologyinparagraph1andinsubsequentparagraphs.3. Havingheardlearnedcouns...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bimaldeep Mineral Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI T.A.No.52of2006 CommissionerofIncomeTax,Patna.... .... .... Appellant Versus BimaldeepMineralPvt.Ltd. .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mr.BinodPoddar,Sr.Advocate th OrderNo.08 Dated,15 April,2013 Inadvertentlyintheorderdated17thDecember,2012,it wasorderedthatthematterbelistedforAdmission. Ithasbeenpointedoutthattodaythesaiddefectsare there,therefore,twoweeks'timeisgrantedtothecounselforthe appellanttoremovethedefects. However,incasedefectsarenotremoved,thenlistfor OrdersandifthedefectsareremovedthenlistforAdmission. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Saddam HussaIn Alias Saddam Sk Alias Saddam Husen Vs. the State of Jha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2258of2013 SaddamHussain@SaddamSk.@SaddamHusem Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.RakeshKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 03/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatinformantwasforciblytakenbytheaccused personstotheorchardofRafizuddinSheikhwherehewassubjectedtoassault. ItisfurtherallegedthatoneoftheaccusedLambuSheikhtriggeredthepistol butitdidnotfire.Thereafter,theaccusedpersonsfledaway. It is submitted that the informant had sustained simple injury on his person. Theincidenthasbeenexaggeratedbytheinformantduetoprevious enmityandthepetitionerhasbeeninjailsincelasttwomonths. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringfactsandcircumstances,abovenamedpetitionerisdirected to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthe Courtoflea...
Rama Shankar Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.19 o1. Rama Shankar Singh @ R.S.Singh 2. Chandra Prakash Pandey ..............................Petitioners VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and others ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners :Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :A.P.P 4.15.4.13. Learned counsel appearing for the State accepts notice on behalf of opposite parties 2 and 3. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 7.5.2013 so that counter affidavit be filed. Meanwhile, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in B.F. Case no.31 of 2010, pending in the court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Umesh Prasad Saha Alias Umesh Saha Alias Niro Saha Vs. the State of Jh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.15 of 2013 Umesh Prasad Saha @ Umesh Saha @ Niro Saha @ Niro Sah ...................................Petitioner VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. Gautam Kumar For the State :A.P.P 4.15.4.13. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 19.4.2013. At the same time, petitioner would be at liberty to take step for personal service of notice upon opposite party no.2. In anticipation of appearance of opposite party no.2 or on filing affidavit regarding service of notice, let this matter be listed on 15.5.2013. Till then, further proceeding in P.C.R. No.73 of 2008 (T.R.No.683 of 2012), pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class,...
Dr Kashi Nath Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.1057of2012 Dr.KashiNathRam ....Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. .....Oppositeparties. CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMRSJUSTICEJAYAROY .... ForthePetitioner :Mr.KrishnaMurari,Adv. FortheState :Mr.A.Allam,Sr.S.C.II Orderno.9 Dated15 th April,2013 1. Theamountindifferentheadswererequiredtobepaidtothe petitionerandoutofwhichmostofthepaymentshavealreadybeen made.2. Accordingtothelearnedcounselforthecontemnors,forsome ofthematters,likequantificationofcommutationofpensionand grant of third ACP etc. some formalities still are required to be completedbythepetitioner.3. Learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmittedthatpetitioneris sick;petitioner'swifeissickandpetitionervisitedseveraltimesto thevariousoffices.4. Looking to the progress made, we are giving one more opportunity to the State to do the needful and make the actual payment to the petitioner and petitioner shall cooperate and will completetheformalities,whichisrequiredtobec...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »