Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiv Prasad Sahu Vs. District Administration
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.4216 of 2012 Shiv Prasad Sahu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ........ Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey For the Respondents : J.C. to G.A. I.A. No. 1927 o05. 15.04.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner seeks an early hearing of the case. No special ground has been made for listing the case for early hearing. I.A. No.1927 of 2013 is disposed of, accordingly. W.P.C. No. 4216 of 2012 List this case after 8 weeks. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Sulekha Kumari Vs. Welfare
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5922 of 2012 Sulekha Kumari & Anr. . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, G.P.V ----- 06/15.04.2013 In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the Letter Nos. 27 & 28, both dated 14.6.2012 (Annexures - 5 & 5/1 respectively), issued by the District Social Welfare Officer, whereby the petitioners have been removed from the posts of Anganbari Sevika and Anganbari Sahaika. It has been stated that the impugned orders are wholly illegal and without jurisdiction. According to the guideline, the Child Development Project Officer is the competent authority to pass such order, but the impugned orders have been passed by the District Social Welfare Officer. The said factual and legal position has not been disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the resp...
Ravi Shankar Tiwary Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3913 of 2012 Ravi Shankar Tiwary ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the State : - Mr. S.K. Dubey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. 04/15.04.2013 As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case on 17.04.2013 for filing injury report issued by M.G.M. Hospital, Jamshedpur. In the meantime, interim order dated 20.12.2012 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Ashratul Bibi Alias Lofon Bibi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3812 of 2012 Ashratul Bibi @ Lofon Bibi .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra S. Singh For the State: Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Aishwarya Prakash 6/15.04.2013: Let this case be tagged along with WP(Cr.) No. 381 of 2011. In the meantime, interim order dated 19.12.2012 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Hareshwar Nath Ojha Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.7211of2012 HareshwarNathOjha. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.ManojTandan,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toAAG 08/15.04.2013: Learned J.C. to AAG prays for two weeks' time to file specificaffidavitshowingwhetherpetitioner'sappointmentwas within the limited unit meant for Dhanbad district, if not, then underwhichpolicyorprocedure,thepetitionerhasbeenpicked andsoughttobedisplacedfromthatdistrict. Prayerisallowed. Putupthiscaseon14thMay,2013. Till then, interim order dated 30th January, 2013 shall continue. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/...
Hannan Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4776 of 2012 Hannan Khan .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Asmita Srivastava For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 15.04.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Katras ( East Basuriya) PS case No. 256 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 419/420/467/471 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the written report that due to some problem in getting employment after acquisition land by the BCCL, this case has been lodged. It is submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and they are none else, but father in law and son in law. Learned counsel for the informant has supported the contention. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitioner above name...
Uttam Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 1047 of 2007 Uttam Sharma Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Amicus Curiae For the Respondent: Mr. A.P.P. ------ 06/Dated: April, 15, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This matter has been listed before this Court because a letter has been received from the Jail from the sole appellant-accused for prayer of suspension of sentence.2) When the case is called out, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, who was appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court on behalf of the appellant-accused, is absent. On the last occasion also, when the case was called out, he was absent.3) We, therefore, now appoint Sri Rahul Saboo, an Advocate of this Court who is also in the panel list of Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority, as an Amicus Curiae, on behalf of the sole appellant-accused, to assist this Court ...
Ramawatr Oraon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4068 o1. Ramawtar Oraon 2. Birbal Oraon 3. Mahendra Singh ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : - Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, A.P.P. 05/15.04.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Kamal Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.4615 of 2012 Kamal Kumar Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Bihar & another ........ Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sailesh For the Respondents : Mr. S.P.Roy & Mr. Abhishek Kumar 05/15.04.2013 List this case under the heading for admission after 8 weeks. In the meantime, operation of the impugned order dated 23.7.2012 (Annexure-14 ) shall remain stayed. It would be open for the parties to file any further affidavit, which may be considered necessary. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Jitram Oraon Alias Jeetram Oraon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2190of2013 JitramOraon@JeetramOraon Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SurajDeoMunda,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioner is accused in connection with S.T. Case No.29/2012 arisingoutofKiskoP.S.CaseNo.50of2011correspondingtoG.R.No.397of 2011,pendingintheCourtoflearnedSessionsJudge,Lohardaga. ThereisallegationintheF.I.R.thatthedeceased,whowasmarriedto thispetitioner,wassubjectedtotortureinherlifetime. Itwasinformedthat thedeceaseddiedduetodrowningandalltheaccusedpersonshavecremated thedeadbody. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Only raisingsuspiciontheinformanthaslodgedthiscase. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Itrevealsthatthepetitioner,whohappenstobehusbandofthedeceased, didnotinformpoliceregardingdeathofhiswifeandhurriedlycrematedthe deadbodyanddisclosedthatshe...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »