Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Md Firoz Alias Firoz Quraishi Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4300 of 2012 Md. Firoz @ Firoz Quraishi ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Manoj Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Krishna Shankar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate. 07/15.04.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Md. Firoz @ Firoz Quraishi, in connection with C.P. Case No. 1004 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Dhanbad, is moved by Sri Manoj Kumar Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Krishna Shankar, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner gave divorce to the complainant on 29.05.2011 and paid the dower amount on the same day. However, the aforesaid fact is disputed by opposite party no.2. On...
Tag this Judgment!Mahendra Kumar Ruiya Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 4674 of 2012 ----- Mahendra Kumar Ruiya Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Gautam Kumar Dubey Opp.party ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Prashant Pallav For the State : Smt. Richa Sanchita, APP & Sri O.N.Tiwary ----- 04/15.04. 2013. It is stated in the counter affidavit filed today that Complainant had paid Rs.1,96,000/- through bank draft issued in the joint name of petitioner and Shiv Kumar Ruiya. However, it is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that not a single penny deposited in the joint account of official receivers. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce Bank statement of the relevant period of the bank account operated jointly by both receiver. Put up this case after one week. In the meantime, interim order dated 12.02.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/...
Tag this Judgment!Rinki Mandal Alias Rinki Mondal Alias YeasmIn Khatoon Vs. the State of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.63of2013 RinkiMandal@[email protected] Versus StateofJharkhand Opp.Party Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.GautamKumar,Advocate FortheState :Mr.APP ....... 2./15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselforthepetitionerandthelearned counselfortheState. ThefirstinformationreportofRajmahal(Radhanagar) P.S. Case No.112 of 2012/ 243 of2012 (G.R. No.207 of 2012/ 445 of 2012),institutedunderSections365,366A/34oftheIndianPenalCode,is beingsoughttobequashedinviewoftheratiolaiddowninthecaseof LataSinghversusStateofU.P.andAnother[2006(4)EastCr.C63 (SC)],whereinithasbeenobservedthatthecastesystemisacurseonthe nationandthesooneritisdestroyedthebetter.Infact,itisdividingthe nationatatimewhenwehavetobeunitedtofacethechallengesbeforethe nation unitedly. Hence, intercaste marriages are in fact in the national interest as they will result in destroying the caste system. However, disturbingnewsarecomingfromseveralpartsoftheco...
Tag this Judgment!Gopal Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 87 of 2013 Gopal Yadav @ Gopal Prasad Yadav . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr U.K. Choubey, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 02/15.04.2013: First Information Report of Bashishth Nagar P.S. Case No.8 of 2012 registered under Sections 341, 323, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 3/4 of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, is being sought to be quashed on the ground of prosecution being malicious. It was stated that earlier two cases had been lodged against this petitioner, not by the informant but by other person where the allegations made against the petitioner were found to be false and when the final form was submitted, this case has been lodged with the false allegation, which are tainted with malice. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, one can hardly come to the conclusion that ...
Tag this Judgment!B L Goel Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.34 of 2013 B.L.Goel @ B.L.Goal..................................Petitioner VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. S.L.Agrawal For the State :A.P.P 2.15.4.13. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 19.4.2013. Until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in G.O. No.163 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Seraikella. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Md Yusuf Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.296of2013 Md.Yusuf Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SameerSaurabh,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 05/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections498A,323 &506oftheIndianPenalCode. It reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingthecomplainantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry.Thematterwas referredtotheMediator,JHALSAwherebothparties appearedandtermsof settlementhasbeenreducedintowritingandthesamehasbeenacknowledged bybothsides. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionerisallalongreadytoabidebytheterms andconditionslaiddowninthesettlement. Learnedcounselappearingforthecomplainanthassubmittedthatthe termsandconditionsenumeratedinthesettlementareyettobecompliedwith. Ihavegonethroughthereportofthesettlementsubmittedbeforethe CourtbytheMediator,JHALSA. Boththepartieshaveundertakentocomply theirpartofobligation...
Tag this Judgment!Dr Jagdish Prasad Singh Vs. Animal Husbandary Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.10of2013 Dr.JagdishPrasadSingh. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.S.N.Prasad,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toS.C.II 07/15.04.2013: LearnedJ.C.toS.C.IIpraysforandisallowedtwoweeks' timeforfilingreplytotherejoinder. Putupthiscaseon14thMay,2013. Till then, interim order dated 11th January, 2013 shall continue. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/...
Tag this Judgment!Ratan Mahto Vs. Primary Secondary and Mass Education Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.6077 of 2012 Ratan Mahto & Ors. .......... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents .............. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI .............. For the Petitioners : M/s. Hardeo Pd. Singh and Ajeet Kumar Singh. For the State : J.C. to G.A. ............. 3/15.04.2013: In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction on the respondents to absorb and regularise them on the post of teachers of elementary school or any equivalent suitable post considering their long and continuous services of imparting education as Non-formal Instructors in different places of Bokaro District within Jharkhand State. It has been stated that the respondents have considered the case of the similarly situated persons and have passed orders giving employment to the suitable persons. The petitioners filed representations before the authorities mentioning the said facts, but the same have not been he...
Tag this Judgment!Jharkhand Against Corruption Through Its President Durga Oraon Alias M ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P. (PIL) No. 89 of 2013 ---- Jharkhand Against Corruption ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar,Advocate. For the State : Mr.M.S.Anwar,Advocate General. For the C.B.I : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate ----- Order No. 08 Dated :15. h April, 2013 Learned counsel for the C.B.I submitted fresh status report which we, after perusal in Court, are returning to the learned counsel for the petitioner for keeping it safe and maintain the secrecy also. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that C.B.I., in the month of January 2013, projected that investigation is complete and this fact has been taken note of by this Court. Today, in the month of April 2013, the stand of the C.B.I is that C.B.I. is yet engaged in investigation only. It was also projected that C.B.I. is going to seek sanction fo...
Tag this Judgment!Janardan Kumar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10429 of 2012 Janardan Kumar Sahu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Modi For the State : A. P.P. ----- 6/15.4.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.273 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.841 of 2012. Petitioner was posted in Jharkhand Gramin Bank, Gumla, as Cashier and it is stated that the cash used to be brought to the Gramin Bank from State Bank of India, Gumla, where this Branch had an Account. It appears that the cheques were issued for bringing cash from State Bank of India, which used be signed by any two of the three persons, viz., the Branch Manager Krishna Kumar Keshri, Officer Jayant Kumar Ram and the petitioner. There is allegation of defalcation of Rs.31 lak...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »