Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Narayan Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 997 of 2013 Jai Narayan Mahto ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Pandey A. N. Roy For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 498A, 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with S. T. No. 148 of 2011 arising out of Jamua P.S. Case No. 258 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No. 2501 of 2010. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and there being allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons to have subjected the deceased to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have committed her dowry death, earlier the bail applications of this petitioner were rejected twice by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail submitting that...
Vimal Choudhary and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 972 o1. Vimal Choudhary 2. Roshan Choudhary ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioners :Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 216 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1058 of 2012. The petitioners are the father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased boy, whose dead body was found hanging in a tree and it appears that after marriage the deceased was mostly living at his in-laws' place. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and there is no eye witness to the occurrence and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. Le...
Md Israr Khan and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1360 o1. Md. Israr Khan 2. Abdul Aash Khan @ Aash Khan 3. Peshkar Khan @ Ahmad 4. Shamol Khan @ Sahmol Akhtar 5. Javed Khan 6. Samima Khatoon ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sama Khatoon @ Tasbikum Nisa . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Dubey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Moti Gope, A.P.P. ----- 03 /06.03.2013. This application is directed against the order dated 16.02.2012, passed in Complaint Case No.73 of 2001, by the learned C.J.M., Garhwa, whereby, the prayer for discharge has been rejected. An objection has been raised by the office over the maintainability of this application. Since the statutory remedy is available to the petitioners, the office seems to have rightly raised objection over the maintainability of this application. Accordingly, this application is held to be not maintainable and hence, it is dismissed as not maintainable. (R. R. P...
Bhikhu Pandey and ors. Vs. Gupteshwari Devi and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 335 of 2010 Bhikhu Pandey & Others ..Petitioners Versus Gupteshwari Devi & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Arbind Kumar Sinha, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 1973/2012 09/06.03.2013 In this I.A., the petitioners have prayed for substitution of heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent no.6. It has been stated that the said respondent no. 6 died during pendency of the C.M.P. on 28.12.2011 leaving behind her husband, sons and daughter as her heirs and legal representatives, whose names and addresses are described in para 4 of the application. The right to sue survives through the said heirs and legal representatives. Learned counsel for the respondents has not disputed the said facts and has not opposed the application. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. Let the heirs and legal representatives, whose names and addresses are given in paragraph 4 of the applica...
Chandra Nath Banerjee Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No. 1828 o1. Chandra Nath Banerjee 2. Soma Banerjee 3. Kashi Nath Ghosh............................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.D.K.Bharti For the State :A.P.P For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr.Arvind Kumar 6/ 6.3.13. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submits that after observance of the terms and conditions put forth by the parties, the parties have clearly settled their dispute and thereby now only a joint compromise petition is to be filed in this case which would be filed in this week. As prayed for, let this matter be listed under the heading for orders on 13.3.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 29.10.2012 shall continue. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Morish Tirkey Alias BenjamIn Tirkey Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1024 of 2013 Morish Tirkey @ Benjamin Tirkey ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Sujay Dayal For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Kotwali (Pandra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 96 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 447 of 2012, S. T. No. 969 of 2012. The case relates to dacoity and the case was instituted against unknown. The petitioner was identified in the T.I.P., and earlier the bail application of this petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn after some arguments. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant and identifying witnesses have since been examined in the Court below and they have not supported the prosecution case and t...
Jiaul Ansari Alias Ziyaul Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1017 of 2013 Jiaul Ansari @ Ziyaul Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Jamil Akhtar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case No. 50 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 250 of 2012 (S. T. No. 194 of 2012). The case relates to dacoity and in view of the fact that there was some recovery from the petitioner, earlier the bail application of this petitioner was rejected by order dated 21.11.2012 in B. A. No. 8044 of 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail submitting that the similar circumstance other co-accused have been granted bail by order dated 05.12.2012 in B. A. No. 6789 of 2012 and by order dated...
Rohit Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1178 of 2012 Rohit Mahto ...........................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .............................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.V.K.Roy For the State :Mr.P.K.Choudhary For the Informant : Mr.V.K.Trived6. 3.13. This application is directed against the order dated 29.2.2012 passed by learned Sessions Judge II, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S case no.140 of 2007 whereby and whereunder this petitioner has been summoned to face trial in which some of the accused persons have already been found guilty for an offence under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that an F.I.R was lodged against this petitioner as well as four other accused persons alleging therein that they all killed Ashok Kumar Verma. The matter was taken up for investigation but the Investigating Officer did not find any culpability on...
Brahmdeo Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 5955 of 2009 Brahmadeo Prasad ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagannath Mahato, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. I ---- I.A. No. 627/2013 09/06.03.2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for an amendment by way of addition of statements and enclosures to the writ petition. It has been stated that the petitioner has filed the writ petition for seeking direction on the respondents to pay his first and second A.C.P. and other benefits. The letters have been issued regarding acceptance of the petitioner's claim of first and second A.C.P. The petitioner wants to bring on record the said letters/documents and relevant statements by way of amendment. It has been submitted that the amendment sought to be made are based on the similar factual ground, which is already on record in the writ petition. If the same is allo...
Elecius Lakra and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.1693 of 2012 Elecius Lakra & Ors. ... Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ....... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioners : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the State : S.C.I ------ I.A. No.976 o8. 06.03.2013: Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not press this I.A. This I.A. is, accordingly, rejected, as not pressed. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) W.P.(S) No.1693 of 2012 Learned S.C.I prays for further two weeks' time to come with a clear affidavit as required by order dated 8.2.2013. Prayer is allowed by way of last indulgence. Put up this case on 21st March, 2013. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Shamim/...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »