Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Paswan and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1206 o1. Ajay Paswan 2. Upendra Paswan ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Katras P.S. Case No. 70 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1294 of 2012. The petitioners are alleged to be involved in illegal transaction of coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Ajay Paswan and Upendra Paswan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Subhas, learned Jud...
Aradhana Singh Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.667of2013 AradhanaSingh .... .... .... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Anr. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.AjitKumar,A.A.G. th OrderNo.03 Dated,6 March,2013 Admit. ListthiscasealongwithW.P.(C)No.360of2013. The same order, as has been passed in W.P.(C) No.360 of 2013,isbeingpassedthatthepetitionermaymoveanappropriate application for extension of time to surrender in the revision petition. TheconcernedBenchmaypassappropriateorderofextension oftimeunderRule159oftheJharkhandHighCourtRules,2001, asperthedescriptionoftheCourtandaccordingtothefactsofthe case. Meanwhile,thepetitionershallnotbearrestedforone weekfromtoday. Ifthepetitionerdoesnotmovesuchapplicationorany adverseorderispassedbytherevisionalcourt,theordershallstand vacatedautomaticallyandthetimegrantedbythelearnedSingle Judgeintheorderdated21.2.2013shallstandextendedf...
Suraj Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.350of2013 SurajMahto Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajeshKr.Mahtha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/06.03.2013 PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithExciseP.S.CaseNo.34of2012, pendingintheCourtoflearnedAdditionalchiefJudicialMagistrate,Ranchi. As prayed, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
The Superintendent of Police Koderma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 263 of 2012 with I.A. No. 3392 of 2012 Superintendent of Police, Koderma ...... Appellant Vrs. 1.Hemraj Prasad Mehta 2.Mithilesh Prasad Mehta 3.The State of Jharkhand 4. Director General of Police, Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. Dy. Inspector General of Police, Ranchi(Personnel) 6. Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh 7. Superintendent of Police, Chatra 8. Superintendent of Police, Giridih ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: M/s Santosh Kumar For the Respondents: Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Adv. ------ Dated 06th March, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of delay being I.A. No.3392 of 2012. In view of the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 3392 of 2012 is allowed. Heard learned counsel for the parties on merit. Admittedly, a number of persons have been giv...
Ms Bharti Telemedia Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Sign ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 408 of 2013 M/s Bharti Telemedia Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 909 of 2013 Tata Sky Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents with W.P.(T) No. 1043 of 2013 Bharat Business Channel Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Poddar, Sr. Adv.(in W.P(T) No.408/13) Mr. D.K. Singh, Adv.(in W.P.(T) No.909/13) Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Adv.(in W.P.(T) No.1043/13) For the Respondents: Mrs. A. R. Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG ------ Order No.5 Dated 05th March, 2013. As per learned counsel for the State-revenue, pleadings are complete in W.P.(T) No. 408 of 2013. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he received one supplementary counter affidavit tod...
Deo Narayan Pandey Alias Barsati Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9055 of 2012 Deo Narayan Pandey @ Barsati ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 145 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5301 of 2011. An unknown dead body was recovered and the case was instituted against unknown. However, it appears from the impugned order that on investigation was found that one FIR for the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code was registered in Kaptanganj police station in the district of Bansti (U.P.), from where it transpired that owner of a truck had been killed and the materials loaded on the truck we...
Dibesh Kumar Sarkar Vs. Railways
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1268 of 2013 with W.P. (C) No. 1271 of 2013 with W.P. (C) No. 796 of 2013 --- Ram Chandra Ram (WPC 1268/13) Biswanath Saw @ Bisnath Sah (WPC 1271/13) Dibas Kumar Sarkar @ Dibesh Kr. Sarkar (WPC 796/13) --- --- --- Petitioners Versus The Union of India through Ministry of Railways, New Delhi & others (all cases) --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar, Advocate For the State: JC to GP-III --- 04/ 06.03.2013 In these writ petitions, petitioners are aggrieved by the notice and order dated 07th December 2012 and 22nd January 2013 passed by the Estate Officer, Eastern Railway, Malda (Respondent no. 3), by which petitioners have been asked to vacate the lands in question.2. According to the petitioners, the land in question have been purchased by them under registered sale deed from the vendors in whose favour the same were settled earlier by the State authoritie...
Managemant of M/S Bokaro Steel Vs. their Workman MohiuddIn Ansari
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.3851 of 2009 Management of M/s Bokaro Steel Plant, Steel Authority of India Ltd. Bokaro ..... Petitioner Versus Their workman Mohiuddin Ansari ........ Respondent ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the Respondent : Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar I.A. No. 1219 o05. 06.03.2013 By way of this interlocutory application the respondent- workman in question has claimed payment of last drawn wages during the pendency of the instant writ petition on the basis of the impugned award in the main writ petition by which he has been directed to be reinstated in service. According to the workman, he ought to have retired on 1.9.2011, though he was retired prematurely by the management on 31.8.2005. As per the claim of the petitioner, It appears that he has attained the age of superannuation on 1.9.2011 and even his I.A which was pending since March, 2010 has not been pressed earlier. In ...
Dr.Chandra Mouli Jha and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4803 of 2009 Dr. Chandra Mouli Jha & Anr. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. 1 ---- I.A. No. 173/2013 08/06.03.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this I.A. This I.A. is, accordingly, rejected as not pressed. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Janardan Paswan Alias Janardhan Paswan Alias Badka Vs. the State of Jh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 992 of 2013 Janardan Paswan @ Janardhan Paswan @ Badaka ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 366, 380, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ramkanda P.S. Case No. 40 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1671 of 2012. There is allegation against the petitioner to have enticed away the wife of the informant. The statement of the victim lady was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein, she has not made any allegation against the petitioner, rather she has stated that due to illicit relationship of her husband, she had left her house. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. According...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »