Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arjun Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1003 of 2013 Arjun Mahto ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Nisith Kr. Sahani For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 452, 341, 323, 387, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chas P.S. Case No. 270 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1547 of 2012. The police case was instituted on the basis of the complaint petition and on perusal of the same, it appears that there is land dispute between the parties and there is also Civil Suit pending between the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Arjun Mahto is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)...
Rekha Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 307 o1. Azad Mian @ Ansari 2. Mehrun Bibi 3. Mumtaz Ansari @ Mantaj Ansari 4. Sarafat @ Garaiat Ansari @ Sarafat Ansari 5. Maneer Ansari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. A.K.Choudhary For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 06.03.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners in connection with Deoghar Kunda PS case No. 280/2012 for the offence registered under section341. 323/504/498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioners have been prosecuted for causing torture and treating the informant with cruelty for want of more dowry. It is alleged that all the accused persons tried to kill her by pouring kerosene oil, but due to intervention of neighbour, she saved her life. Learned c...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›