Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anant Deo Prasad Mittal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.5417 of 2005 Anant Deo Prasad Mittal ..... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Roy For the Respondent : Mrs. I.Sen Choudhary I.A. No. 693 o09. 06.03.2013 By way of the present interlocutory application petitioner has sought to challenge the purported decision of the respondent- University whereby it is stated that they have chosen to deny the claim of the petitioner for appointment of two of his nominee in the college under the University in question. However, it appears from perusal of the Item No. 7 of the resolution dated 15.2.2002 annexed as Annexure-B to the counter affidavit filed by the University that the University has not taken any decision so far on the issue of the rejection of the claim of the petitioner for appointment of his nominees in the University- College is concerned. In the rejoinder filed by the ...
Rukmani Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 2690 o1. Rukmani Devi 2.Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Kumar Singh 3.Dilip Singh @ Dilip Kumar Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Rita Devi . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 03 /06.03.2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed, as withdrawn. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise all the points which have been raised in this application at an appropriate stage. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Kallol Kumar Mukherjee Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No. 6729 of 2007 Kallol Kumar Mukherjee .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Additional Director, Mines, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 5. The District Mining Officer, Dumka. ... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT --- For the Petitioner : M/s Jitendra S. Singh, K.K.Mishra, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Shamim Akhtar, S.C.Mines. --- Order No.05 Dated 06th March, 2013. The petitioner, by way of filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to dispose of the lease renewal application dated 27.10.93 with respect to Mouza- Ghumrupahar, Plot No. 123, measuring 4.10 Ares in the District of Dumka regarding mining of fire clay, which was earlier refused on the ground of limit...
Kameshwar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5678 of 2006 Kameshwar Mishra ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Goswami For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.-II ........ 15/06.03.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Sunil/ Binit...
School of Competition Through Its Manager Sahdeo Jha and anr Vs. Regio ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7774 of 2012 School of Competition (Sponsored and Managed by Rohini Education and Expansion Trust) through its Manage Sahdeo Jha and Another Petitioners -V e r s u s- Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Regional Office Jharkhand, Ranchi & Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioners : - M/s Ashok Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : - M/s R. R. Nath & Rajan Raj I. A. No. 1049 o03. 06.03.2013 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue remedy before the Appellate Forum by filing an appeal under the Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be protected, in the meantime, as the respondents have started taking coercive steps against the petitioners for recovery of the dues, in question. Learned counsel for t...
Nakuldeo Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 3652 of 2006 Nakuldeo Prasad...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others ..Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent Nos. : J.C. to S.C.I -- 04/6.3.2013 Itappears thatthe matterhad been referred toLok Adalat earlier. Thewritpetitionwasinrelationtopaymentofretirement benefitsandotherconsequentialbenefitslikeG.P.F.etc. Fromthe statements made in paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondentno. 5 and the submission of the learned counselappearingonhisbehalf,itappearsthatthepetitioner'sclaim hasbeensettledinrelationtoenhancementofscaleunderACPand interestonG.P.F.paymentofT.A.hasalreadybeenissuedinhis favour. It further appears that in the Lok Adalat held on 19th January,2008thepetitionerhadappearedandacceptedtheChequeof Rs.6,340/andRs.5,619/andalsomadeendorsementthathedoes nothaveanyobjectioninrespectofthesame. Acc...
Md.irfan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No. 1133 of 2008 Md. Irfan..............................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand..........................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.Birat Kumar 3/ 6.3.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Voltas Limited Vs. Excise Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI TaxAppealNo.16of2012 With TaxAppealNo.17of2012 With I.A.No.2801of2012andI.A.No.2802of2012 VoltasLimited .... .... .... Appellant (Inbothcases) Versus DeputyCommissioner,CentralExcise,Jamshedpur&Anr. .... .... ....Respondents (Inbothcases) CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate Mr.RatneshKumar,Advocate th OrderNo.10 Dated,6 March,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheappellant. ThesetwoappealsaredecidedinTaxAppealNo.16of 2012becauseinboththemattersissuesinvolvedisofcondonation ofdelay only.Factsaresimilar, therefore,wearetakingfactsof T.A.No.16of2012. TheCESTATwasnotsatisfiedwiththegroundshown by the appellant for not filing the appeal within the period of limitationhence,theapplicationforcondonationofdelayhasbeen dismissedbyCESTAT. Learnedcounselfortheappellantsubmittedthatagainst the same order, the appeal has already been preferred by the Revenuewhichispen...
Umesh Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 300 of 2013 Umesh Yadav .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 06.03.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. It reveals from seizure list and the offence report that a Shaktiman truck loaded with mica was seized by the forest guard. The apprehended driver of the truck disclosed name of this petitioner as the person who involved in illegal mining of mica. It is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he has no concern with mica or the truck seized in this case. Only on the basis of confession of the driver, petitioner has been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering facts and circumstances of the case and the materials against the petitioner, he is directed to appear/ surren...
Dr.Sanjoy Misra Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.661 of 2011 Dr. Sanjoy Misra. . Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Vishal Kr. Trivedi & Shresth Gautam, Advocates For the State : Sr. S.C.I For the Ranchi University: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta & Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocates ------ 3/06.03.2013: In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction on the respondents to pay arrears and current salary in the scale of University Professor.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is holding the post of University Professor in Chemistry in Ranchi College under Ranchi University.3. The petitioner is aggrieved by forward shifting of the date for counting length of his service to his prejudice. The respondents are counting the length of his service for time bound promotion, with effect from the date of his substantive appointment, whereas the petitioner clai...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »