Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
- Case No.0 of N Vijay Soren Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(HBCr)No.344of2012 VijaySoren Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.CHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner: Mr.Md.Hatim FortheRespondents: Mr.A.K.Mishra,S.C.III 06/Dated:March,06,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J1) The counsel for the petitioner submitted that now he is not appearing for the original petitioner, but, it is fairly submitted by the counselforthepetitionerthatadetailedcounteraffidavithasbeenfiled bytheStateandinparagraph10ofthecounteraffidavit,itisstatedthat bothPoonamKumaraswellasthepetitioner,whoaresisterandbrother andbothchildrenoflateHemantSoren,arenotrecordedinthevoterlist and they are not residing in Village Nemra as per report of the Circle Officer,DistrictRamgarhandstillthereisfurtherverificationstatedin paragraph10ofthecounteraffidavit.Itisalsosubmittedbythecounsel fortheStatethatneitherVijaySorennorhissisterPoonamKumariare stayingatVillageNemra,DistrictRamgarh....
M/S V.R.Construction and ors Vs. Steel Authority of India Limit
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6874 of 2011 M/s V. R. Construction & Ors. Petitioners -V e r s u s- The Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors. Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioners : - M/s Rohit Roy, Advocate For the Respondents :- Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate I. A. No. 804 o10. 06.03.2013 The instant interlocutory application has been filed by the respondent- Steel Authority of India for modification in the interim order passed on 29.10.2012 whereby it has been directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. From the submissions of the parties, it appears that the said order has been passed after completion of pleadings and after hearing the parties, granting interim order to the petitioners. No change in the circumstances appears to be undergone since then for the respondents to seek modification in the said order. I do not find any reason to modify the order dated 09.10.2012. Accordingly, I. A. No...
Rama Shankar Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5660 of 2011 Rama Shankar Yadav ... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ....... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.G. ------ 5/06.03.2013: The petitioner has prayed for direction on the respondents for giving promotion to the petitioner to the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police from the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police with all consequential benefits from the date the other similarly situated persons and juniors to the petitioner have been given promotion. According to the petitioner, he is at present holding the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police and posted in Gumla District Force at Sesai Police Station. He belongs to O.B.C. (Other Backward Class) category. The petitioner is eligible for promotion to the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police. The persons, junior to him in the same category, have b...
Ajay Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9664 of 2012 Ajay Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 06.03.2013 By order dated 01.02.2013, status report of the stage of trial was called for from the Court concerned, which is not yet received. Let a reminder be issued for the same and the order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Priyanka Devi Alias Sushma Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10248 of 2012 Priyanka Devi @ Sushma Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Devesh Krishna, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 8/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 364 A of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bhandariya P.S. Case No. 36 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1782 of 2012. The petitioner has been made accused in the case and there is allegation against her and other co-accused persons to have abducted the informant for ransom. ATM card of the informant was also taken away and the impugned order shows that Rs. 42,000/- was withdrawn from the account. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Priyanka Devi @ Sushma Devi, on bail. Accordingly, her prayer f...
Sohrai Pahan Vs. Revenue Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6604 of 2012 Sohrai Pahan & Ors. Petitioners -V e r s u s- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : - M/s Shiv Shankar Kumar For the Respondents : - Mr. V. K. Prasad 02/06.03.2013 This writ petition arises out of proceeding of the CNT Act, subject matter of which appears to be assigned to another Bench. Learned counsel for the State submits that he is in process to file the counter affidavit. Let the matter be listed before appropriate Bench under the same Heading. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/...
Prakash Sahay Vs. Revenue Department or Tax
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4581 of 2012 Prakash Sahay . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Das, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to AAG ----- 7/06.03.2013 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction on the respondents to revoke the order of suspension. It has been stated that the petitioner is a clerk in Commercial Taxes Department, Ramgarh Circle, Ramgarh. By Memo no.807 dated 18.02.2010, the petitioner was put under suspension in contemplation of some departmental enquiry. Since thereafter about three years lapsed, departmental proceeding has not been initiated so far. On that ground, the petitioner prayed for revocation of his suspension order. When the case is taken up today, learned J.C. to AAG, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that the petitioner's order of suspension has been revoked by the department and a spe...
State of Jharkhand and ors Vs. M/S Electrosteel Integrated Lt
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No. 489 of 2010 with L.P.A. No. 26 of 2011 State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... ... Appellants Vs. M/s Electrosteel Integrated Ltd. & Ors.. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellants : Mr. Rajesh Shankar For the Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha Order No. 12 ------ Dated 6th March, 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admit. No need to issue notice to the respondents, as the respondents have already put in appearance. Learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment dated 29th March, 2010 directed the appellate Court to decide the appeal expeditiously, which is Title Appeal No.33 of 2007. A copy of this order be sent to Principal District Judge, Bokaro before whom the Title Appeal No. 33 of 2007 is said to be pending. The Principal District Judge, Bokaro is directed to decide the appeal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. List these m...
Parmeshwar Dayal Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.A.No.22of2013 ParmeshwarDayal ......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors......Respondents CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMRSJUSTICEJAYAROY .... FortheAppellant :Mr.BishambharShastri,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.R.N.Roy,G.P .III& Mr.A.K.Yadav,Adv. Dated6 th March,2013 ByCourt This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred againsttheinterimorderand,therefore,itisnotmaintainable. TheLettersPatentAppealisdismissed,asnotmaintainable. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J) G.Jha/...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt.Usha Prasad
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI TaxAppealNo.19of2007 CommissionerofIncomeTax,Patna.... .... .... Appellant Versus Smt.UshaPrasad .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate FortheRespondent : th OrderNo.09 Dated,6 March,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheappellant. Followingquestionoflawisinvolvedinthisappeal: Whetheronthefactsandinthecircumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in ignoring the documentary evidence brought on record by A.O. indicating the operation of impugned bank account by theassesseeherself? Admit. Issuenoticetotherespondent,forwhichrequisitesintwosets be submitted within a period of two weeks, and upon filing of which,onebesentbyregisteredpostwithA/D. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »