Jharkhand Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikas Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.667of2013 NitishKumarMehta .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.NareshPrasadThakur,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingfortheState. Petitioner is an accused in this case registered under Sections379oftheIndianPenalCodeandthereafter,Section411of theIndianPenalCodeisalsoadded. Counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatthe otherthreecoaccusednamelyLawSingh,KushSinghandRajaSingh @SaurabhSinghhavealreadybeengrantedbailbythisCourt.Itis alsosubmittedthatthepetitionerisincustodysince12.11.2012. Counsel appearing for the State has not disputed the aforesaidcontentionsmadebythecounselforthepetitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedonbail,onfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10...
Manoj Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 762 of 2013 Manoj Singh ........... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand ...... ......... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 2/ 05.02.2013 Heard the counsel for petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in this case registered under Sections 272 /273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against him is that from his shop 96 Litres of country made liquor has been recovered. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 23.12.2012 i.e. more than one month. Counsel for the State opposed but not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of...
Chinta Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 604 of 2012 Chinta Devi Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ------ For the Appellant: M/s Ajit Kumar For the Respondents: A.P.P. ----- 13/Dated 5th February1. Present appeal was admitted vide order dated 24th September, 2012. Record and proceedings of S.T. No. 267 of 2002 was called for from the trial court so as to appreciate the arguments on the prayer of suspension of sentence under section 389 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The present appellant has been convicted vide order dated 29th March, 2003 in S.T. No. 267 of 2002 by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 7, Hazaribag and vide order dated 31st March, 2003, she was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under section 302 of the I.P.C. and also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for t...
Pappu Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No. 72 of 2013 Pappu Singh. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Gaurav Priyadershi, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 03/ 05.02.2013 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of road robbery in which the informant and other passers by were looted by the miscreants on the point of pistol. During investigation, two looted motorcycles have been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted that other co-accused-Surendra Lohra @ Gudan from whose possession one looted motorcycle was recovered, has been granted bail on 7.12.2012 vide B.A.No. 8100 of 2012. The petitioner was neither put on T.I.P. nor named by any witness. He is in custody for last one year. At best he can be held liable for the offence punishable under Section 412 of the ...
Ms D K Fabricators Vs. Finance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 5878 of 2012 M/s D.K. Fabricators ......Petitioner Vrs. The Union of India and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. Binod Poddar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Amrita Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, SC(CE) ------ Dated 06th February, 2013. In this case, the petitioner's application filed under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act,1994 has been dismissed without giving opportunity of hearing to petitioner vide order dated 02.5.2012(annexure-9). The petitioner's prayer is that he should have been given opportunity of hearing by the Commissioner(Appeals), Central Excise and Service Tax, Ranchi. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the order dated 3rd February,2012 passed by this court in W.P.(T) No.441 of 2012, in the case of M/s Panch Sheel Udyog Vrs. Union of India and others....
Ajeet Singh Alias Ajeet Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 4299 of 2012 ----- Ajeet Singh @ Ajeet Kumar Singh Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.party . ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. S.S.Prasad For the State : Sri. Abhishek Kumar, APP ----- 03/05.02. 2013. Call for case diary of Rehla P.S.case no. 42/2010 from the court concerned and put up this case after receipt of the same. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/...
Md Tipu Alias Saddam Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.651of2013 Md.Tipu@Saddam .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.ArbindKumar,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingfortheState. Petitioner is an accused in this case registered under Section411oftheIndianPenalCode. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that from the possession of the petitioner one motorcycle has been recoveredandhecouldnotproduceanypaper.Itisalsosubmittedthat the petitioner is in custody since 7th March, 2012 i.e. nearly eleven months. Counsel appearing for the State has submitted that from thepossessionofthepetitionerstolenmotorcyclehasbeenrecovered. Consideringthesubmissionsmadebyboththepartiesand considering the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedonbail,onfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)withtwo...
Amrit Kachhap Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.10446of2012 with B.A.No.56of2013 with B.A.No.13of2013 AmritKachhap Petitioner(InB.A.No.10446of2012) SanjayKachhap Petitioner(InB.A.No.56of2013) JoginderOraon Petitioner(InB.A.No.13of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :M/sGaneshPathak&S.K.Upadhyay,Advocates FortheState :APP 03/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 302/34oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection27oftheArmsAct. Itrevealsthatthehusbandoftheinformantwaskilledwhenhe wasreturningfromBlockOffice.Theinformanthasraisedsuspicionagainstthe petitionersandotheraccusedwithwhomhewashavingpreviousenmity. ItissubmittedthatoneofthecoaccusedDeepakSinghhasbeen grantedbailbyaBenchofthisCourtvideB.A.No.493of2013. Thereisno direct or circumstantial evidence available in the case diary against these petitioners. Learned counsel of the State submitted that the movement of accusedp...
Pushpa Choudhary and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1857 o1. Pushpa Choudhary 2.Amitabh Choudhary ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Anju Kumari . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Jerath, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. B. M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate ----- 03 /05.02.2013. Mr. Jerath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that though earlier conciliation had failed, but now due to intervention of the counsel appearing for the parties, the parties have agreed to settle their matrimonial dispute on the terms which would be reduced in writing and the parties will be filing a joint compromise petition day after tomorrow I.e. 07.02.2013. As prayed for, on behalf of the parties, list this case case on 07.02.2013. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Ajay Dangi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.9942of2012 AjayDangi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.AbhayKr.Chaturvedi,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 05/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioner is accused in connection withS.T. No.41 of 2012 arisingoutofRajpurP.S.CaseNo.15of2011correspondingtoG.R.No.372of 2011 registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code which is pendingintheCourtoflearnedPrincipalSessionsJudge,Chatra. Thisisacaseofdowrydeath.Thedeceasedwifeofthepetitioner wassubjectedtotortureandtreatedwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowryduring herlifetimeandshewaskilledwithinoneyearofhermarriage. Itissubmittedthattherewasadomesticquarrelamongthefamily membersandduetothatthedeceasedgotannoyedandconsumedpoison.This factissupportedbythewitnessesexaminedinthecasediary. Learnedcounsel,appearing for the State opposedthe prayerfor bailandsubmittedthatthedeceasedherselfhaddisclosedinsemiconscious ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »